Author Affiliations
11. School of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China22. State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials (iChEM), College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. The distribution with the original data and middle 99% data
Fig. 2. Spike removal of 1-dimensional spectra with different window size and threshold
a: Raw spectrum; b: Spike removal with window size 7, threshold 1×10-5; c: Spike removal with window size 3, threshold 1×10-5; d: Spike removal with window size 7, threshold 1×10-3; e: Spike removal with window size 3, threshold 1×10-3. Arbitrary offsets were applied on the spectra for better visualization
Fig. 3. 1-dimensional Raman spectra spike removal process
a: Raw Raman spectrum; b: Raman Spectrum after 1-dimensional spike removal. Arbitrary offsets were applied on the spectra for better visualization
Fig. 4. 1-dimensional spectrum with artificial spikes
(a): Raman spectrum after spike removal; (b): Raman spectrum with 0.1 times artificial spikes;(c): Raman spectrum with 0.2 times artificial spikes; (d): Raman spectrum with 0.3 times artificial spikes; (e): Raman spectrum with 0.4 times artificial spikes; (f): Raman spectrum with 0.5 times artificial spikes
Fig. 5. 2-dimensional Raman image spike removal process
(a): Raw Raman image; (b): Raman image after 2-dimensional spike removal
Fig. 6. 3-dimensional Raman data cube spike removal process
(a): Raw Raman data cube; (b): Raman data cube after 3-dimensional spike removal
Input raw Raman data M, Window size W, |
---|
Threshold θ, Dimension D; | 1 Data N=Median(M, W); | 2 Deviation E=M-N; | 3 Distribution F=Fit(middle 99% E); | 4 Value V1=F(θ), V2=F(1-θ); | 5 If E(I)<V1 or E(I)>V2 | 6 Replace M(I) by N(I); | 7 Endif | Output Data M |
|
Table 1. Flowchart of algorithm
Ratios | Predicted | True | Percentage/% |
---|
0.1 | 175 | 200 | 87.5 | 0.2 | 195 | 200 | 97.5 | 0.3 | 197 | 200 | 98.5 | 0.4 | 199 | 200 | 99.5 |
|
Table 2. 1-dimensional Raman spectra spike detection
Ratios | Predicted | True | Percentage/% |
---|
0.1 | 174 | 200 | 87 | 0.2 | 194 | 200 | 97 | 0.3 | 199 | 200 | 99.5 |
|
Table 3. 2-dimensional Raman image spike detection
Ratios | Predicted | True | Percentage/% |
---|
0.1 | 186 | 200 | 93 | 0.2 | 199 | 200 | 99.5 |
|
Table 4. 3-dimensional Raman data cube spike detection