Researching

Journals
  • Advanced Photonics
  • Photonics Insights
  • Advanced Photonics Nexus
  • Photonics Research
  • Advanced Imaging
  • View All Journals
  • Chinese Optics Letters
  • High Power Laser Science and Engineering
    • Articles
  • Optics
  • Physics
  • Geography
  • View All Subjects
    • Conferences
  • CIOP
  • HPLSE
  • AP
  • View All Events
    • News
    About CLP
    Search by keywords or author
    Journals >Resources Science >Volume 42 >Issue 6 >Page 1123 > Article
    • Resources Science
    • Vol. 42, Issue 6, 1123 (2020)
    Effects of age on farmers’ adoption of intertemporal green agricultural technology
    Tongchao ZHANG1、2, Tingwu YAN1、2、*, and Tongwei QIU3
    Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430074, China
  • 2Hubei Rural Development Research Center, Wuhan 430074, China
  • 3College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
    • show less
    DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.06.10 Cite this Article
    Tongchao ZHANG, Tingwu YAN, Tongwei QIU. Effects of age on farmers’ adoption of intertemporal green agricultural technology[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1123 Copy Citation Text show less
    Relationship of age, agricultural production target, and intertemporal green technology adoption
    Fig. 1. Relationship of age, agricultural production target, and intertemporal green technology adoption
    Download full size | View in the Article
    Analytical framework of age’s influence on intertemporal green technology adoption
    Fig. 2. Analytical framework of age’s influence on intertemporal green technology adoption
    Download full size | View in the Article
    Scatter plot and quadratic fitting curve of age and farmers’ straw returning behaviors
    Fig. 3. Scatter plot and quadratic fitting curve of age and farmers’ straw returning behaviors
    Download full size | View in the Article
    省份县（区、市）乡镇/街及样本村/社区样本数
    山东平度市南村镇兰底河南村、前庄村;蓼兰镇何家店村、西马丘村;崔家集镇前洼村、团结村188
    莱西市沽河镇甲瑞社区、牛溪埠社区;姜山镇大泊村、小泊村121
    安丘市金冢子镇草店子、周家店、谷家村等20
    湖北新洲区邾城街巴徐村、章程村;辛冲街干河村、罗坪河村、双桥村;潘塘街井边村、孙寨村、熊店村、易河村207
    武穴市花桥镇下彭村、刘六西村、马塘村;石佛寺镇董干畈村、湖南畈村;龙坪镇牛车村、下冯村;万丈湖农场黄湖村、太泊村204
    河北沧县高川乡泗庄村、阎辛庄村、蒲码头村、东芮屯村;刘家庙乡后生金刘村192
    新华区小赵庄乡孙庄子村、万庄子村55
    南皮县鲍官屯镇小张官村56
    安徽灵璧县朱集镇曹家庄、胡光村、刘派村、刘寨村、苗河村、王店村195
    尤集镇大章李村、解圩村、马巷村134
    合计9县（区/市）19乡镇/街55村/社区1372
    Table 1. Spatial distribution of the survey samples
    变量赋值说明
    因变量
    跨期绿色农业技术采纳Y是否进行秸秆还田：否=0;是=1
    自变量
    年龄年龄lnAge受访者实际年龄/岁,取对数
    平方项(lnAge)2受访者实际年龄/岁,取对数后的平方
    人力资本文化程度Edu不识字或识字很少=1;小学=2;初中=3;高中（中专）=4;大专及以上=5
    健康状况Hea非常差=1;比较差=2;一般=3;比较好=4;非常好=5
    人力资本Hum取文化程度与健康状况的算术平均值
    风险偏好风险厌恶Ris1关于“对于可能存在风险的事,我暂时不会尝试”：完全同意=1;比较同意=2;一般=3;不太同意=4;完全不同意=5
    风险规避Ris2您觉得是否有必要购买农业保险：有必要=0;没必要=1
    风险偏好Risk取风险厌恶与风险规避的算术平均值
    个体特征性别Gen女=0;男=1
    政治面貌Sta群众或其他=0;共产党员=1
    兼业Par无兼业=0;有兼业=1
    技术掌握Tec秸秆处置和还田方法技术掌握：很不好=1;不太好=2;一般=3;比较好=4;非常好=5
    生态价值认知Ecol秸秆还田对环保和空气污染防治：非常不利=1;不太有利=2;不好说=3;有些好处=4;非常有利=5
    经济价值认知Econ秸秆还田对您家增产增收：非常不利=1;不太有利=2;不好说=3;有些好处=4;非常有利=5
    家庭禀赋是否贫困Pov家庭年人均纯收入不低于2300元=0;否则为1
    劳动力Lab家庭劳动力数量/人
    信息化Int家中是否安装了宽带网络：否=0,是=1
    经营规模Sca家庭实际经营耕地面积/亩
    块均面积Ave家庭经营耕地的块均面积/（亩/块）
    社会资本信任Tru您对亲朋邻里：完全不信任=1;不太信任=2;一般=3;比较信任=4;完全信任=5
    互惠规范Rec您得到过亲朋邻里的帮助吗：从来没有=1;较少=2;一般=3;较多=4;经常=5
    社会参与Ass您经常和亲朋邻里聊天交流吗：从来没有=1;较少=2;一般=3;较多=4;经常=5
