• Journal of Inorganic Materials
  • Vol. 37, Issue 10, 1065 (2022)
Yaling CHEN1、2, Song SHU1、2, Shaoxin WANG1、2, and Jianjun LI1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 11. College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China
  • 22. National Engineering Research Center for FGD, Chengdu 610000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.15541/jim20220020 Cite this Article
    Yaling CHEN, Song SHU, Shaoxin WANG, Jianjun LI. Mn-HAP SCR Catalyst: Preparation and Sulfur Resistance[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(10): 1065 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic illustration for preparing and poisoning catalysts
    1. Schematic illustration for preparing and poisoning catalysts
    Schematic illustration of denitration activity evaluation device
    2. Schematic illustration of denitration activity evaluation device
    (a) SCR activity of CPF, CPM, CPA, and HAP, and sulfur resistance test of CPF and (b) stability test of CPF
    3. (a) SCR activity of CPF, CPM, CPA, and HAP, and sulfur resistance test of CPF and (b) stability test of CPF
    (a) XRD patterns and (b) DTG curves of catalysts
    4. (a) XRD patterns and (b) DTG curves of catalysts
    (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distributions of CPF, CPM, and CP
    5. (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distributions of CPF, CPM, and CP
    (a) Mn2p and (b) O1s XPS spectra of CPF, CPM and CPA
    6. (a) Mn2p and (b) O1s XPS spectra of CPF, CPM and CPA
    (a) H2-TPR and (b) NH3-TPD curves of CPF, CPM and CPA
    7. (a) H2-TPR and (b) NH3-TPD curves of CPF, CPM and CPA
    CatalystPreparation methodNO conversion/%Temperature and conditionRef.
    Mn-HAPCo-preparation62.60140 ℃, 200×10-6 SO2, 2 h This research
    NB-C-PHydrothermal45.00150 ℃, 250×10-6 SO2, 2 h [20]
    MnO2Oxalic acid co-precipitation17.65150 ℃, 200×10-6 SO2, 2 h [21]
    MnCrOxHydrothermal redox reaction37.46150 ℃, 50×10-6 SO2, 2 h [22]
    Table 1. Activity comparison of different catalysts
    SampleSpecific area/ (m2·g-1) Pore volume/ (cm3·g-1) Average pore size/nm
    CPF153.60.550013.49
    CPM117.30.460014.11
    CPA133.20.430011.57
    Table 2. Physical parameters of fresh catalysts and toxic catalysts
    SampleOMn
    Olatt/O Oads/O Oads/OlattMn2+/Mn Mn3+/Mn Mn4+/Mn
    CPF0.90500.09500.10500.065100.16700.7300
    CPM0.92100.07900.08600.100000.59000.3100
    CPA0.87600.12300.14100.135000.22400.6410
    Table 3. XPS results of Mn and O on the surface of fresh catalysts and toxic catalysts
    Yaling CHEN, Song SHU, Shaoxin WANG, Jianjun LI. Mn-HAP SCR Catalyst: Preparation and Sulfur Resistance[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(10): 1065
    Download Citation