• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 43, Issue 6, 0612009 (2023)
Jinqiang Yang1、2、3, Ruifang Yang2、3、*, Nanjing Zhao2、3、**, Gaofang Yin2、3, Mingjun Ma2、3, Li Fang2、3, Gaoyong Shi1、2、3, Liangchen Liu1、2、3, Desuo Meng4, and Wenqing Liu2、3
Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics and Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, China Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Optical Monitoring Technology for Environment of Anhui Province, Hefei 230031, Anhui, China
  • 4Huainan Normal University, Huainan 232000, Anhui, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS221531 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jinqiang Yang, Ruifang Yang, Nanjing Zhao, Gaofang Yin, Mingjun Ma, Li Fang, Gaoyong Shi, Liangchen Liu, Desuo Meng, Wenqing Liu. In-situ Detection of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Pollutants in Soil by Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2023, 43(6): 0612009 Copy Citation Text show less
    Three-dimensional fluorescence spectra of diesel engine oil
    Fig. 1. Three-dimensional fluorescence spectra of diesel engine oil
    Emission spectra of different soil blank samples under 280 nm-LED irradiation. (a) Red soil; (b) yellow soil; (c) black soil
    Fig. 2. Emission spectra of different soil blank samples under 280 nm-LED irradiation. (a) Red soil; (b) yellow soil; (c) black soil
    Emission spectra of samples containing 10% engine oil under different soil types irradiated by 280 nm-LED
    Fig. 3. Emission spectra of samples containing 10% engine oil under different soil types irradiated by 280 nm-LED
    Schematic diagram and physical picture of experimental system. (a) Schematic diagram;(b) physical picture
    Fig. 4. Schematic diagram and physical picture of experimental system. (a) Schematic diagram;(b) physical picture
    Correlation between mass fraction of oil in soil and fluorescent electrical signal. (a) LIF system; (b) experimental system
    Fig. 5. Correlation between mass fraction of oil in soil and fluorescent electrical signal. (a) LIF system; (b) experimental system
    Average RSD measured by proposed system under different soil types
    Fig. 6. Average RSD measured by proposed system under different soil types
    Average RE measured by proposed system under different soil types
    Fig. 7. Average RE measured by proposed system under different soil types
    Integration time /sRSD /%
    0.46.77
    0.65.56
    0.84.72
    1.04.57
    1.44.41
    1.64.23
    2.03.61
    2.23.67
    2.43.65
    2.63.61
    3.03.52
    Table 1. RSD of signal of experimental system under different integration times
    Soil typePetroleum hydrocarbonRegression equationCorrelation coefficient R2

    Detection limit /

    (mg·kg-1

    Red soilGasoline engine oily=7121.3x+8803.120.973460.38
    Diesel engine oily=14374.4x+8791.960.994129.91
    Air compressor engine oily=49681.01x+8827.110.99538.66
    Yellow soilGasoline engine oily=6915.7x+10724.40.962562.37
    Diesel engine oily=13730.1x+11400.70.993731.39
    Air compressor engine oily=48622.8x+11641.10.99648.87
    Black soilGasoline engine oily=6001.63x+18761.290.9572104.97
    Diesel engine oily=12113.57x+18912.430.990152.01
    Air compressor engine oily=37619.13x+18317.610.992616.75
    Table 2. Quantitative analysis of soil petroleum hydrocarbons for different soil types
    Petroleum hydrocarbonStandard mass fractionPredicted mass fractionREAverage RERSDAverage RSD
    Gasoline engine oil0.1500.1434.675.623.703.53
    0.2500.2336.803.71
    0.3500.3716.003.42
    0.6000.5793.503.49
    0.8000.8577.133.33
    Diesel engine oil0.1500.1416.004.763.593.59
    0.2500.2572.803.61
    0.3500.3412.573.44
    0.6000.6132.174.17
    0.8000.88210.253.12
    Air compressor engine oil0.1500.1553.334.403.363.36
    0.2500.2614.403.28
    0.3500.3572.003.51
    0.6000.6315.173.55
    0.8000.8597.383.12
    Table 3. Prediction results of different types of petroleum hydrocarbons in red soil
    Petroleum hydrocarbonStandard mass fractionPredicted mass fractionREAverage RERSDAverage RSD
    Gasoline engine oil0.1500.13410.677.693.173.70
    0.2500.2346.404.63
    0.3500.3296.003.76
    0.6000.5705.003.01
    0.8000.88310.383.92
    Diesel engine oil0.1500.1378.676.312.423.16
    0.2500.2614.403.31
    0.3500.3325.143.86
    0.6000.5675.503.01
    0.8000.8637.883.19
    Air compressor engine oil0.1500.1434.606.403.213.04
    0.2500.2327.202.01
    0.3500.3266.863.45
    0.6000.6264.333.12
    0.8000.7289.003.43
    Table 4. Prediction results of different types of petroleum hydrocarbons in yellow soil
    Petroleum hydrocarbonStandard mass fractionPredicted mass fractionREAverage RERSDAverage RSD
    Gasoline engine oil0.1500.1596.008.253.333.40
    0.2500.2708.003.71
    0.3500.3777.713.12
    0.6000.67212.003.29
    0.8000.89111.383.61
    Diesel engine oil0.1500.1628.006.723.523.51
    0.2500.2635.203.90
    0.3500.3592.573.37
    0.6000.66310.503.21
    0.8000.8627.753.53
    Air compressor engine oil0.1500.1387.337.243.533.01
    0.2500.2687.203.52
    0.3500.3695.433.23
    0.6000.6549.003.09
    0.8000.8536.622.19
    Table 5. Prediction results of different types of petroleum hydrocarbons in black soil
    Petroleum hydrocarbonRegression equationCorrelation coefficient R2

    Detection limit /

    (mg·kg-1

    Gasoline engine oily=4718.51x+46940.90.9515135.65
    Diesel engine oily=10781.53x+47113.30.979359.37
    Air compressor engine oily=32629.52x+47467.60.990119.62
    Table 6. Quantitative analysis of soil petroleum hydrocarbons in lake bottom mud
    Petroleum hydrocarbonStandard mass fractionPredicted mass fractionREAverage RE
    Gasoline engine oil0.1500.17818.678.25
    0.2500.27510.00
    0.3500.3266.86
    0.6000.5655.83
    0.8000.8465.75
    Diesel engine oil0.1500.12814.676.72
    0.2500.2365.60
    0.3500.3237.71
    0.6000.5714.83
    0.8000.7644.50
    Air compressor engine oil0.1500.1638.697.24
    0.2500.2346.40
    0.3500.3296.00
    0.6000.5636.17
    0.8000.7738.63
    Table 7. Prediction results of different types of petroleum hydrocarbons in lake bottom mud
    Jinqiang Yang, Ruifang Yang, Nanjing Zhao, Gaofang Yin, Mingjun Ma, Li Fang, Gaoyong Shi, Liangchen Liu, Desuo Meng, Wenqing Liu. In-situ Detection of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Pollutants in Soil by Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2023, 43(6): 0612009
    Download Citation