Author Affiliations
1 School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 0 66004, China2 School of Information Science and Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 0 66004, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Fluorescence spectra of original and corrected Z7 samples. (a) Original three-dimensional spectral map; (b) corrected three-dimensional spectral map; (c) original contour map; (d) corrected contour map
Fig. 2. Trilinear model
Fig. 3. Fluorescence spectral data of Z7 before and after compression. (a) Before compression; (b) after compression
Fig. 4. Partial emission spectra of Z7 before and after compression. (a1)-(a4) Before compression; (b1)-(b4) after compression
Fig. 5. Analytical results of Z7 and Z9 with APTLD algorithm. (a) Emission spectra; (b) excitation spectra
Fig. 6. Analytical results of Z7 and F6 with APTLD algorithm. (a) Emission spectra; (b) excitation spectra
Fig. 7. Analytical results of Z7 and F12 with APTLD algorithm. (a) Emission spectra; (b) excitation spectra
Fig. 8. Fitting curves between fluorescence intensity of each component obtained by APTLD algorithm and proportion of each component. (a) Sesame essence in F1-F7 and L1-L4 samples; (b) corn oil in F1-F7 and L1-L4 samples; (c) sesame essence in F8-F13 and L5-L8 samples; (d) rapeseed oil in F8-F13 and L5-L8 samples
Sample | Brand |
---|
Z1Z2Z3Z4Z5Z6Z7Z8Z9Z10Z11Z12Z13Z14Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5CJ | DamingyongzhenFulinmenHuaruiLihongMingxuanFulaiweiJinlongyuDamingyongzhenFulaiweiFulinmenJinlongyuLuhuaMingxuanDamingyongzhenWannianJinlongyuLuhuaFulinmenXiwangJindingShangwei |
|
Table 1. Brand of vegetable oil samples
Sample | Proportion |
---|
F1F2F3F4F5F6F7L1L2L3L4F8F9F10F11F12F13L5L6L7L8 | JX…Y=0…9JX…Y=0.5…5JX…Y=3…3JX…Y=4…2JX…Y=5…0.5JX…Y=6…0.5JX…Y=8…0JX…Y=4.2…7.5JX…Y=4.8…5.2JX…Y=5.2…4.2JX…Y=6.6…3.6JX…C=0.5:9JX…C=2…7JX…C=3…4JX…C=4…2JX…C=5…1JX…C=9…0.5JX…C=3.7…5.5JX…C=4.5…3.4JX…C=5.5…2.0JX…C=6.5…1.5 |
|
Table 2. Proportion of each component in adulterated oil samples
Sample | LCS /% | LRS /% |
---|
Z7F6F13 | 96.5696.9594.68 | 99.9698.9999.91 |
|
Table 3. Compression results of several analytical samples
Sample | Recovery ratio /%[predicted proportion] |
---|
APTLD | SWATLD | PARAFAC |
---|
Sesame essence | Corn oil | Sesame essence | Corn oil | Sesame essence | Corn oil | L1L2L3L4 | 97.9[4.11]98.1[4.71]99.8[5.19]99.5[6.57] | 97.5[7.31]99.8[5.19]97.9[4.11]99.2[3.57] | 97.3[4.09]97.5[4.68]98.3[5.11]98.5[6.50] | 96.4[7.23]97.3[5.06]96.0[4.03]97.5[3.51] | 93.1[3.91]95.0[4.56]93.7[4.87]94.5[6.24] | 94.0[7.05]95.6[4.97]94.3[3.96]90.8[3.27] | (ra±re) /%RMSEP | 98.8±1.50.066 | 98.6±3.30.106 | 97.9±2.80.105 | 96.8±5.20.149 | 94.1±8.10.308 | 93.7±11.40.325 |
|
Table 4. Predicted proportion and recovery rate of each component in adulterated sesame oil samples L1-L4
Sample | Recovery /%[predicted proportion] |
---|
APTLD | SWATLD | PARAFAC |
---|
Sesame essence | Rapeseed oil | Sesame essence | Rapeseed oil | Sesame essence | Rapeseed oil | L5L6L7L8 | 97.8[3.62]96.4[4.34]99.1[5.45]98.0[6.37] | 96.7[5.32]95.9[3.26]96.5[1.93]98.0[1.47] | 97.0[3.59]95.1[4.28]98.3[5.41]96.8[6.29] | 95.8[5.27]93.8[3.19]93.5[1.87]95.3[1.43] | 86.8[3.21]89.1[4.01]90.4[4.97]90.8[5.90] | 89.1[4.90]92.6[3.15]89.0[1.78]87.3[1.31] | (ra±re) /%RMSEP | 97.8±2.90.113 | 96.8±3.10.120 | 96.8±4.30.168 | 94.6±4.40.172 | 89.3±13.50.530 | 89.5±9.10.356 |
|
Table 5. Predicted proportion and recovery rate of each component in adulterated sesame oil samples L5-L8