• Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
  • Vol. 41, Issue 7, 2142 (2021)
Chuan-yang LIU1、*, Yi-di CHAI1、1; 2;, Xian-gen XU3、3;, Jun ZHOU3、3;, Sen-sen LU3、3;, Jian SHEN1、1; 2;, Miao HE1、1;, and Jing WU1、1; 2; *;
Author Affiliations
  • 11. Research Center of Environmental Technology in Pollution Source Identification and Precise Supervision, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 33. Changzhou Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Changzhou 213022, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2021)07-2142-06 Cite this Article
    Chuan-yang LIU, Yi-di CHAI, Xian-gen XU, Jun ZHOU, Sen-sen LU, Jian SHEN, Miao HE, Jing WU. Aqueous Fluorescence Fingerprint Characteristics and Discharge Source Identification of a River in Southern China[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(7): 2142 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of the studied river system and sampling points with aqueous fluorescence fingerprints
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the studied river system and sampling points with aqueous fluorescence fingerprints
    Aqueous fluorescence fingerprint of River A(a): Typical aqueous fluorescence fingerprint; (b): Variation of fluorescent peak intensity along River A
    Fig. 2. Aqueous fluorescence fingerprint of River A
    (a): Typical aqueous fluorescence fingerprint; (b): Variation of fluorescent peak intensity along River A
    Aqueous fluorescence fingerprint of River J (in city C)(a): Typical aqueous fluorescence fingerprint; (b): Variation of fluorescent peak intensity along River J
    Fig. 3. Aqueous fluorescence fingerprint of River J (in city C)
    (a): Typical aqueous fluorescence fingerprint; (b): Variation of fluorescent peak intensity along River J
    Typical aqueous fluorescence fingerprint of textile wastewater treatment plant M(a): Raw textile wastewater (M-raw); (b): Effluent water after treatment (M-eff)
    Fig. 4. Typical aqueous fluorescence fingerprint of textile wastewater treatment plant M
    (a): Raw textile wastewater (M-raw); (b): Effluent water after treatment (M-eff)
    A1A2A3J1J2J3M-rawM-eff
    水质荧光
    指纹比对
    算法
    A1100%>99%>99%<60%<60%<60%95%87%
    A2100%>99%<60%<60%<60%95%86%
    A3100%<60%<60%<60%94%87%
    J1100%<60%<60%--
    J2100%98%--
    J3100%--
    M-raw100%87%
    M-eff100%
    区域百分比
    相似度
    算法
    A1100%98.7%98.2%69.9%75.7%77.1%87.1%83.3%
    A2100%98.5%69.6%75.0%76.7%87.0%83.1%
    A3100%70.7%75.8%77.8%86.3%82.6%
    J1100%92.2%91.9%--
    J2100%96.3%--
    J3100%--
    M-raw100%86.3%
    M-eff100%
    Table 1. Similarities between aqueous fluorescence fingerprints
    No.CODMn/
    (mg·L-1)
    NH3-N/
    (mg·L-1)
    TP/
    (mg·L-1)
    A13.50.5420.202
    A24.20.4300.266
    A34.40.5820.246
    J12.30.1190.147
    J22.70.0910.125
    J32.31.1800.261
    Table 2. Conventional monitoring indexes of River A and J
    Chuan-yang LIU, Yi-di CHAI, Xian-gen XU, Jun ZHOU, Sen-sen LU, Jian SHEN, Miao HE, Jing WU. Aqueous Fluorescence Fingerprint Characteristics and Discharge Source Identification of a River in Southern China[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(7): 2142
    Download Citation