• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 7, Issue 11, 1266 (2019)
Lin Xu1、4、†, Xiangyang Wang2、†, Tomáš Tyc3、5、†,*, Chong Sheng2, Shining Zhu2, Hui Liu2、6、*, and Huanyang Chen1、7、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
  • 2National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and School of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 3Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic
  • 4Institutes of Physical Science and Information Technology & Key Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Acquisition and Manipulation of Ministry of Education, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
  • 5e-mail: tomtyc@physics.muni.cz
  • 6e-mail: liuhui@nju.edu.cn
  • 7e-mail: kenyon@xmu.edu.cn
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.7.001266 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lin Xu, Xiangyang Wang, Tomáš Tyc, Chong Sheng, Shining Zhu, Hui Liu, Huanyang Chen. Light rays and waves on geodesic lenses[J]. Photonics Research, 2019, 7(11): 1266 Copy Citation Text show less
    AIs (upper row) and corresponding GLs (lower row) with rotational symmetry. In AIs, the center of each lens is marked with S. The position vector is denoted with r. The angle parameter θ is omitted for simplification because of rotational symmetry of AIs and GLs. Contour plots show refractive index profile of n(r). The presented AIs are Maxwell’s fish-eye lens (a), generalized Maxwell’s fish-eye lens with M=5 (b), extended invisible lens (c), and inverse invisible lens (d). The corresponding geodesic lenses are sphere (a), spindle with M=5 (b), Tannery’s pear (c), and truncated Tannery’s pear (d). On GLs, the axis of rotational symmetry is denoted by a dashed line, which connects north (N) pole and south (S) pole. ρ is the radial coordinate, and h(ρ) is the length measured along the meridian from N pole on the geodesic surface. Light rays starting from point A form closed trajectories shown in different colors. S poles are mapped from the centers S of AIs, while N poles correspond to the infinities of AIs. Dashed black circles of AIs are places with refractive index of unity at radius of r0, which are equivalent to those of GLs.
    Fig. 1. AIs (upper row) and corresponding GLs (lower row) with rotational symmetry. In AIs, the center of each lens is marked with S. The position vector is denoted with r. The angle parameter θ is omitted for simplification because of rotational symmetry of AIs and GLs. Contour plots show refractive index profile of n(r). The presented AIs are Maxwell’s fish-eye lens (a), generalized Maxwell’s fish-eye lens with M=5 (b), extended invisible lens (c), and inverse invisible lens (d). The corresponding geodesic lenses are sphere (a), spindle with M=5 (b), Tannery’s pear (c), and truncated Tannery’s pear (d). On GLs, the axis of rotational symmetry is denoted by a dashed line, which connects north (N) pole and south (S) pole. ρ is the radial coordinate, and h(ρ) is the length measured along the meridian from N pole on the geodesic surface. Light rays starting from point A form closed trajectories shown in different colors. S poles are mapped from the centers S of AIs, while N poles correspond to the infinities of AIs. Dashed black circles of AIs are places with refractive index of unity at radius of r0, which are equivalent to those of GLs.
    Real part of the modes with different indices N and m: (a) ψ22 on sphere, (b) ψ50 on spindle, (c) ψ22 on Tannery’s pear, and (d) ψ22 on truncated Tannery’s pear.
    Fig. 2. Real part of the modes with different indices N and m: (a) ψ22 on sphere, (b) ψ50 on spindle, (c) ψ22 on Tannery’s pear, and (d) ψ22 on truncated Tannery’s pear.
    Experimental setup and sample description. (a) Schematic of the observation and coupling scheme of the light to the geodesic lens. A laser beam is coupled to a 3D curved waveguide from the top and excites the rare-earth ions in the waveguide. The emitted fluorescent light at 615 nm is then collected by a CCD camera. (b) 3D curved waveguide morphology captured by a CCD camera when illuminated by white light. (c) Scanning electron microscope image of the 3D curved surface around the coupling grating (red dashed box) before spin coating. The cross structure corresponds to that displayed in (b) and is used to couple laser beams into the waveguide. (d) Scanning electron microscope image of the 3D curved surface with larger scale (blue dashed box) before spin coating. Based on this figure, one can get the accurate parameters of the 3D curved surface.
    Fig. 3. Experimental setup and sample description. (a) Schematic of the observation and coupling scheme of the light to the geodesic lens. A laser beam is coupled to a 3D curved waveguide from the top and excites the rare-earth ions in the waveguide. The emitted fluorescent light at 615 nm is then collected by a CCD camera. (b) 3D curved waveguide morphology captured by a CCD camera when illuminated by white light. (c) Scanning electron microscope image of the 3D curved surface around the coupling grating (red dashed box) before spin coating. The cross structure corresponds to that displayed in (b) and is used to couple laser beams into the waveguide. (d) Scanning electron microscope image of the 3D curved surface with larger scale (blue dashed box) before spin coating. Based on this figure, one can get the accurate parameters of the 3D curved surface.
