• Journal of Resources and Ecology
  • Vol. 11, Issue 4, 378 (2020)
Zahia KEBBOUCHE1、1, Abdelaziz TAIRI1、1, and Brahim SAFI2、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Processes Engineering, Faculty of Hydrocarbons and Chemistry, University M’hamed Bougara of Boumerdes, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria
  • 1M'hamed Bougara大学碳氢化合物与化学学院化学与制药工艺工程系,布米尔达斯 35000, 阿尔及利亚
  • 2Department of Engineering Process, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University M’hamed Bougara of Boumerdes, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria
  • 2M'hamed Bougara大学工程科学学院工程过程系, 布米尔达斯 35000, 阿尔及利亚
  • show less
    DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.04.006 Cite this Article
    Zahia KEBBOUCHE, Abdelaziz TAIRI, Brahim SAFI. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Truck Bumper Produced in the Algerian Auto Industry[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(4): 378 Copy Citation Text show less
    Fig. 1
    Fig. 1. Fig. 1
    Fig. 2
    Fig. 2. Fig. 2
    Fig. 3
    Fig. 3. Fig. 3
    Fig. 4
    Fig. 4. Fig. 4
    Fig. 5
    Fig. 5. Fig. 5
    Fig. 6
    Fig. 6. Fig. 6
    Fig. 7
    Fig. 7. Fig. 7
    Part numberSubsetNature of sheetMetal weight (kg)ProcessOperation range
    668085 (A)-TC14.1055190 8 kW 6 barCut flan, punch, smash, Notching, controlfold one edge R = B, fold R = 15, control
    55820 2 ch 6 bar
    55170 11 kW 6 bar
    56170, 56540, 56540
    668086 (B) 668087 (C)-XES0.86655120, 56180, 56180Cut blank, Cut out blank, Coining, Controlled
    668088 (D)668089 (D′)XES0.86655120, 55820, 56180, 56180, 56540Cut blank, Punch, Notch (4 angles), Fold, Control, Bend ends, Control
    663302 (D″)XES0.19255190, 55820, 56180Cut blank, Punch, Fold 2 edges, Control
    Table 1.

    Steel bumper component

    ProductsMajor chemical constituentsQuantity
    Systoclean 2118/504 (dégraissage)Sodium hydroxide NaOH (C>10 %)45 g
    Addistrip 2252 (décappage)Hydrochloric acid HCL (C>25 %)0.5 L
    Neutrax n°1Sodium nitrate NaNO3 (C>20 %)20 g
    Systophose 4605Phosphoric acid (C>25 %)0.020 L
    Rinspas 19Hydrofluozirconic acid and acid Fluozirconic0.002 L
    WaterH2O60 L
    Table 2.

    Products used for surface treatments and painting (steel bumper)

    ProductsMajor chemical constituentsQuantity
    Fiberglass layerFiberglass1200 g m-2
    ResinPolyester2800 g
    BUTANOX M-50Methyl Ethyl Ketone Peroxide PMC56 g
    Oc6Cobalt octoate56 g
    Gel coatPaint resin448 g
    AcetoneDiluentSmall quantity
    WaxRelease fat20 g
    Table 3.

    Materials used for the polyester bumper

    Chemical compositionConcentration (%)
    MgO1.141
    Al2O310.298
    SiO244.161
    SO30.764
    K2O0.476
    CaO35.048
    Fe2O31.872
    Table 4.

    Chemical composition in cutting and preparation of fiberglass

    Chemical compositionConcentration (%)
    MgO0.230
    Al2O31.775
    SiO27.314
    P2O50.910
    SO30.118
    K2O0.118
    CaO7.488
    TiO20.630
    Fe2O30.448
    Cl13.770
    Table 5.

    Chemical composition in deburring finished part

    Chemical compositionConcentration (%)
    Cr2O30.010
    MgO0.087
    Al2O30.598
    SiO22.656
    P2O50.460
    SO30.088
    CaO4.498
    TiO20.371
    Fe2O30.698
    PbO3.673
    Cl8.981
    Table 6.

    Chemical composition in finishing part

    Zahia KEBBOUCHE, Abdelaziz TAIRI, Brahim SAFI. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Truck Bumper Produced in the Algerian Auto Industry[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(4): 378
    Download Citation