• Advanced Photonics Nexus
  • Vol. 4, Issue 1, 016005 (2025)
Zhen Wang1, Shuxin Liu1, Jingchi Li1, Yong Zhang1..., Xinyuan Fang2, Qiwen Zhan3 and Yikai Su1,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Department of Electronic Engineering and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai, China
  • 2University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, School of Artificial Intelligence Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
  • 3University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, Shanghai, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1117/1.APN.4.1.016005 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhen Wang, Shuxin Liu, Jingchi Li, Yong Zhang, Xinyuan Fang, Qiwen Zhan, Yikai Su, "Ultrawide field-of-view integrated optical phased arrays employing multiple orbital angular momentum beams," Adv. Photon. Nexus 4, 016005 (2025) Copy Citation Text show less
    Working principle of emitting OAM beams with different topological charges using an on-chip OPA. (a) Schematic of the proposed OAM OPA chip, detailing the essential components and interconnection structures. (b) Method of generating the proposed multiple-OAM OPA. The etching pattern of the forked grating is achieved using a spiral phase distribution (l=1) and a 1×3 Dammann grating array. The layout of the multiple-OAM OPA is the intersection of the forked grating and the waveguide array.
    Fig. 1. Working principle of emitting OAM beams with different topological charges using an on-chip OPA. (a) Schematic of the proposed OAM OPA chip, detailing the essential components and interconnection structures. (b) Method of generating the proposed multiple-OAM OPA. The etching pattern of the forked grating is achieved using a spiral phase distribution (l=1) and a 1×3 Dammann grating array. The layout of the multiple-OAM OPA is the intersection of the forked grating and the waveguide array.
    (a) Schematic of the designed 1×3 Dammann grating. The grating pitch (Λ) is 2.6 μm, and the lengths of the various segments within the grating are L1=0.838 μm, L2=0.160 μm, L3=0.666 μm, L4=0.349 μm, L5=0.282 μm, and L6=0.305 μm. (b) Emitted diffraction orders +3, +4, and +5 of far-field patterns with the left input as a function of wavelength. The red regions indicate the blind zone. (c) Far-field patterns with left and right inputs as a function of wavelength. The dashed box indicates that six diffractions (orders ±3 through ±5) with bidirectional inputs cover a 180-deg FOV in the wavelength range of 1510 to 1630 nm. (d) Spacing between the waveguide and grating as a function of distance before and after PSO. (e) Schematic of the WG-DC structure. (f) Optical power distributions within the proposed WG-DC structure at 1510, 1570, and 1630 nm. The power distributions at these wavelengths resemble Gaussian distributions.
    Fig. 2. (a) Schematic of the designed 1×3 Dammann grating. The grating pitch (Λ) is 2.6  μm, and the lengths of the various segments within the grating are L1=0.838  μm, L2=0.160  μm, L3=0.666  μm, L4=0.349  μm, L5=0.282  μm, and L6=0.305  μm. (b) Emitted diffraction orders +3, +4, and +5 of far-field patterns with the left input as a function of wavelength. The red regions indicate the blind zone. (c) Far-field patterns with left and right inputs as a function of wavelength. The dashed box indicates that six diffractions (orders ±3 through ±5) with bidirectional inputs cover a 180-deg FOV in the wavelength range of 1510 to 1630 nm. (d) Spacing between the waveguide and grating as a function of distance before and after PSO. (e) Schematic of the WG-DC structure. (f) Optical power distributions within the proposed WG-DC structure at 1510, 1570, and 1630 nm. The power distributions at these wavelengths resemble Gaussian distributions.
    Simulated and measured far-field intensities for vertical emission (φ=0 deg). (a) Simulated far-field patterns, amplitudes, and phase profiles of three orders (+3, +4, and +5) at 1565 nm with left input. (b) Measured far-field intensities and interference patterns of the emitted OAM lights. (c) Measured far-field intensity profiles of the y-polarized OAM+4 at 1565 nm following a rotation of the polarizer (0, 45, and 90 deg). The arrows indicate the angles of the polarizer. (d) Zoomed-in and microscopic images of the packaged device, consisting of the 3.5 mm×4.5 mm multiple OAM OPA chip wire bonded to a silicon interposer, along with left and right optical fiber inputs. (e) Experimental setup used to characterize the far-field profiles of the multibeam OPA (laser: Keysight 81960A). PC, polarization controller; VOA, variable optical attenuator; HWP, half-wave plate; P1 and P2, polarizers; BS, beam splitter; L1, L2, and L3, lenses; IR-CCD, infrared charge-coupled device. Inset: FoM versus iteration and far-field profiles before and after phase alignment.
    Fig. 3. Simulated and measured far-field intensities for vertical emission (φ=0  deg). (a) Simulated far-field patterns, amplitudes, and phase profiles of three orders (+3, +4, and +5) at 1565 nm with left input. (b) Measured far-field intensities and interference patterns of the emitted OAM lights. (c) Measured far-field intensity profiles of the y-polarized OAM+4 at 1565 nm following a rotation of the polarizer (0, 45, and 90 deg). The arrows indicate the angles of the polarizer. (d) Zoomed-in and microscopic images of the packaged device, consisting of the 3.5  mm×4.5  mm multiple OAM OPA chip wire bonded to a silicon interposer, along with left and right optical fiber inputs. (e) Experimental setup used to characterize the far-field profiles of the multibeam OPA (laser: Keysight 81960A). PC, polarization controller; VOA, variable optical attenuator; HWP, half-wave plate; P1 and P2, polarizers; BS, beam splitter; L1, L2, and L3, lenses; IR-CCD, infrared charge-coupled device. Inset: FoM versus iteration and far-field profiles before and after phase alignment.
    Simulated and measured far-field intensities of emitted multiple vortices with different wavelength inputs. (a) and (b) Simulated and measured far-field emission patterns in a wavelength range from 1480 to 1640 nm with left input (up) and left and right inputs (down), respectively. (c) Angle sweeping of emitted diffraction orders ±3, ±4, and ±5 with bidirectional inputs. (d) Measured far fields of multiple vortices at different emission angles with respect to the φ axis.
    Fig. 4. Simulated and measured far-field intensities of emitted multiple vortices with different wavelength inputs. (a) and (b) Simulated and measured far-field emission patterns in a wavelength range from 1480 to 1640 nm with left input (up) and left and right inputs (down), respectively. (c) Angle sweeping of emitted diffraction orders ±3, ±4, and ±5 with bidirectional inputs. (d) Measured far fields of multiple vortices at different emission angles with respect to the φ axis.
    Zhen Wang, Shuxin Liu, Jingchi Li, Yong Zhang, Xinyuan Fang, Qiwen Zhan, Yikai Su, "Ultrawide field-of-view integrated optical phased arrays employing multiple orbital angular momentum beams," Adv. Photon. Nexus 4, 016005 (2025)
    Download Citation