    Optical measurements and fitting results of light rays in a spindle with M=5. (a) Fitting the shape of micro-structured metallic needle waveguide with a spindle. (b) Optical measurements on micro-structured metallic needle waveguide. (c) Enlarged drawing nearby the coupling source. (d) Fitting the light trajectory of micro-structured metallic needle waveguide with a spindle.
    Fig. 4. Optical measurements and fitting results of light rays in a spindle with M=5. (a) Fitting the shape of micro-structured metallic needle waveguide with a spindle. (b) Optical measurements on micro-structured metallic needle waveguide. (c) Enlarged drawing nearby the coupling source. (d) Fitting the light trajectory of micro-structured metallic needle waveguide with a spindle.
    Sample fabrication process. (a) Position of straight silver wire, movement console (MC), and hydrogen flame. A straight silver wire is fixed on MC1 and MC2 and then put on a hydrogen flame at a proper position. (b) Metallic wire fusion process. The ends of the straight silver wire are pulled at speeds v1 and v2, and the silver wire gradually becomes tapered. (c) Two obtained metallic cones. The silver wire breaks into two metallic cones at some point.
    Fig. 5. Sample fabrication process. (a) Position of straight silver wire, movement console (MC), and hydrogen flame. A straight silver wire is fixed on MC1 and MC2 and then put on a hydrogen flame at a proper position. (b) Metallic wire fusion process. The ends of the straight silver wire are pulled at speeds v1 and v2, and the silver wire gradually becomes tapered. (c) Two obtained metallic cones. The silver wire breaks into two metallic cones at some point.
    (a) Sketch of a metallic waveguide. (b) Cross section of the metallic waveguide.
    Fig. 6. (a) Sketch of a metallic waveguide. (b) Cross section of the metallic waveguide.
    (a) Sketch of the coupling grating (yellow boxes). (b) SEM image of the metallic curved surface and the coupling grating (in red dashed box) before spin-coating process. (c) Grating coupling process and optical measurement of the sample. The yellow boxes in (a) show the coupling grating, the graded blue spot represents the exciting beam, and the blue arrows show the direction of the laser beam propagating in the waveguide. The coupling grating in (a) corresponds to the red dashed box in (b), which is fabricated before spin-coating process. The red dashed box region in (b) corresponds to the grating in (c), which is indicated by the red arrows.
    Fig. 7. (a) Sketch of the coupling grating (yellow boxes). (b) SEM image of the metallic curved surface and the coupling grating (in red dashed box) before spin-coating process. (c) Grating coupling process and optical measurement of the sample. The yellow boxes in (a) show the coupling grating, the graded blue spot represents the exciting beam, and the blue arrows show the direction of the laser beam propagating in the waveguide. The coupling grating in (a) corresponds to the red dashed box in (b), which is fabricated before spin-coating process. The red dashed box region in (b) corresponds to the grating in (c), which is indicated by the red arrows.
    Optical measurements and fitting results of light rays on a sphere. (a) CCD camera picture of micro-structured sphere waveguide. (b) Light trajectory on micro-structured sphere waveguide. (c) Fitting the light trajectory with a sphere.
    Fig. 8. Optical measurements and fitting results of light rays on a sphere. (a) CCD camera picture of micro-structured sphere waveguide. (b) Light trajectory on micro-structured sphere waveguide. (c) Fitting the light trajectory with a sphere.
    LensRefractive Index ProfileGeodesic LensDescription of Geodesic LensSpectrum
    Maxwell’s fish-eye lensn(r)=21+(r/r0)2Sphereh(ρ)=arcsin(ρ)ωNmr0c=(N+m)(N+m+1)N+m+0.5
    Generalized Maxwell’s fish-eye lensn(r)=2(r/r0)1/M11+(r/r0)2/M, M=2,3,4,Spindleh(ρ)=arcsin(Mρ), M=2,3,4,ωNmr0c=(N+M·m)(N+M·m+1)MN+0.5M+m
    Extended invisible lens(r/r0)n3/2+(r/r0)n1/22=0Tannery’s pearh1(ρ)=ρ+2arcsin(ρ), h2(ρ)=ρ+2arcsin(ρ)ωNmr0cN+0.52+m
    Inverse invisible lens(r/r0)n3/2+(r/r0)n1/22=0  for r>r0;n=1forr<r0Truncated Tannery’s pearh1(ρ)=ρ+2arcsin(ρ), h2(ρ)=2+πρωNmr0cN+m+0.5
    Table 1. Description of Four AIs and Corresponding GLs with Spectrum
    Lin Xu, Xiangyang Wang, Tomáš Tyc, Chong Sheng, Shining Zhu, Hui Liu, Huanyang Chen. Light rays and waves on geodesic lenses[J]. Photonics Research, 2019, 7(11): 1266
    Download Citation