
- Photonics Research
- Vol. 9, Issue 8, 1550 (2021)
Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
In recent years, progress in monolithic photonic integration technologies has paved the way for future low-cost, energy-efficient, large-scale, and small-footprint photonic integrated circuits (PICs) [1]. High performance on-chip light sources with single-frequency behavior, especially distributed feedback (DFB) semiconductor lasers play a crucial role in versatile applications, including high-resolution LIDAR systems [2], high-speed supercomputers, and optical data centers [3]. Owing to their narrow linewidth and large modulation bandwidth [4,5], DFB lasers that are spatially and spectrally single mode are useful for wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) and can support the large growing data transmission rate in this Big Data era. In DFBs, the optical wavelength detuning (OWD), that is to say, the wavelength mismatch between the DFB lasing wavelength and the gain peak, plays a huge role in the device performance. In particular, a strong operation stability is required over a wide temperature range in silicon-based integrated technologies. Nevertheless, prior studies revealed that a positive OWD leads to a degradation of the laser physical characteristics such as the threshold current and the resonance frequency, hence limiting their use for high-speed transmission when the temperature is out of the optimum condition [6,7]. On the other hand, another major challenge is the development of isolator-free PICs. To this end, the laser sensitivity to parasitic reflections, which directly result from the various active and passive transitions and regrowth interfaces, is of paramount importance to be taken into account [8]. Prior studies on the external optical feedback (EOF) dynamics of semiconductor lasers revealed that those unwanted reflections lead to strong laser destabilization, such as mode-hopping, low-frequency fluctuations, and coherence collapse [9–11], whose presence degrades the power penalty and transmission performance of lasers [12,13]. To overcome these issues, on-chip optical isolators have been considered, however, at the price of poor isolation performance, high cost, and large footprint for a PIC [14]. To develop high-efficiency, single-frequency light sources for isolator-free applications, a quantum confined active region made with self-assembled quantum dots (QDs) is a promising solution. With the charge carrier confinement in the three spatial dimensions, the energy levels are completely discrete in those nanostructures with zero dimensionality. Prior studies demonstrated that semiconductor lasers made with these nanocrystals lead to high lasing efficiency [15,16], low relative intensity noise [17–19], remarkable temperature stability [20], and high tolerance for EOF [21–23]. More recently, it has been shown that epitaxial QD lasers directly grown on silicon are interesting for integrated technologies since they are less sensitive to the dislocations arising during the epitaxial growth of III-V groups on silicon compared to their quantum well (QW) counterparts [24]. In this context, the high thermal stability of QDs together with the large optical mismatch can be considered to realize efficient quantum light emitters customized for high-temperature operation. In this work, we report on an efficient 1.3 μm InAs QD DFB laser on GaAs that has a large OWD at room temperature. By controlling the OWD with temperature, namely, the shift of the gain peak with respect to the DFB oscillation wavelength [25], we analyze its light emission characteristics from 15°C to 55°C. In particular, we link the influence of this optical detuning to the static, dynamic, and nonlinear characteristics of the QD laser. With the design of an optimum condition at 75°C, results reported demonstrate that all the performance characteristics of the DFB laser are improved with temperature. For instance, the multimode lasing emission that takes place across the gain peak and due to temperature-dependent homogeneous linewidth broadening mechanisms associated with different QD populations [26,27] is completely eliminated; moreover, the threshold current, the linewidth enhancement factor (
The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the QD DFB laser and its static characteristics. In Section 3, the noise properties and dynamics of the device studied are analyzed. In Section 4, we perform the measurements of the linewidth enhancement factor of laser. Then, a detailed analysis of the laser dynamics in optical feedback operation is presented in Section 5. In Section 6, we conclude our results.
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE QD DEVICE
The active region of the device under study is grown from eight-layer InAs QDs on (100) GaAs substrate by using molecular beam epitaxy. The density of QDs is
Sign up for Photonics Research TOC. Get the latest issue of Photonics Research delivered right to you!Sign up now
The corrugated structure above the active region is fabricated with electron beam lithography and wet etching, and the InGaP/GaAs gratings on top are formed by metal organic vapor phase epitaxy. The cavity length
Figure 1(a) depicts the light-current (L-I) characteristics of the QD DFB laser operating under different temperatures. The device studied exhibits a strong lasing stability over a wide temperature range, by ensuring a sufficient output power over 15 mW from 15°C to 55°C. The variation of the operation temperature
Figure 1.(a) Light-current characteristics with temperature ranging from 15°C to 55°C. (b) Threshold current (burgundy) and external efficiency (jade) as a function of temperature.
