• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 17, Issue 5, 051403 (2019)
Licheng Sun1, Tinghao Liu1, Xing Fu1, Yading Guo2, Xiaojun Wang2, Chongfeng Shao2, Yamin Zheng1, Chuang Sun1, Shibing Lin1, and Lei Huang1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Photonics and Electronics, Department of Precision Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 2Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201917.051403 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Licheng Sun, Tinghao Liu, Xing Fu, Yading Guo, Xiaojun Wang, Chongfeng Shao, Yamin Zheng, Chuang Sun, Shibing Lin, Lei Huang. 1.57 times diffraction-limit high-energy laser based on a Nd:YAG slab amplifier and an adaptive optics system[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17(5): 051403 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of the Nd:YAG slab amplifier with an AO configuration. HR, high reflection mirror; PBS, polarization beam splitter; GM, gain module; QWP, quarter-wave plate; TS, telescope.
    Fig. 1. Schematic of the Nd:YAG slab amplifier with an AO configuration. HR, high reflection mirror; PBS, polarization beam splitter; GM, gain module; QWP, quarter-wave plate; TS, telescope.
    (a) LD array. (b) Gain module without shaping optics. (c) Simulation pump intensity distribution in a Nd:YAG slab without shaping optics. The red rectangle represents the laser beam in a Nd:YAG slab.
    Fig. 2. (a) LD array. (b) Gain module without shaping optics. (c) Simulation pump intensity distribution in a Nd:YAG slab without shaping optics. The red rectangle represents the laser beam in a Nd:YAG slab.
    Experimental results with the 3×1 pump-beam array. Near-field intensity distribution (a) before correction, DN=4.09 mm and (b) after correction, DN=4.55 mm. Far-field intensity distribution (c) before correction, DF=5.10 mm, HBQ=10.89 and (d) after correction, DF=2.33 mm, HBQ=5.54. The circles in the far-field pattern represent the measured beam diameters.
    Fig. 3. Experimental results with the 3×1 pump-beam array. Near-field intensity distribution (a) before correction, DN=4.09mm and (b) after correction, DN=4.55mm. Far-field intensity distribution (c) before correction, DF=5.10mm, HBQ=10.89 and (d) after correction, DF=2.33mm, HBQ=5.54. The circles in the far-field pattern represent the measured beam diameters.
    Actuators distribution of the DM and the 3×1 beam array.
    Fig. 4. Actuators distribution of the DM and the 3×1 beam array.
    Correction result of the defocus distributed in a 3×1 array. (a) Wavefront before correction. (b) Far-field intensity distribution before correction, HBQ=10.89. (c) Wavefront after correction. (d) Far-field intensity distribution after correction, HBQ=6.44. The far-field intensity distributions were initialized by the peak value of the far-field intensity of an ideal square-flat-topped beam.
    Fig. 5. Correction result of the defocus distributed in a 3×1 array. (a) Wavefront before correction. (b) Far-field intensity distribution before correction, HBQ=10.89. (c) Wavefront after correction. (d) Far-field intensity distribution after correction, HBQ=6.44. The far-field intensity distributions were initialized by the peak value of the far-field intensity of an ideal square-flat-topped beam.
    Correction result of the defocus distributed in a 1×1 array. (a) Wavefront before correction. (b) Far-field beam intensity distribution before correction, HBQ=4.32. (c) Wavefront after correction. (d) Far-field beam intensity distribution after correction, HBQ=1.01.
    Fig. 6. Correction result of the defocus distributed in a 1×1 array. (a) Wavefront before correction. (b) Far-field beam intensity distribution before correction, HBQ=4.32. (c) Wavefront after correction. (d) Far-field beam intensity distribution after correction, HBQ=1.01.
    HBQ after correction with different beam arrays.
    Fig. 7. HBQ after correction with different beam arrays.
    (a) Gain module with a pump-light homogenizer. (b) Simulation pump intensity distribution in a Nd:YAG slab with a pump-light homogenizer.
    Fig. 8. (a) Gain module with a pump-light homogenizer. (b) Simulation pump intensity distribution in a Nd:YAG slab with a pump-light homogenizer.
    Experimental results with the pump-beam array. Near-field intensity distribution (a) before correction, DN=3.01 mm, and (b) after correction, DN=3.31 mm. Far-field intensity distribution (c) before correction, DF=3.49 mm, HBQ=5.49, and (d) after correction, DF=0.91 mm, HBQ=1.57.
    Fig. 9. Experimental results with the pump-beam array. Near-field intensity distribution (a) before correction, DN=3.01mm, and (b) after correction, DN=3.31mm. Far-field intensity distribution (c) before correction, DF=3.49mm, HBQ=5.49, and (d) after correction, DF=0.91mm, HBQ=1.57.
    Array Dimension1×12×12×23×13×3
    PV/μm0.703.726.306.418.74
    RMS/μm0.050.340.521.011.19
    HBQ1.011.702.876.447.22
    Table 1. PV Value, RMS Value, and HBQ of the Defocus Distributed in Different Arrays After Correction
    Licheng Sun, Tinghao Liu, Xing Fu, Yading Guo, Xiaojun Wang, Chongfeng Shao, Yamin Zheng, Chuang Sun, Shibing Lin, Lei Huang. 1.57 times diffraction-limit high-energy laser based on a Nd:YAG slab amplifier and an adaptive optics system[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17(5): 051403
    Download Citation