• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 14, 1404003 (2021)
Wenjie Yan1, Wenhui Lu2, and Jifen Wang1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Investigation, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 102600, China
  • 2Henan Police College, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1404003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Wenjie Yan, Wenhui Lu, Jifen Wang. Research on Spectral Recognition of Drug Mixture Based on SVM-MLP Fusion Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1404003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Distribution of contribution rate of each component
    Fig. 1. Distribution of contribution rate of each component
    Schematic diagram of support vector machine
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of support vector machine
    Accuracy comparison chart
    Fig. 3. Accuracy comparison chart
    MLP simple structure schematic diagram
    Fig. 4. MLP simple structure schematic diagram
    Classification effects diagram of two models under different training ratios
    Fig. 5. Classification effects diagram of two models under different training ratios
    SamplesHeroin quality /mgAdditivesAdditive quality /mgHeroin mass score
    10.5Caffeine4.50.1
    20.5Glucose4.50.1
    30.5Phenacetin4.50.1
    40.5Starch4.50.1
    50.5Sucrose4.50.1
    61.0Caffeine4.00.2
    71.0Glucose4.00.2
    81.0Phenacetin4.00.2
    91.0Starch4.00.2
    101.0Sucrose4.00.2
    111.5Caffeine3.50.3
    121.5Glucose3.50.3
    131.5Phenacetin3.50.3
    141.5Starch3.50.3
    151.5Sucrose3.50.3
    162.0Caffeine3.00.4
    172.0Glucose3.00.4
    SamplesHeroin quality /mgAdditivesAdditive quality /mgHeroin mass score
    182.0Phenacetin3.00.4
    192.0Starch3.00.4
    202.0Sucrose3.00.4
    212.5Caffeine2.50.5
    222.5Glucose2.50.5
    232.5Phenacetin2.50.5
    242.5Starch2.50.5
    252.5Sucrose2.50.5
    263.0Caffeine2.00.6
    273.0Glucose2.00.6
    283.0Phenacetin2.00.6
    293.0Starch2.00.6
    303.0Sucrose2.00.6
    313.5Caffeine1.50.7
    323.5Glucose1.50.7
    333.5Phenacetin1.50.7
    343.5Starch1.50.7
    353.5Sucrose1.50.7
    364.0Caffeine1.00.8
    374.0Glucose1.00.8
    384.0Phenacetin1.00.8
    394.0Starch1.00.8
    404.0Sucrose1.00.8
    414.5Caffeine0.50.9
    424.5Glucose0.50.9
    434.5Phenacetin0.50.9
    444.5Starch0.50.9
    454.5Sucrose0.50.9
    460.5Caffeine4.50.1
    470.5Glucose4.50.1
    480.5Paracetamol4.50.1
    490.5Phenacetin4.50.1
    500.5Starch4.50.1
    511.0Caffeine4.00.2
    521.0Glucose4.00.2
    531.0Paracetamol4.00.2
    541.0Phenacetin4.00.2
    551.0Starch4.00.2
    561.5Caffeine3.50.3
    571.5Glucose3.50.3
    581.5Paracetamol3.50.3
    SamplesHeroin quality /mgAdditivesAdditive quality /mgHeroin mass score
    591.5Phenacetin3.50.3
    601.5Starch3.50.3
    612.0Caffeine3.00.4
    622.0Glucose3.00.4
    632.0Paracetamol3.00.4
    642.0Phenacetin3.00.4
    652.0Starch3.00.4
    662.5Caffeine2.50.5
    672.5Glucose2.50.5
    682.5Paracetamol2.50.5
    692.5Phenacetin2.50.5
    702.5Starch2.50.5
    713.0Caffeine2.00.6
    723.0Glucose2.00.6
    733.0Paracetamol2.00.6
    743.0Phenacetin2.00.6
    753.0Starch2.00.6
    763.5Caffeine1.50.7
    773.5Glucose1.50.7
    783.5Paracetamol1.50.7
    793.5Phenacetin1.50.7
    803.5Starch1.50.7
    814.0Caffeine1.00.8
    824.0Glucose1.00.8
    834.0Paracetamol1.00.8
    844.0Phenacetin1.00.8
    854.0Starch1.00.8
    864.5Caffeine0.50.9
    874.5Glucose0.50.9
    884.5Paracetamol0.50.9
    894.5Phenacetin0.50.9
    904.5Starch0.50.9
    Table 1. Composition of heroin and methamphetamine mixed sample
    Sample namePCA1PCA2PCA3PCA4PCA5PCA6PCA7PCA8
    Heroin 10-1.734991.05294-0.244040.546951.238301.86434-0.850630.30997
    Heroin 20-1.387421.08753-0.493410.631361.240091.91988-0.823600.01083
    Heroin 30-1.361641.31395-0.466240.024190.534901.559770.996590.82939
    Heroin 40-1.265951.30657-0.48177-0.022750.570381.412930.986880.84195
    Heroin 50-1.426311.11977-0.43161-0.064170.419471.822240.551250.68340
    Methamphetamine 10-1.828490.65761-0.191630.392331.023522.11987-1.598720.70246
    Methamphetamine 20-1.62927-0.30444-0.28452-0.265240.565801.76207-1.451150.99943
    Methamphetamine 30-1.61720-0.11446-0.20642-0.041460.626001.77511-0.812980.14576
    Methamphetamine 40-1.37645-0.47555-0.20890-0.025130.679961.46555-0.434670.06310
    Methamphetamine 50-1.27684-0.60591-0.35037-0.091530.580281.56357-0.939700.27797
    Sample namePCA9PCA10PCA11PCA12PCA13PCA14PCA15
    Heroin 100.668740.048750.146640.230640.50656-0.152180.11773
    Heroin 200.96444-0.503030.214010.478141.49474-0.32094-0.05898
    Heroin 301.406140.641590.527900.61595-0.820690.88689-0.50806
    Heroin 401.352710.368990.558410.43866-0.341790.78488-0.37276
    Heroin 501.194630.667210.215361.00858-0.250170.69153-0.39813
    Methamphetamine 100.188010.11184-0.28867-0.68909-0.52643-0.590250.38801
    Methamphetamine 20-0.120650.07006-0.46789-0.04990-0.34572-0.955160.10060
    Methamphetamine 300.462650.17059-0.36223-0.22779-0.59669-0.41832-0.08377
    Methamphetamine 400.582640.26791-0.275220.823190.05651-0.76757-0.06932
    Methamphetamine 500.323920.04199-0.441180.035760.18528-0.673030.35902
    Table 2. Principal component analysis scores of partial data
    FunctionComprehensive classification accuracyHeroin classification accuracyClassification accuracy of methamphetamine
    RBF-SVM48.997.80
    Polynomial-SVM47.895.60
    Sigmoid-SVM35.671.20
    Linear-SVM48.997.80
    Table 3. Accuracy of sample classification under four kernel functions unit: %
    GamaNumber of heroin samplesNumber of correctly classified samplesClassification accuracy /%
    0.01453986.7
    0.05453986.7
    0.10454395.6
    1.00454395.6
    10.00454395.6
    100.00454395.6
    Table 4. Classification effect with polynomial SVM model with different Gamma values
    Training sample ratioConstitutionAdditives
    5084.996.5
    6080.491.5
    7077.891.9
    8074.285.9
    9071.188.4
    Table 5. Average classification accuracy under different training ratios unit: %
    Wenjie Yan, Wenhui Lu, Jifen Wang. Research on Spectral Recognition of Drug Mixture Based on SVM-MLP Fusion Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1404003
    Download Citation