Figure 2 depicts the optical spectra of the device at
Figure 2.Optical spectra of the QD DFB laser from 15°C to 55°C (
Figure 3.Temperature-dependent (a) DFB wavelength (burgundy), optical gain peak (jade), (b) optical wavelength detuning (gray), and side-mode suppression ratio (emerald).
3. RELATIVE INTENSITY NOISE AND MODULATION DYNAMIC PROPERTIES
Optical transceivers with low relative intensity noise (RIN) are required for carrying broadband data with low bit error rate [36]. The RIN properties of the DFB laser studied are therefore investigated in this section. To do so, the output light is coupled into a lens-end fiber, and then it is sent to a low-noise photodiode with a bandwidth of 10 GHz. The AC signal is amplified by a broadband amplifier with a typical small-signal gain of 30 dB, while the DC voltage is measured by a voltage meter through the DC monitor port of the photodiode. The amplified noise spectrum is measured on an electrical spectrum analyzer. More details of the experimental configurations can be found in Ref. [19]. Note that the measured intensity noise spectrum reflects the contribution of the fluctuation in carrier density but not including the shot noise, since the RIN level is usually much higher [37]. Figure 4(a) depicts the RIN spectra in different bias conditions at 20°C, and the bias current ranging from 11 to 27 mA corresponding to each spectrum is marked in the same color. Owing to the low spontaneous emission factor, RIN values as low as
Figure 4.(a) Measured RIN spectra at several bias currents at 20°C. (b) Extracted damping factor
Figure 4(b) displays the damping factor as a function of the squared ROF at 20°C (jade) and at 55°C (burgundy). The linear evolution is defined as
Modulation Dynamic Performance between InAs QD Lasers Grown on GaAs and on Si Substrate at Room Temperature
Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Substrate | GaAs | GaAs | GaAs | Si | Si |
9.3 | 9.2 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 23.0 | |
0.75 | 0.3-0.4 | 0.4 | 0.58 | 1.35 | |
2.90 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.92 | 1.70 | |
3.0 | 9.9 | 13.1 | 9.7 | 5.2 |
4. LINEWIDTH ENHANCEMENT FACTOR
The linewidth enhancement factor is known to be a gain-medium parameter to describe the carrier density dependencies of gain and carrier-induced refractive index. A material with near-zero
Figure 5.(a) Optical spectra around the DFB mode and the modulation sidebands of the DFB laser operating at
The effective
5. NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
In this section, we investigate the nonlinear dynamics of the DFB laser in presence of coherent EOF. The EOF process involved in a semiconductor laser is described as the amplitude-phase coupling in the active region between the feedback light field and that of the intra-cavity, which results in the field fluctuation both in amplitude and phase [20]. The returned field that is coupled back to the laser cavity brings both a phase fluctuation and a perturbation on the photon density, and the latter leads to a fluctuation of the carrier density and the optical gain. The gain variation therefore impacts the refractive index through the
Figure 6 schematically depicts the experimental configurations for EOF. Laser emission is coupled by an AR-coated lens-end fiber, and 90% of the coupled power is sent to the 12 m long-delay feedback path, where the light is reflected back to the laser cavity. In the experiments, such a 12 m long external cavity ensures that the ROF of the laser is well beyond the external cavity frequency, and hence the impact of the phase is negligible. The backreflector combined with a variable optical attenuator (VOA) is then wired to change the feedback strength
Figure 6.Experimental setup used for the long-delay coherent external optical feedback measurement. ISO, optical isolator; PD, photodiode; PC, polarization controller; VOA, variable optical attenuator.
Figure 7 displays the feedback dynamics both in the RF and optical domains and for two different bias conditions, when the DFB laser operates at 25°C where the OWD remains large. The first column depicts the behaviors at
Figure 7.RF spectra and optical spectra in different
More regimes on the route to CC are identified when the bias current increases to
In aforementioned sections, discussions reveal that a near-zero OWD that occurs at a high temperature is beneficial for improving laser performances, especially the decrease of the effective
Figure 8.(a), (b) RF spectra and optical spectra in different
Figure 9 depicts the
Figure 9.Critical feedback level
6. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we report an in-depth investigation on a 1.3 μm InAs/GaAs QD single-frequency laser specifically designed to increase the maximum lasing temperature. The effect of the optical mismatch between the optical gain peak and the oscillation wavelength is studied and linked to the static, dynamic, and nonlinear characteristics of the QD laser. In particular, we show that the combination of QDs as a gain medium and an optical wavelength detuning as large as 25 nm at room temperature allows us to successfully fully control the thermal effects. In this context, the increase of operation temperature is no longer a limiting factor of the device performance. With the design of an optimum temperature condition of 75°C, this DFB laser enables the best performance at a high temperature in terms of threshold current, output power,
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment. The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Institut Mines-Télécom.
