Author Affiliations
College of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Automatic detection device structure
Fig. 2. LED light source structure
Fig. 3. Flowchart of detection method
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of motion analysis
Fig. 5. Flowchart of quantity statistics and size estimation of suspended solids
Fig. 6. Rotation of suspended solid region
Fig. 7. Physical drawing of experimental device. (a) Appearance drawing; (b) internal structure
Fig. 8. Picture collected in bottle 1. (a) Minuend picture; (b) background picture
Fig. 9. Picture collected in bottle 2. (a) Minuend picture; (b) background picture
Fig. 10. Picture collected in bottle 3. (a) Minuend picture; (b) background picture
Fig. 11. Differential image processing results for the 1st group. (a) Differential image; (b) differential image binarization; (c) denoised image; (d) smooth edge
Fig. 12. Differential image processing results for the 2nd group. (a) Differential image; (b) differential image binarization; (c) denoised image; (d) smooth edge
Fig. 13. Differential image processing results for the 3rd group. (a) Differential image; (b) differential image binarization; (c) denoised image; (d) smooth edge
Number | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 |
---|
Max /mm | Min /mm | Max /mm | Min /mm | Max /mm | Min /mm |
---|
1 | 3.10 | 1.40 | 5.58 | 4.08 | 2.00 | 1.42 | 2 | 3.78 | 1.78 | 5.20 | 3.36 | 1.60 | 0.72 | 3 | 2.80 | 1.60 | 5.30 | 4.24 | 2.20 | 2.14 | 4 | 3.45 | 1.72 | 5.22 | 3.30 | 3.64 | 2.36 | 5 | 3.10 | 2.12 | 4.80 | 2.70 | 7.04 | 4.12 |
|
Table 1. Statistical table of actual size of suspended particles
Number | Actualsize /mm | Detectingsize /mm | Absoluteerror /mm | Relativeerror /% |
---|
1 | 3.10 | 3.14 | 0.04 | 1.29 | 2 | 3.78 | 3.82 | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3 | 2.80 | 2.96 | 0.16 | 5.71 | 4 | 3.45 | 3.68 | 0.23 | 6.67 | 5 | 3.10 | 3.08 | 0.02 | 0.65 |
|
Table 2. Comparison between the detection results and actual size of suspended particles in the 1st group
Number | Actualsize /mm | Detectingsize /mm | Absoluteerror /mm | Relativeerror /% |
---|
1 | 5.58 | 5.86 | 0.28 | 5.02 | 2 | 5.20 | 5.01 | 0.19 | 3.65 | 3 | 5.30 | 5.35 | 0.05 | 0.94 | 4 | 5.22 | 5.26 | 0.04 | 0.77 | 5 | 4.80 | 4.65 | 0.15 | 3.13 |
|
Table 3. Comparison between the detection results and actual size of suspended particles in the 2nd group
Number | Actualsize /mm | Detectingsize /mm | Absoluteerror /mm | Relativeerror /% |
---|
1 | 2.00 | 1.94 | 0.06 | 3.00 | 2 | 1.60 | 1.70 | 0.10 | 6.25 | 3 | 2.20 | 2.35 | 0.15 | 6.82 | 4 | 3.64 | 3.56 | 0.08 | 2.20 | 5 | 7.04 | 7.24 | 0.20 | 2.84 |
|
Table 4. Comparison between the detection results and actual size of suspended particles in the 3rd group