Author Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215021, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Model of laser peeling of metallic materials
Fig. 2. Cloud pictures of temperature field in shielding layer. (a) Temperature field in quasi-steady state; (b) longitudinal distribution of temperature field
Fig. 3. Influence of laser power on peeling quality of shielding layer
Fig. 4. Influence of laser scanning speed on peeling quality of shielding layer
Fig. 5. Influence of laser frequency on peeling quality of shielding layer
Fig. 6. Influence of defocusing distance on peeling quality of shielding layer
Fig. 7. (a) Effect picture and (b) kerf surface of laser peeling of shielding layers after laser parameter optimization
Serial number | Power /W | Scanning speed /(mm·s-1) | Frequency /kHz | Defocusing distance /mm | Kerf width /(10-2 mm) | Kerf depth /mm |
---|
1 | 12 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 0.207 | 0.019 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 0.361 | 0.079 | 3 | 16 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 0.482 | 0.120 | 4 | 18 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 0.516 | 0.120 | 5 | 20 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 0.826 | 0.120 | 6 | 16 | 1 | 30 | 0 | 0.861 | 0.120 | 7 | 16 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 0.723 | 0.120 | 8 | 16 | 7 | 30 | 0 | 0.431 | 0.090 | 9 | 16 | 9 | 30 | 0 | 0.258 | 0.062 | 10 | 16 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0.327 | 0.099 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 0.448 | 0.120 | 12 | 16 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 0.561 | 0.120 | 13 | 16 | 5 | 50 | 0 | 0.534 | 0.109 | 14 | 16 | 5 | 30 | -2 | 0.172 | 0.040 | 15 | 16 | 5 | 30 | -1 | 0.334 | 0.087 | 16 | 16 | 5 | 30 | 1 | 0.429 | 0.051 | 17 | 16 | 5 | 30 | 2 | 0.086 | 0.006 |
|
Table 1. Process parameters and test results for laser peeling of shielding layers
Level | Factor | |
---|
A /W | B /(mm·s-1) | C /kHz | D /mm |
---|
1 | 15 | 4 | 20 | -0.5 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 6 | 40 | 0.5 |
|
Table 2. Factor level table
Serial number | Element | Result |
---|
A /W | B /(mm·s-1) | C /kHz | D /mm | | Kerf width /(10-2 mm) | Kerf depth /mm |
---|
1 | 15 | 4 | 20 | -0.5 | 0.686 | 0.096 | 2 | 15 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 0.549 | 0.120 | 3 | 15 | 6 | 40 | 0.5 | 0.481 | 0.104 | 4 | 17 | 4 | 30 | 0.5 | 0.658 | 0.112 | 5 | 17 | 5 | 40 | -0.5 | 0.562 | 0.120 | 6 | 17 | 6 | 20 | 0 | 0.439 | 0.120 | 7 | 19 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 0.713 | 0.120 | 8 | 19 | 5 | 20 | 0.5 | 0.699 | 0.120 | 9 | 19 | 6 | 30 | -0.5 | 0.672 | 0.120 |
|
Table 3. Arrangement of orthogonal test elements and results
Factor | Kerf width | R /(10-2 mm) |
---|
| /(10-2 mm) | /(10-2 mm) | /(10-2 mm) |
---|
A | 0.572 | 0.553 | 0.695 | 0.142 | B | 0.686 | 0.603 | 0.531 | 0.155 | C | 0.608 | 0.626 | 0.585 | 0.041 | D | 0.640 | 0.567 | 0.613 | 0.073 |
|
Table 4. Range analysis results of kerf widths
Factor | Kerf depth | R /mm |
---|
| /mm | /mm | /mm |
---|
A | 0.107 | 0.117 | 0.120 | 0.013 | B | 0.109 | 0.120 | 0.115 | 0.011 | C | 0.112 | 0.117 | 0.115 | 0.005 | D | 0.112 | 0.120 | 0.112 | 0.008 |
|
Table 5. Range analysis results of kerf depths