Author Affiliations
1College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin , China2National Defense Key Laboratory of Air Ground Laser Communication, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin , Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of one-to-four networking of space laser communication
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of main optical transceiver and its optical system. (a) Outline drawing of main optical transceiver; (b) schematic diagram of optical system (single path)
Fig. 3. Layout diagram of one-to-four networking of space laser communication
Fig. 4. Dynamic modeling analysis. (a) Schematic diagram of one-to-one experiment of space laser communication; (b) diagram of angular velocity and angular acceleration change
Fig. 5. Amplitude-frequency characteristic curve of speed loop
Fig. 6. Amplitude-frequency characteristic curve of position loop
Fig. 7. Block diagram of tracking system model
Fig. 8. Influence diagram of speed lag compensation parameters. (a) Tracking error; (b) phase margin; (c) overshoot
Fig. 9. Influence diagram of acceleration lag compensation parameters. (a) Tracking error; (b) phase margin; (c) overshoot
Fig. 10. Equivalent sine steady state tracking error curve
Fig. 11. Equivalent motion attitude tracking error curve
Fig. 12. Equivalent disturbance tracking error curve
Fig. 13. Coarse tracking experiment of main optical transceiver in networking
Fig. 14. Tracking error curve of disturbance experimental test
Fig. 15. Tracking error curve of motion attitude experimental test
| Beacon light band | Communication optical band |
---|
Main optical transceiver | 810 | 1550 | Slave optical transceiver | 850 | 1530 |
|
Table 1. Wavelengths for communication between main and slave optical transceivers
Sensitivity analysis index | Velocity delay compensation index | Acceleration delay compensation index |
---|
α | T2 | β | T3 |
---|
First-order index | 33.9439 | 9.8120 | 3.5998 | 1.8330 | Total-effect index | 10.2007 | 0.8813 | 2.3261 | 0.5594 |
|
Table 2. Sensitivity analysis of velocity and acceleration parameters
Simulation target | Control method | Maximum tracking error /μrad | Accuracy of ascension |
---|
Motion disturbance coupling | Without compensation | 1109 | - | Velocity delay compensation | 320 | 3.47 | Acceleration delay compensation | 46 | 24.11 | Equivalent disturbance | Without compensation | 873 | - | Velocity delay compensation | 285 | 3.06 | Acceleration delay compensation | 11 | 79.36 | Equivalent movement | Without compensation | 238 | - | Velocity delay compensation | 47 | 5.06 | Acceleration delay compensation | 46 | 5.17 |
|
Table 3. Tracking error results of simulation experiment
Simulation target | Control method | Maximum tracking error /μrad | Accuracy of ascension |
---|
Equivalent disturbance | Without compensation | 988.09 | —— | Velocity delay compensation | 369.65 | 2.67 | Acceleration delay compensation | 58.12 | 17.00 | Equivalent movement | Without compensation | 285.21 | —— | Velocity delay compensation | 57.42 | 4.97 | Acceleration delay compensation | 56.86 | 5.02 |
|
Table 4. Tracking error results of actual experiment