• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 50, Issue 11, 1112001 (2021)
Jiayi WANG1, Tao LIU1、*, Xiaofeng TANG1, Jiaqi HU1, Xing WANG2, Guoqing LI1, Tao HE1, and Shuming YANG1
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710049,China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Ultra⁃fast Photoelectric Diagnostics Technology,Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xi'an 710119,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20215011.1112001 Cite this Article
    Jiayi WANG, Tao LIU, Xiaofeng TANG, Jiaqi HU, Xing WANG, Guoqing LI, Tao HE, Shuming YANG. Fiber-coupled Chromatic Confocal 3D Measurement System and Comparative Study of Spectral Data Processing Algorithms[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(11): 1112001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of chromatic confocal measurement principle
    Fig. 1. Schematic of chromatic confocal measurement principle
    Diagram of chromatic lens group
    Fig. 2. Diagram of chromatic lens group
    Dispersion focal shift curve
    Fig. 3. Dispersion focal shift curve
    Chromatic confocal 3D measurement system
    Fig. 4. Chromatic confocal 3D measurement system
    Graphical user interface of the measurement software
    Fig. 5. Graphical user interface of the measurement software
    Optical path of chromatic confocal axial calibration experiment
    Fig. 6. Optical path of chromatic confocal axial calibration experiment
    Comparison of four peak wavelength extraction algorithms
    Fig. 7. Comparison of four peak wavelength extraction algorithms
    6-order polynomial fitting result of calibration curve
    Fig. 8. 6-order polynomial fitting result of calibration curve
    Linear measurement interval of calibration curve
    Fig. 9. Linear measurement interval of calibration curve
    Cubic spline interpolation of calibration curve
    Fig. 10. Cubic spline interpolation of calibration curve
    Spectral data and peak extraction results of different algorithms
    Fig. 11. Spectral data and peak extraction results of different algorithms
    Relative deviation of each position under different peak wavelength extraction algorithms(2 μm step)
    Fig. 12. Relative deviation of each position under different peak wavelength extraction algorithms(2 μm step)
    Axial resolution test results by fitting calibration method
    Fig. 13. Axial resolution test results by fitting calibration method
    Axial resolution test results by interpolation calibration method
    Fig. 14. Axial resolution test results by interpolation calibration method
    Measurement result of a feeler step
    Fig. 15. Measurement result of a feeler step
    3D profile measurement of flexible electrode
    Fig. 16. 3D profile measurement of flexible electrode
    3D profile measurement of MEMS sample
    Fig. 17. 3D profile measurement of MEMS sample
    Thickness compensation model[25]
    Fig. 18. Thickness compensation model25
    Relationship between angle and wavelength
    Fig. 19. Relationship between angle and wavelength
    ComponentParameter
    Light sourceWave band:400~800 nm
    Fiber couplerDiameter:50 μm multimode fiber,NA=0.22,50∶50 split ratio,Wave band:400~900 nm
    SpectrometerResolution:0.7 nm,Wave band:200~1 100 nm
    Table 1. Main component parameters
    Lens surfaceSurface typeCurvature radius/mmThickness/mmOptical glassSemiaperture/mm
    OBJStandard surface44.120-0.000
    1Even-order aspheric surface63.0000.0601.52,52.012.500
    2Standard surface66.0002.500S⁃TIH1312.500
    3Standard surface31.0009.000S⁃FSL512.500
    4Standard surface-28.50040.000-12.500
    5Even-order aspheric surface20.1309.857N-SF612.500
    6Standard surface18.979-12.500
    IMAStandard surface--0.569
    Table 2. Parameters of chromatic lens group
    Polynomial order12345678
    R⁃square0.977 80.999 5111111
    RMSE47.957.462.1071.6821.3660.8760.6730.672
    Table 3. Goodness of polynomial fitting with different orders
    Position1234567891011
    Test data /μm0100.027 8200.037 3300.171 6400.267 4499.745 4601.105 2700.098 5799.445 0900.584 51001.144 0
    True data /μm0100.25200.39300.76400.63500.21600.88700.17800.71900.711 000.22
    Deviation /μm0-0.222 2-0.352 7-0.588 5-0.362 6-0.464 60.225 2-0.071 5-1.265 0-0.125 50.005 2
    Relative deviation/%00.395 40.334 70.087 20.012 70.027 90.044 50.046 60.059 40.077 00.924 1
    Table 4. Displacement measurement results by fitting calibration method
    Position1234567891011
    Test data /μm099.608 3200.291 0300.385 4400.284 5500.140 3600.295 6700.400 0800.758 0900.666 5999.619 2
    True data /μm0100.25200.39300.76400.63500.21600.88700.17800.71900.711 000.22
    Deviation /μm0-0.641 7-0.099 0-0.374 6-0.345 6-0.069 8-0.584 50.230 00.048 0-0.043 5-0.600 8

    Relative

    deviation/%

    00.640 10.049 40.124 60.086 30.013 90.097 30.032 90.006 00.004 80.060 1
    Table 5. Displacement measurement results by interpolation calibration method
    No.12345678910Average
    h/mm0.1450.1440.1480.1440.1440.1440.1460.1480.1460.1430.145
    H/mm0.2170.2160.2220.2160.2160.2160.2190.2220.2190.2150.218
    Deviation/%0.911.371.371.371.371.3701.3701.830.5
    Table 6. Measurement result of quartz glass thickness
    Jiayi WANG, Tao LIU, Xiaofeng TANG, Jiaqi HU, Xing WANG, Guoqing LI, Tao HE, Shuming YANG. Fiber-coupled Chromatic Confocal 3D Measurement System and Comparative Study of Spectral Data Processing Algorithms[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(11): 1112001
    Download Citation