• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 52, Issue 11, 20230138 (2023)
Xiong Luo1,2, Yue Shi1,3, Qi Fan1,2, Wei Yin1,2..., Tao Peng1,2, Peie Zhao1,2, Ke Wang1,2 and Dingfu Zhou1,2,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Southwest Institute of Technical Physics, Chengdu 610041, China
  • 2Lidar and Devices Laboratory of Sichuan, Chengdu 610041, China
  • 3Science College, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20230138 Cite this Article
    Xiong Luo, Yue Shi, Qi Fan, Wei Yin, Tao Peng, Peie Zhao, Ke Wang, Dingfu Zhou. Meteorological multi-element detection based on coherent lidar[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(11): 20230138 Copy Citation Text show less
    The composition chart of coherent wind lidar
    Fig. 1. The composition chart of coherent wind lidar
    Cloud height algorithm
    Fig. 2. Cloud height algorithm
    Comparision of lidar and Vaisala laser-ceilometer cloud height data. (a) Time series diagram; (b) Scatter diagram
    Fig. 3. Comparision of lidar and Vaisala laser-ceilometer cloud height data. (a) Time series diagram; (b) Scatter diagram
    Comparision of lidar and visibility meter data. (a) Time series diagram; (b) Scatter diagram
    Fig. 4. Comparision of lidar and visibility meter data. (a) Time series diagram; (b) Scatter diagram
    Experimental scene
    Fig. 5. Experimental scene
    Extinction coefficient comparison in haze day. (a) 1550 nm coherent lidar; (b) 532 nm aerosol lidar
    Fig. 6. Extinction coefficient comparison in haze day. (a) 1550 nm coherent lidar; (b) 532 nm aerosol lidar
    Extinction coefficient comparison in clear day. (a) 1550 nm coherent lidar; (b) 532 nm aerosol lidar
    Fig. 7. Extinction coefficient comparison in clear day. (a) 1550 nm coherent lidar; (b) 532 nm aerosol lidar
    Extinction coefficient comparison in overcast and rainy day. (a) 1550 nm coherent lidar; (b) 532 nm aerosol lidar
    Fig. 8. Extinction coefficient comparison in overcast and rainy day. (a) 1550 nm coherent lidar; (b) 532 nm aerosol lidar
    Extinction coefficient comparison in foggy day. (a) 1550 nm coherent lidar; (b) 532 nm aerosol lidar
    Fig. 9. Extinction coefficient comparison in foggy day. (a) 1550 nm coherent lidar; (b) 532 nm aerosol lidar
    ParameterValue
    Wavelength/μm1.55
    Pulse energy/μJ150
    Pulse repetition rate/kHz10
    Temporal resolution/s≤1
    Range resolution/m15-200 (adjustable)
    Wind speed accuracy/m·s–10.3
    Wind direction accuracy/(°)3
    Table 1. System parameters of the coherent wind lidar
    System parameterThe coherent wind lidarThe aerosol lidar
    Wavelength/nm1550532
    Detection modeCoherent detectionDirect detection
    Range/km1015
    AntennaT-R combine, 100 mmT-R separate, 160 mm
    Pulse energy/μJ15020
    Pulse repetition rate10 0002 000
    Data productsWind; Extinction coefficient; Visibility; Aerosol concentrationExtinction coefficient; Visibility; PM10 concentration; PM2.5 concentration; Depolarization ratio
    AdvantagesNo bland zone, without geometric factor correction; Eye-safe; High sensitivity, high time resolution, secondary data acquisition timeVisible light, closer to human visibility
    DisadvantagesInvisible light, data conversion requiredLong acquisition time; Not eye-safe; Bland zone, geometric factor correction required
    Table 2. System parameters of the coherent wind lidar and aerosol lidar
    Xiong Luo, Yue Shi, Qi Fan, Wei Yin, Tao Peng, Peie Zhao, Ke Wang, Dingfu Zhou. Meteorological multi-element detection based on coherent lidar[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(11): 20230138
    Download Citation