Fig. 1. Experimental setup of spatiotemporal-interference-based femtosecond laser shaping
Fig. 2. Simulation results. (a) Relative distortion fitting curve of l-q(l); (b)(c) gridded phase holograms before and after distortion correction, respectively; (d)(e) distribution of irradiance at the simulated sample when Figs. (b) and (c) are loaded on SLM
Fig. 3. Gauss Amp fitting curve for relative light intensity distribution of circular light field after the contraction
Fig. 4. Simulation results. (a)(d) Circular phase holograms before and after light-intensity correction; (b)(c) two-dimensional and one-dimensional simulated light intensity distributions when loading Fig. (a) on SLM, total power is 1.619×10-1 W; (e)(f) two-dimensional and one-dimensional simulated light intensity distributions when loading Fig. (d) on SLM, total power is 1.352×10-1 W
Fig. 5. Simulation result. (a)(d) Striped phase holograms before and after distortion and light-intensity correction; (b)(c) two-dimensional and one-dimensional simulated light intensity distributions when loading Fig. (a) on SLM, total power is 6.995×10-2 W; (e)(f) two-dimensional and one-dimensional simulated light intensity distributions when loading Fig. (d) on SLM, total power is 5.073×10-2 W; (g)(h) stainless steel surface processing images,when loading Fig. (a) or (d)
Fig. 6. Edge images of laser processing results before and after correction. (a)Before correction; (b)after correction
Fig. 7. Long stripe structure on a 500 μm thick silicon formed by stitching
Fig. 8. Simulation results. (a)(b) Two phase holograms when processing a single pixel of a QR code; (c) two-dimensional simulated light intensity distributions when loading Fig. (a) on SLM, peak irradiance is 2.077×103 W/cm2; (d) QR code structure on stainless steel surface; (e) zoom in the view of the QR code structure
Fig. 9. Observation results. (a)LIPSS image inside QR code structure; (b)legend for measuring the LIPSS cycle
Fig. 10. Schematic of observation method for the QR code structural color
Fig. 11. Images obtained from the structure on the stainless steel surface of different α varied from large to small
Item | Value | Standard deviation |
---|
I0 | 0.336 | 1.66×10-3 | w | 42.109 | 9.17×10-2 | A | 0.658 | 1.57×10-3 |
|
Table 1.
Gauss Amp fitting solution and its standard deviation for relative light intensity distribution of circular light field after the contraction