• Journal of Natural Resources
  • Vol. 35, Issue 8, 1926 (2020)
Xin LI1、2、3, Xiao-dong MA1、2、3、*, Manh-ha KHUONG4, and Jin-yan ZHU1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Geography, Geomatics & Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
  • 2Institute of Urban-Rural Integrated Development, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
  • 3Research Base on Characteristic Town-Village Construction and Land Management, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
  • 4School of Land, Resources & Environment, Bacgiang University of Agricultural and Forestry, Bacgiang 0084240, Vietnam
  • show less
    DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200813 Cite this Article
    Xin LI, Xiao-dong MA, Manh-ha KHUONG, Jin-yan ZHU. Dynamic mechanism of rural development oriented urban-rural integration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1926 Copy Citation Text show less
    Rural development dynamic mechanism framework based on urban-rural integration perspective
    Fig. 1. Rural development dynamic mechanism framework based on urban-rural integration perspective
    Flowchart of rural development dynamic path under the guidance of urban-rural integration
    Fig. 2. Flowchart of rural development dynamic path under the guidance of urban-rural integration
    Mutual driving forces path for rural development based on the SEM model
    Fig. 3. Mutual driving forces path for rural development based on the SEM model
    潜变量标识观察变量标识平均值标准差
    基础设施融合水平F1污水处理村占比X14.483.50
    自来水村占比X25.602.84
    公路网密度X34.492.66
    与城市时间距离X45.322.99
    公共服务融合水平F3学校数目X54.502.68
    千人床位数X63.433.20
    千人教师数X74.703.23
    乡村要素集聚水平F4地均GDPX84.283.29
    建设用地图斑大小X93.382.61
    单位居住图斑人口X103.972.60
    乡村要素吸引力F2外来人口X112.934.27
    法人企业个数X123.933.06
    固定资产投资X132.562.47
    二三产业人员占比X145.382.17
    乡村发展水平F5农民人均收入X154.572.68
    人均财政收入X163.502.58
    Table 1. Representation and descriptive statistics of variables in SEM model
    统计检验量适配标准或临界值模型结果是否符合标准
    绝对适配度参数χ2P<0.050.000
    RMSEAP<0.080.793
    SRMRP<0.080.126
    GFIP>0.90.904
    增值适配度参数NFIP>0.90.852
    RFIP>0.90.806
    IFIP>0.90.905
    TLIP>0.90.873
    CFIP>0.90.903
    简约适配度参数PGFIP>0.50.557
    PNFIP>0.50.653
    PCFIP>0.50.692
    CNP>20065
    χ2自由度比P<32.527
    Table 2. Summary table of test parameters in SEM model
    作用
    路径
    标准化
    回归权重
    显著性作用
    路径
    标准化
    回归权重
    显著性作用
    路径
    标准化
    回归权重
    显著性
    F4←F10.460.049X4F1-0.65***X6F30.42***
    F2←F30.970.009X11F20.24——X5F31.00***
    F5←F40.340.011X12F20.320.033X8F40.21——
    F5←F20.700.019X13F20.980.009X9F40.890.01
    X1F10.64——X14F20.360.023X10F40.910.03
    X2F10.45***X16F50.49——X15F50.77***
    X3F10.48***X7F30.98——F3↔F10.310
    Table 3. Regression results of rural development driving forces based on SEM model
    路径总效应直接效应间接效应
    F2←F30.97380.97380
    F5←F30.683600.6836
    F4←F10.46420.46420
    F5←F10.155800.1558
    F5←F40.33560.33560
    F5←F20.70200.70200
    Table 4. Direct and indirect effects among latent variables
    Xin LI, Xiao-dong MA, Manh-ha KHUONG, Jin-yan ZHU. Dynamic mechanism of rural development oriented urban-rural integration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1926
    Download Citation