• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 2, 0214001 (2018)
Lingwu Meng1、2, Shuai Shao1、*, and Jian Qiao3
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin 130033, China
  • 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3 School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.0214001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lingwu Meng, Shuai Shao, Jian Qiao. Influence Factors of Bend Flow Resistance in Turbulent Flow of Inner Channel Liquid Cooled Mirror[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(2): 0214001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Inner channel geometry model. (a) Light guide model; (b) inner channel model; (c) inner channel geometry parameter
    Fig. 1. Inner channel geometry model. (a) Light guide model; (b) inner channel model; (c) inner channel geometry parameter
    Pressure loss coefficients varies with channel width a
    Fig. 2. Pressure loss coefficients varies with channel width a
    Velocity contours of bend under different channel widths a
    Fig. 3. Velocity contours of bend under different channel widths a
    Pressure loss coefficient varies with channel height b
    Fig. 4. Pressure loss coefficient varies with channel height b
    Velocity contours of bend under different channel heights b
    Fig. 5. Velocity contours of bend under different channel heights b
    Pressure loss coefficient varies with channel interval e
    Fig. 6. Pressure loss coefficient varies with channel interval e
    Velocity contours of bend under different channel intervals e
    Fig. 7. Velocity contours of bend under different channel intervals e
    Pressure loss coefficient varies with bend width c
    Fig. 8. Pressure loss coefficient varies with bend width c
    Velocity contours of bend under different bend widths c
    Fig. 9. Velocity contours of bend under different bend widths c
    Pressure loss coefficient varies with bend width c
    Fig. 10. Pressure loss coefficient varies with bend width c
    Velocity contours of bend under different bend width c
    Fig. 11. Velocity contours of bend under different bend width c
    Pressure loss coefficient varies with flow velocities v
    Fig. 12. Pressure loss coefficient varies with flow velocities v
    Velocity contours of bend under different flow velocities v
    Fig. 13. Velocity contours of bend under different flow velocities v
    Pressure loss coefficient varies with coolant volume fraction
    Fig. 14. Pressure loss coefficient varies with coolant volume fraction
    Velocity contours of bend under different coolant volume fractions
    Fig. 15. Velocity contours of bend under different coolant volume fractions
    MaterialVolumefraction /%Density /(kg∙m-3)Specific heat /(kJ∙kg-1∙K-1)Heat conductivity /(W∙m-1∙K-1)Viscosity /(103 kg∙m-1∙s-1)
    Copper8933.000.380391
    Glycol aqueous solution01000.004.1820.6001.003
    401059.683.4680.4152.960
    451066.523.3750.3983.450
    501073.353.2810.3803.940
    551079.813.1830.3654.660
    601086.273.0840.3495.380
    Table 1. Physical properties of copper and glycol aqueous solution
    Lingwu Meng, Shuai Shao, Jian Qiao. Influence Factors of Bend Flow Resistance in Turbulent Flow of Inner Channel Liquid Cooled Mirror[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(2): 0214001
    Download Citation