Fig. 1. 10 types of target optical images and corresponding SAR images
Fig. 2. ResNet101 precision curve
Fig. 3. SENet structure
Fig. 4. Residual shrinkage block
Fig. 5. Structure diagram of model S
Fig. 6. Concrete structure of the first stage
Fig. 7. Occlusion effect pictures
Fig. 8. Pictures of salt and pepper noise
Category | Number of samples in training set | Number of samples in test set |
---|
2S1 | 299 | 274 | BMP2 | 232 | 196 | BRDM-2 | 298 | 274 | BTR-60 | 256 | 195 | BTR-70 | 233 | 196 | D7 | 299 | 274 | T62 | 299 | 273 | T72 | 232 | 196 | ZIL131 | 299 | 274 | ZSU-23_4 | 299 | 274 |
|
Table 1. Data category and number of samples
Algorithm | Number of parameters /107 | Recognition rate in training set | Recognition rate in test set | Time /s |
---|
ResNet50 | 2.5 | 99.4 | 97.9 | 1760 | ResNet101 | 4.5 | 90.7 | 90.9 | 2426 | Inception ResNetV2 | 5.5 | 88.1 | 94.5 | 7967 |
|
Table 2. Recognition rates of different algorithms
Number of parameters /107 | Recognition rate in training set /% | Recognition rate in test set /% | Training time /s |
---|
3.2 | 99.5 | 98.9 | 4023 |
|
Table 3. Recognition rate of original residual attention network
Stage | Number of parameters /107 | Recognition rate in training set /% | Recognition rate in test set /% | Training time /s |
---|
3 | 1.1 | 99.5 | 98.9 | | 2 | 1.2 | 99.5 | 99.4 | | 1 | 1.5 | 99.7 | 99.6 | 2850 | 0 | 3.2 | 99.5 | 98.9 | 4023 |
|
Table 4. Experimental results of different improvement stages
Model | Average recognition rate /% |
---|
Model S | 99.6 | CMNet model[25] | 99.3 | Faster R-CNN model[26] | 99.1 | A-ConvNets model | 98.1 | SVM model[27] | 90.0 |
|
Table 5. Recognition results of different models
Noise ratio /% | 5 | 15 | 20 | 30 | 35 |
---|
Recognition rate /% | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 |
|
Table 6. Occlusion recognition results
Noise ratio /% | 5 | 10 | 15 |
---|
Recognition rate /% | 96 | 88 | 82 |
|
Table 7. Recognition results of model under salt and pepper noise