Abstract
Ⅰ INTRODUCTION
To face the growing concerns about the shortage of fossil fuels, the importance of CO serving as C1 building block to produce compounds has attracted increasing attentions. The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is a well-known industrial-scale process to produce liquid products using syngas, a mixture of CO and H2 [1-5]. Transition metal catalysts play vital roles in the FTS process to drive the crucial steps, such as the reductive cleavage of CO and C-C coupling, to proceed under relatively milder conditions [6]. The C-C coupling step is crucial to obtain multi-carbon products [6-8], while it is difficult to control the length of carbon chain and a wide distribution of hydrocarbons is generally produced in the final outputs. A fundamental understanding on the factors that can affect the C-C coupling reaction is of great importance to guide the design of advanced catalysts and then shift a specific reaction toward a desirable product. However, the details on related elementary steps are obscure because the information on chemical bonding is difficult to obtain in real-life catalysis.
A specific chemical reaction is closely related to a limited number of atoms. In this case, atomic clusters can be the ideal active sites on heterogeneous catalysts [9-21]. The fascinating feature of gas-phase atomic clusters is that cluster reactions can be performed under isolated conditions to eliminate the effects from solvent, defects, impurity, and so on, and then the nature of bond formation and cleavage behaviors can be obtained at a strictly molecular level. The polymerization of surface CH
Ⅱ METHODS
A Experimental methods
The CuC3H
Sign up for Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics TOC Get the latest issue of Advanced Photonics delivered right to you!Sign up now
The photoelecron imaging spectroscopy (PEIS) experiments were carried out with a separate TOF-MS equipped with a laser-ablation source, a cryogenic ion trap, and a photoelectron imaging spectromter. The CuC3H
B Theoretical methods
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations using the Gaussian 09 [47] program were carried out to study the mechanisms on the reactions of CuC3H
Ⅲ RESULTS
A Experimental results
The TOF mass spectra for the interactions of laser-ablation generated and mass-selected CuC3H
Figure 1.Variation of ion intensity with respect to the pressures of CO on the reactions of CuC3H− (a), CuC3D− (b), and CuC3− (c) with CO. The data points were experimentally measured, and the solid lines were fitted to the experimental data points on the basis of least-square procedure. The fitted results demonstrated that about 31% of laser-ablation generated CuC3H− and about 37% of such generated CuC3D− were inert toward CO.
The pseudo-first-order rate constants (
B Theoretical results
The DFT calculations were carried out to investigate the structures of the CuC3H
Figure 2.(A) The DFT-calculated low-lying isomers for CuC3H
To further characterize the structure of CuC3H
Figure 3.Photoelectron spectra of CuC3H
The reactions of low-lying CuC3H
Figure 4.The DFT-calculated potential energy profiles for reactions (A) CuC3H
Ⅳ DISCUSSION
CO adsorption and dissociation on heterogeneous catalysts was generally accepted as the initial steps in the FTS process, then followed by the C-C coupling. The H-assisted pathway in CO activation has been proposed theoretically and experimentally because of the very high availability of surface hydrogen [60-64]. Recent progress demonstrated that direct coupling of CO with the terminal Mo carbide serves as the initial step in FTS [28], and the sequential addition of hydride that generates from the heterolytic cleavage of H2 promotes greatly these early steps. Herein, the fundamental study on the H-assisted C-C coupling chemistry is not only scientifically interesting but also practically important to tailor catalysts. The pathway in FIG. 4(A) shows that the H atom seems to be a spectator and does not take part directly in the C-C coupling and the Cu-release steps. While further analysis evidences that the attached H atom is vital to change the geometrical and electronic structure of the CuC3H
Natural charge analysis reveals that the H atom can also drive the charge redistribution on reaction system CuC3HCO
Figure 5.Natural charge in e distributions on I3, I5,
Ⅴ CONCLUSION
The reactions of the CuC3H
Ⅵ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.21773254) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.2016030).
Figure 1.Variation of ion intensity with respect to the pressures of CO on the reactions of CuC3H− (a), CuC3D− (b), and CuC3− (c) with CO. The data points were experimentally measured, and the solid lines were fitted to the experimental data points on the basis of least-square procedure. The fitted results demonstrated that about 31% of laser-ablation generated CuC3H− and about 37% of such generated CuC3D− were inert toward CO.