    社区条件环境Env您对“本村环境污染严重”：完全不同意=1;不太同意=2;一般=3;比较同意=4;完全同意=5
    供水Wat您对本村的供水情况：不满意=1;不太满意=2;一般=3;比较满意=4;非常满意=5
    供电Ele您对本村的供电情况：不满意=1;不太满意=2;一般=3;比较满意=4;非常满意=5
    制度规则补贴Sub您有无领取到秸秆利用方面的补贴：无=0;有=1
    处罚Pun当地是否有秸秆焚烧处罚措施：无=0;不清楚=1;有=2
    地区地区Reg南方水田区=1,北方旱作区=0
    Table 2. Descriptive statistics of variables
    变量全样本回归1分组回归1
    模型1.1模型1.2中青年组中老年组
    系数标准误系数标准误系数标准误系数标准误
    lnAge-0.2030.1899.482***3.2660.101*0.058-1.556***0.474
    (lnAge)2-1.265***0.426
    Gen0.0070.0980.0280.0990.0410.1650.0290.128
    Sta0.245*0.1250.244*0.1250.3460.2410.2020.150
    Par-0.0070.094-0.0490.0960.0270.161-0.0740.123
    Tec0.0270.0390.0250.0390.0760.0710.0050.048
    Ecol0.0670.0530.0740.0540.0680.0930.0620.068
    Econ0.0700.0540.0730.054-0.0690.1060.125*0.065
    Pov-0.193**0.088-0.184**0.088-0.0960.156-0.213*0.110
    Lab0.0470.0330.0450.0330.0310.0740.0490.038
    Int0.161*0.0880.1340.0880.372**0.1560.0520.110
    Sca0.008**0.0040.008**0.0040.011**0.0060.0030.005
    Ave-0.0100.012-0.0120.012-0.0220.0190.0040.017
    Tru0.0200.0520.0240.0520.0670.092-0.0050.065
    Rec0.0570.0380.0530.038-0.0290.0710.090*0.047
    Ass-0.0050.047-0.0100.0470.0570.088-0.0340.058
    Env0.163***0.0320.160***0.0320.169***0.0590.160***0.038
    Wat0.111***0.0410.120***0.0410.0270.0790.153***0.050
    Ele0.0150.0520.0120.0530.0830.091-0.0380.067
    Sub0.2990.2000.3170.2020.0390.2890.587*0.300
    Pun0.118**0.0540.139**0.0550.1450.0990.152**0.068
    Reg已控制已控制已控制已控制
    Pro>chi20.0000.0000.0000.000
    Pseudo R20.3570.3620.3970.358
    Table 3. Model regression results of the effects of age on straw returning behavior of farmers
    标准值区间低水平[0,0.2]较低水平(0.2,0.4]一般水平(0.4,0.6]较高水平(0.6,0.8]高水平(0.8,1]均值
    人力资本2.7723.5423.9843.086.630.55
    风险偏好37.6819.1716.4016.4010.350.46
    Table 4. Standard value distribution of human capital and risk preference of sample farmers (%)
    全样本回归2
    模型2.1（Edu）模型2.2（Hea）模型2.3（Hum）模型2.4（Ris1）模型2.5（Ris2）模型2.6（Risk）
    lnAge系数-1.824***-0.740***-1.599***-0.097-0.584***-0.264**
    标准误0.1410.1380.1330.1320.1640.130
    Pro>chi20.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
    Pseudo R20.1240.0480.0850.0250.1180.036
    Table 5. Impact of age on human capital and risk preferences
    变量全样本回归3
    模型3.1模型3.2模型3.3模型3.4
    系数标准误系数标准误系数标准误系数标准误
    Edu0.156***0.0520.124**0.052
    Hea-0.0330.044-0.0340.045
    Hum0.348**0.161
    Ris10.107***0.0310.105***0.031
    Ris20.383***0.0890.358***0.090
    Risk0.701***0.145
    lnAge8.657***3.3078.177**3.2817.563**3.3148.942***3.263
    (lnAge)2-1.132***0.432-1.085**0.428-0.986**0.433-1.178***0.426
    Pro>chi20.0000.0000.0000.000
    Pseudo R20.3670.3790.3830.376
    Table 6. Test of the mediating effect of human capital and risk preference
    路径中介效应Boot标准误Boot LLCIBoot ULCI
    年龄—人力资本—跨期绿色农业技术采纳-0.2220.119-0.474-0.004
    年龄—风险偏好—跨期绿色农业技术采纳-0.1130.056-0.250-0.023
    Table 7. Bootstrap test results
    Abstract
    Get PDF(in Chinese)
    Figures&Tables (10)
    Equations (3)
    References (32)
    Get Citation
    Copy Citation Text
    Tongchao ZHANG, Tingwu YAN, Tongwei QIU. Effects of age on farmers’ adoption of intertemporal green agricultural technology[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1123
    Download Citation
    Tools
    Share
    Save the article for my favorites
    Paper Information
    Recommended Topics
    Resource Economy
    Research Articles