Author Affiliations
School of Marine Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710072, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Receiving optical components in underwater imaging system
Fig. 2. Comparison in underwater dark channel prior. (a) Underwater image; (b) traditional dark channel; (c) dark channel of Ref. [9]; (d) dark channel of our method
Fig. 3. Refined transmission. (a) Transmission of R channel; (b) transmission after guided filtering
Fig. 4. Algorithm flow
Fig. 5. First set of image processing results. (a) Original image; (b) result using the method of Ref. [9]; (c) result using the method of Ref. [4]; (d) result using our method
Fig. 6. Second set of image processing results. (a) Original image; (b) result using the method of Ref. [9]; (c) result using the method of Ref. [4]; (d) result using our method
Fig. 7. Third set of image processing results. (a) Original image; (b) result using the method of Ref. [9]; (c) result using the method of Ref. [4]; (d) result using our method
Fig. 8. Fourth set of image processing results. (a) Original image; (b) result using the method of Ref. [9]; (c) result using the method of Ref. [4]; (d) result using our method
Fig. 9. First set of edge detection results. (a) Original image; (b) result using the method of Ref. [9]; (c) result using the method of Ref. [4]; (d) result using our method
Fig. 10. Second set of edge detection results. (a) Original image; (b) result using the method of Ref. [9]; (c) result using the method of Ref. [4]; (d) result using our method
Fig. 11. Third set of edge detection results. (a) Original image; (b) result using the method of Ref. [9]; (c) result using the method of Ref. [4]; (d) result using our method
Fig. 12. Fourth set of edge detection results. (a) Original image; (b) result using the method of Ref. [9]; (c) result using the method of Ref. [4]; (d) result using our method
Image | Clarity | | | |
---|
| Original image | Method of Ref. [9] | Method of Ref. [4] | Our method |
---|
First set of image | 50.629 | 59.963 | 85.787 | 77.560 | Second set of image | 15.924 | 21.358 | 21.990 | 24.595 | Third set of image | 8.726 | 11.805 | 12.222 | 12.736 | Fourth set of image | 10.352 | 10.523 | 7.737 | 22.744 |
|
Table 1. Clarity compared on four images
Image | Contrast | | | |
---|
| Original image | Method of Ref. [9] | Method of Ref. [4] | Our method |
---|
First set of image | 21.509 | 23.506 | 34.480 | 23.588 | Second set of image | 14.679 | 19.925 | 16.251 | 22.628 | Third set of image | 11.640 | 17.022 | 14.541 | 18.230 | Fourth set of image | 21.631 | 26.826 | 10.867 | 44.062 |
|
Table 2. Contrast compared on four images