• Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics
  • Vol. 41, Issue 6, 970 (2024)
SHI Shenxi1,*, WANG Zuohong1, SUN Mengran1, and ZHENG Gaige1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,Nanjing 210044, China
  • 2Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology,Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2024.06.013 Cite this Article
    Shenxi SHI, Zuohong WANG, Mengran SUN, Gaige ZHENG. Spontaneous radiation properties of graphene⁃based core⁃shell structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2024, 41(6): 970 Copy Citation Text show less
    Multilayer core-shell structure model for studying spontaneous radiation
    Fig. 1. Multilayer core-shell structure model for studying spontaneous radiation
    Real part (a) and Imaginary part (b) of dielectric function of graphene
    Fig. 2. Real part (a) and Imaginary part (b) of dielectric function of graphene
    When the radius of the core-shell structure of Au@SiO2@Graphene is {r1,r2,r3} = {30,40,50} nm: the normalized radiative and non-radiative decay rate versus rd when λ = 600 nm (a); the normalized radiative and nonradiative decay rate versus λ when rd = 70 nm (b)
    Fig. 3. When the radius of the core-shell structure of Au@SiO2@Graphene is {r1,r2,r3} = {30,40,50} nm: the normalized radiative and non-radiative decay rate versus rd when λ = 600 nm (a); the normalized radiative and nonradiative decay rate versus λ when rd = 70 nm (b)
    Normalized radiative and non-radiative decay rate versus rd for Au@SiO2@Graphene models with different radius. (a) {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm; (b) {r1,r2,r3} = {20,40,50} nm; (c) {r1,r2,r3} = {30,40,50} nm; (d) Purcell factor comparison of the structure with {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm and {r1,r2,r3} = {20,50,60} nm
    Fig. 4. Normalized radiative and non-radiative decay rate versus rd for Au@SiO2@Graphene models with different radius. (a) {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm; (b) {r1,r2,r3} = {20,40,50} nm; (c) {r1,r2,r3} = {30,40,50} nm; (d) Purcell factor comparison of the structure with {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm and {r1,r2,r3} = {20,50,60} nm
    (a) Normalized radiation and non-radiation decay rate versus wavelength for Au@SiO2@Graphene model with {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm when rd=60 nm; (b) Normalized radiation and non-radiation decay rate versus rd for Au@SiO2@Graphene model with {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm when wavelength is 633 nm
    Fig. 5. (a) Normalized radiation and non-radiation decay rate versus wavelength for Au@SiO2@Graphene model with {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm when rd=60 nm; (b) Normalized radiation and non-radiation decay rate versus rd for Au@SiO2@Graphene model with {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm when wavelength is 633 nm
    Normalized radiative and non-radiative decay rate versus wavelengthfor Au@SiO2@Graphene models with different radium. (a) {r1,r2,r3} = {20,40,50} nm; (b) {r1,r2,r3} = {30,40,50} nm
    Fig. 6. Normalized radiative and non-radiative decay rate versus wavelengthfor Au@SiO2@Graphene models with different radium. (a) {r1,r2,r3} = {20,40,50} nm; (b) {r1,r2,r3} = {30,40,50} nm
    Electric field distribution map of Au@SiO2@Graphene model at wavelength of 633 nm. (a) {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm;(b) {r1,r2,r3} = {20,40,50} nm; (c) {r1,r2,r3} = {30,40,50} nm; (d) {r1,r2,r3} = {20,50,60} nm
    Fig. 7. Electric field distribution map of Au@SiO2@Graphene model at wavelength of 633 nm. (a) {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm;(b) {r1,r2,r3} = {20,40,50} nm; (c) {r1,r2,r3} = {30,40,50} nm; (d) {r1,r2,r3} = {20,50,60} nm
    Real ϵr and imaginary ϵi part of dielectric function of GO
    Fig. 8. Real ϵr and imaginary ϵi part of dielectric function of GO
    Normalized radiation and non-radiation decay rate versus rd at wavelength of 633 nm for Au@SiO2@GO model with {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm
    Fig. 9. Normalized radiation and non-radiation decay rate versus rd at wavelength of 633 nm for Au@SiO2@GO model with {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm
    Scattering pattern of two models with {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm at wavelength of 633 nm.(a) Au@SiO2@Graphene; (b) Au@SiO2@GO
    Fig. 10. Scattering pattern of two models with {r1,r2,r3} = {10,40,50} nm at wavelength of 633 nm.(a) Au@SiO2@Graphene; (b) Au@SiO2@GO
    Shenxi SHI, Zuohong WANG, Mengran SUN, Gaige ZHENG. Spontaneous radiation properties of graphene⁃based core⁃shell structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2024, 41(6): 970
    Download Citation