Figure 2.(A) The DFT-calculated low-lying isomers for CuC3H
Figure 3.Photoelectron spectra of CuC3H
Figure 4.The DFT-calculated potential energy profiles for reactions (A) CuC3H
Figure 5.Natural charge in e distributions on I3, I5,
Figure 6.(A) Spin crossing from the triplet state to the singlet state. The curve for the triplet state is from the intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations. The energies of the singlet states are calculated at the IRC determined triplet state structures. (B) Spin crossing from the quartet state to the doublet state. The curve for the quartet state is from the Scan calculation. The energies of the doublet states are calculated at the Scan determined quartet state structures.
References
[1] X Xu, D W Goodman. Catal. Lett, 24, 31(1994).
[2] Z Yang, S Guo, X Pan, J Wang, X Bao. Energy Environ. Sci, 4, 4500(2011).
[3] H M T Galvis, J H Bitter, C B Khare, M Ruitenbeek, A I Dugulan, K P de Jong. Science, 335, 835(2012).
[4] X Chen, D Deng, X Pan, Y Hu, X Bao. Chem. Commun, 51, 217(2015).
[5] F Jiao, J Li, X Pan, J Xiao, H Li, H Ma, M Wei, Y Pan, Z Zhou, M Li, S Miao, J Li, Y Zhu, D Xiao, T He, J Yang, F Qi, Q Fu, X Bao. Science, 351, 1065(2016).
[6] H M T Galvis, K P de Jong. ACS Catal, 3, 2130(2013).
[7] R A Friedel, R B Anderson. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 72, 1212(1950).
[8] I Puskas, R S Hurlbut. Catal. Today, 84, 99(2003).
[9] X N Li, L N Wang, L H Mou, S G He. J. Phys. Chem. A, 123, 9257(2019).
[10] J Zhang, Y Li, Z Liu, G Li, H Fan, L Jiang, H Xie. J. Phys. Chem. Lett, 10, 1566(2019).
[11] S Zhou, W Pei, Q Du, J Zhao. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 21, 10587(2019).
[12] B Yang, X L Xu, H G Xu, U Farooq, W J Zheng. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 21, 62077(2019).
[13] P Ferrari, J Vanbuel, E Janssens, P Lievens. Acc. Chem. Res, 51, 3174(2018).
[14] X Wu, L Zhao, J Jin, S Pan, W Li, X Jin, G Wang, M Zhou, G Frenking. Science, 361, 912(2018).
[15] X Cao, M Chen, J Ma, B Yin, X Xing. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 19, 196(2017).
[16] H Schwarz. Catal. Sci. Technol, 7, 4302(2017).
[17] Y X Zhao, Q Y Liu, M Q Zhang, S G He. Dalton Trans, 45, 11471(2016).
[18] Z Luo, A W Castleman Jr, S N Khanna. Chem. Rev, 116, 14456(2016).
[19] H J Zhai, Y F Zhao, W L Li, Q Chen, H Bai, H S Hu, Z A Piazza, W J Tian, H G Lu, Y B Wu, Y W Mu, G F Wei, Z P Liu, J Li, S D Li, L S Wang. Nat. Chem, 6, 727(2014).
[20] K R Asmis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 14, 9270(2012).
[21] J Li, X Li, H J Zhai, L S Wang. Science, 299, 864(2003).
[22] L Zhong, F Yu, Y An, Y Zhao, Y Sun, Z Li, T Lin, Y Lin, X Qi, Y Dai, L Gu, J Hu, S Jin, Q Shen, H Wang. Nature, 538, 84(2016).
[23] I M Ciobîcǎ, P van Helden, R A van Santen. Surf. Sci, 653, 82(2016).
[24] X Q Zhang, R A van Santen, E J M Hensen. ACS Catal, 5, 596(2015).
[25] M C Valero, P Raybaud. J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 22479(2014).
[26] C J Weststrate, A C Kızılkaya, E T R Rossen, M W G M Verhoeven, I M Ciobîcǎ, A M Saib, J W Niemantsverdriet. J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 11575(2012).
[27] I M Ciobîcǎ, R A van Santen, P J van Berge, J van de Loosdrecht. Surf. Sci, 602, 17(2008).
[28] J A Buss, G A Bailey, J Oppenheim, D G VanderVelde, W A Goddard III, T Agapie. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 141, 15664(2019).
[29] R Verhagen, A Wittlin, C W Hilbers, H van Kempen, A P M Kentgens. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 124, 1588(2002).
[30] Y Deng, Y Ge, M Xu, Q Yu, D Xiao, S Yao. Ma D., Acc. Chem. Res, 52, 3372(2019).
[31] M M Rohmer, M Bénard. Chem. Rev, 100, 495(2000).
[32] J H Meng, Q Y Liu, S G He. J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 11265(2015).
