• Matter and Radiation at Extremes
  • Vol. 5, Issue 4, 044401 (2020)
M. F. Ciappina1、2, E. E. Peganov3、4, and S. V. Popruzhenko4、a)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Physics of the ASCR, ELI-Beamlines Project, Na Slovance 2, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic
  • 2ICFO—Institut de Ciencies Fotoniques, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss 3, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain
  • 3National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Kashirskoe Ave. 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia
  • 4Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov Str. 38, 119991 Moscow, Russia
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1063/5.0005380 Cite this Article
    M. F. Ciappina, E. E. Peganov, S. V. Popruzhenko. Focal-shape effects on the efficiency of the tunnel-ionization probe for extreme laser intensities[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2020, 5(4): 044401 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic illustration of the notation in Eqs. (8)–(11).
    Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of the notation in Eqs. (8)–(11).
    Normalized distributions of the effective intensity [Eq. (1)] in the planes (x, y, z = 0) (a), (x, y = 0, z) (c), and (x = 0, y, z) (d) for the NF beam with Δ = 0.178 corresponding to the parameters λ = 1 µm and w0 = 3 µm of the Gaussian beam [Eq. (6)]. (b) shows the cuts x = 0 (solid red line) and y = 0 (solid blue line) of the (x, y, z = 0) distribution in (a). The dashed lines show the analogous cuts for the NF beam with Δ = 0.35.
    Fig. 2. Normalized distributions of the effective intensity [Eq. (1)] in the planes (x, y, z = 0) (a), (x, y = 0, z) (c), and (x = 0, y, z) (d) for the NF beam with Δ = 0.178 corresponding to the parameters λ = 1 µm and w0 = 3 µm of the Gaussian beam [Eq. (6)]. (b) shows the cuts x = 0 (solid red line) and y = 0 (solid blue line) of the (x, y, z = 0) distribution in (a). The dashed lines show the analogous cuts for the NF beam with Δ = 0.35.
    Number of ions vs peak laser intensity calculated from Eq. (5) for argon (a), krypton (b), and xenon (c) using the intensity distributions for the Gaussian (solid lines) and NF (dashed lines) beams. The beam parameters are the same as in Fig. 2. For argon and for Xe51+ and Xe52+, the results corresponding to the tightly focused NF beam with Δ = 0.35 are shown by dash-dotted lines. The gray areas indicate the interval N(Ak+) = 10–100 where the number of ions grows by one order of magnitude. The values of I10 and I100 given in Table I are indicated by filled and open circles, respectively. The values of I0 where the numbers of two selected charge states become equal are shown by open squares for the Gaussian beam and by open triangles for the NF beam. For the pair of states Xe51+ and Xe52+, the values of I0 for the two beams are difficult to distinguish visually, and so the corresponding triangle symbol is omitted. Vertical lines indicate the threshold intensities calculated from the analytic estimate in Eq. (13).
    Fig. 3. Number of ions vs peak laser intensity calculated from Eq. (5) for argon (a), krypton (b), and xenon (c) using the intensity distributions for the Gaussian (solid lines) and NF (dashed lines) beams. The beam parameters are the same as in Fig. 2. For argon and for Xe51+ and Xe52+, the results corresponding to the tightly focused NF beam with Δ = 0.35 are shown by dash-dotted lines. The gray areas indicate the interval N(Ak+) = 10–100 where the number of ions grows by one order of magnitude. The values of I10 and I100 given in Table I are indicated by filled and open circles, respectively. The values of I0 where the numbers of two selected charge states become equal are shown by open squares for the Gaussian beam and by open triangles for the NF beam. For the pair of states Xe51+ and Xe52+, the values of I0 for the two beams are difficult to distinguish visually, and so the corresponding triangle symbol is omitted. Vertical lines indicate the threshold intensities calculated from the analytic estimate in Eq. (13).
    Derivative d⁡log(N)/d⁡log(I) for Ar17+ (a) and Xe52+ (b) calculated for the parameters of Fig. 3. Solid curves correspond to the Gaussian beam and dash-dotted curves to the NF beam. Δ = 0.178 for the blue curves and Δ = 0.35 for the red curves.
    Fig. 4. Derivative dlog(N)/dlog(I) for Ar17+ (a) and Xe52+ (b) calculated for the parameters of Fig. 3. Solid curves correspond to the Gaussian beam and dash-dotted curves to the NF beam. Δ = 0.178 for the blue curves and Δ = 0.35 for the red curves.
    IonIp (eV)I10GI10NFI100GI100NFI0GI0NFI
    Ar17+41201717 (25)2323 (98)564524
    Ar18+44262425313230
    Kr27+29294.14.15.55.732628.8
    Kr34+41081111141424
    Xe51+96078687118120151140310
    Xe52+9812110106 (145)130130 (381)330
    Xe53+40 2721.2 × 1041.2 × 1041.6 × 1041.7 × 1042.7 × 1042.5 × 1042.3 × 104
    Xe54+41 3001.6 × 1041.6 × 1042.1 × 1042.0 × 1042.5 × 104
    Table 1. Reference intensity values for ion yields shown in Fig. 3: I10 and I100 are the intensities corresponding to N(Ak+) = 10 and N(Ak+) = 100, respectively, I0 is the value of intensity such that N(Ak+) = N(A(k+1)+), and I is given by the analytic estimate in Eq. (13). Intensities are given in units of 1020 W/cm2. The parameters of the laser beams are w0 = 3 µm, λ = 1 µm, and Δ = 0.178. Values of I10 and I100 for the NF beam with Δ = 0.35 are shown in parentheses for Ar17+ and Xe52+.
    M. F. Ciappina, E. E. Peganov, S. V. Popruzhenko. Focal-shape effects on the efficiency of the tunnel-ionization probe for extreme laser intensities[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2020, 5(4): 044401
    Download Citation