[33] H F Li, L X Jiang, Y X Zhao, Q Y Liu, T Zhang, S G He. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 57, 2662(2018).
[34] H F Li, Y X Zhao, Z Yuan, Q Y Liu, Z Y Li, X N Li, C G Ning, S G He. J. Phys. Chem. Lett, 8, 605(2017).
[35] H F Li, Z Y Li, Q Y Liu, X N Li, Y X Zhao, S G He. J. Phys. Chem. Lett, 6, 2287(2015).
[36] Z Y Li, Z Yuan, Y X Zhao, S G He. Chem. Eur. J, 20, 4163(2014).
[37] Q Y Liu, J B Ma, Z Y Li, C Zhao, C G Ning, H Chen, S G He. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 55, 5760(2016).
[38] Z Y Li, L H Mou, G P Wei, Y Ren, M Q Zhang, Q Y Liu, S G He. Inorg. Chem, 58, 4701(2019).
[39] L H Mou, Q Y Liu, T Zhang, Z Y Li, S G He. J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 3489(2018).
[40] Z Y Li, L Hu, Q Y Liu, C G Ning, H Chen, S G He, J Yao. Chem. Eur. J, 21, 17748(2015).
[41] C J Cassady, S W McElvany. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 112, 4788(1990).
[42] X N Wu, B Xu, J H Meng, S G He. Int. J. Mass Spectrom, 310, 57(2012).
[43] Z Yuan, Y X Zhao, X N Li, S G He. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 354-, 355, 105(2013).
[44] Z Yuan, Z Y Li, Z X Zhou, Q Y Liu, Y X Zhao, S G He. J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 14967(2014).
[45] G Kummerlöwe, M K Beyer. Int. J. Mass Spectrom, 244, 84(2005).
[46] Q Y Liu, L Hu, Z Y Li, C G Ning, J B Ma, H Chen, S G He. J. Chem. Phys, 142, 164301(2015).
[47] Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven, J. A. M. Jr., J. E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. Bearpark, J. J. Heyd, E. Brothers, K. N. Kudin, V. N. Staroverov, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J. C. Burant, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, M. Cossi, N. Rega, J. M. Millam, M. Klene, J. E. Knox, J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, R. L. Martin, K. Morokuma, V. G. Zakrzewski, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, O. Farkas, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, and D. J. Fox, Gaussian 09, Revision A.1, Wallingford, CT: Gaussian, Inc., (2009).
[48] Y Z Liu, L X Jiang, X N Li, L N Wang, J J Chen, S G He. J. Phys. Chem. C, 122, 19379(2018).
[49] J Tao, J P Perdew. Phys. Rev. Lett, 91, 146401(2003).
[50] H B Schlegel. J. Comput. Chem, 3, 214(1982).
[51] C Gonzalez, H B Schlegel. J. Phys. Chem, 94, 5523(1990).
[52] C Gonzalez, H B Schlegel. J. Chem. Phys, 90, 2154(1989).
[53] S H Ou, J J Chen, X N Li, T M Ma, S G He. J. Phys. Chem. C, 127, 8869(2020).
[54] X N Li, L X Jiang, L N Wang, S H Ou, M Q Zhang, Y Yang, T M Ma, S G He. J. Phys. Chem. Lett, 10, 7850(2019).
[55] Z Y Li, H F Li, Y X Zhao, S G He. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 138, 9437(2016).
[56] X N Li, Z Y Li, H F Li, S G He. Chem. Eur. J, 22, 9024(2016).
[57] Y X Zhao, X N Li, Z Yuan, Q Y Liu, Q Shi, S G He. Chem. Sci, 6, 4730(2016).
[58] R Kretschmer, M Schlangen, H Schwarz. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 52, 6097(2013).
[59] J D Watts, J Gauss, R J Bartlett. J. Chem. Phys, 98, 8718(1993).
[60] G T K K Gunasooriya, A P van Bavel, H P C E Kuipers, M Saeys. ACS Catal, 6, 3660(2016).
[61] S Liu, Y W Li, J Wang, H Jiao. Catal. Sci. Technol, 6, 8336(2016).
[62] M Zhuo, K F Tan, A Borgna, M Saeys. J. Phys. Chem. C, 113, 8357(2009).
[63] O R Inderwildi, S J Jenkins, D A King. J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 1305(2008).
[64] C F Huo, Y W Li, J Wang, J Jiao. J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 14108(2008).
[65] N K Jena, K R S Chandrakumar, S K Ghosh. J. Phys. Chem. Lett, 2, 1476(2011).
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address