References
[1] R. Jones, P. Doussiere, J. B. Driscoll, W. Lin, H. Yu, Y. Akulova, T. Komljenovic, J. E. Bowers. Heterogeneously integrated InP/silicon photonics: fabricating fully functional transceivers. IEEE Nanotechnol. Mag., 13, 17-26(2019).
[2] K. Numata, J. R. Chen, S. T. Wu, J. B. Abshire, M. A. Krainak. Frequency stabilization of distributed-feedback laser diodes at 1572 nm for lidar measurements of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Appl. Opt., 50, 1047-1056(2011).
[3] S. Matsuo, T. Fujii, K. Hasebe, K. Takeda, T. Sato, T. Kakitsuka. Directly modulated DFB laser on SiO2/Si substrate for datacenter networks. J. Lightwave Technol., 33, 1217-1222(2015).
[4] J. Duan, H. Huang, Z. Lu, P. Poole, C. Wang, F. Grillot. Narrow spectral linewidth in InAs/InP quantum dot distributed feedback lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett., 112, 121102(2018).
[5] N. Andriolli, F. Bontempi, G. Contestabile. InP monolithically integrated transmitters based on high speed directly modulated DFB lasers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 26, 1500606(2020).
[6] H. Nishimoto, M. Yamaguchi, I. Mito, K. Kobayashi. High-frequency response for DFB LD due to a wavelength detuning effect. J. Lightwave Technol., 5, 1399-1402(1987).
[7] H. Cantú, A. McKee, D. Childs, S. Watson, A. Kelly. Dynamic performance of detuned ridge waveguide AlInGaAs distributed feedback laser diodes. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., 59, 1468-1470(2017).
[8] K. Schires, N. Girard, G. Baili, G.-H. Duan, S. Gomez, F. Grillot. Dynamics of hybrid III-V silicon semiconductor lasers for integrated photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 22, 43-49(2016).
[9] R. Tkach, A. Chraplyvy. Regimes of feedback effects in 1.5-μm distributed feedback lasers. J. Lightwave Technol., 4, 1655-1661(1986).
[10] J. Mørk, J. Mark, B. Tromborg. Route to chaos and competition between relaxation oscillations for a semiconductor laser with optical feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 1999-2002(1990).
[11] K. Petermann. External optical feedback phenomena in semiconductor lasers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 1, 480-489(1995).
[12] D. Lenstra, B. Verbeek, A. Den Boef. Coherence collapse in single-mode semiconductor lasers due to optical feedback. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 21, 674-679(1985).
[13] H. Huang, J. Duan, D. Jung, A. Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Norman, J. E. Bowers, F. Grillot. Analysis of the optical feedback dynamics in InAs/GaAs quantum dot lasers directly grown on silicon. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 35, 2780-2787(2018).
[14] D. Lenstra, T. T. M. van Schaijk, K. A. Williams. Toward a feedback-insensitive semiconductor laser. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 25, 1502113(2019).
[15] F. Klopf, J. Reithmaier, A. Forchel. Highly efficient GaInAs/(Al) GaAs quantum-dot lasers based on a single active layer versus 980 nm high-power quantum-well lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett., 77, 1419-1421(2000).
[16] A. Ukhanov, A. Stintz, P. Eliseev, K. Malloy. Comparison of the carrier induced refractive index, gain, and linewidth enhancement factor in quantum dot and quantum well lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett., 84, 1058-1060(2004).
[17] A. Capua, L. Rozenfeld, V. Mikhelashvili, G. Eisenstein, M. Kuntz, M. Laemmlin, D. Bimberg. Direct correlation between a highly damped modulation response and ultra low relative intensity noise in an InAs/GaAs quantum dot laser. Opt. Express, 15, 5388-5393(2007).
[18] Z. Lu, J. Liu, C. Song, J. Weber, Y. Mao, S. Chang, H. Ding, P. Poole, P. Barrios, D. Poitras, S. Janz, M. O’Sullivan. High performance InAs/InP quantum dot 34.462-GHz C-band coherent comb laser module. Opt. Express, 26, 2160-2167(2018).
[19] J. Duan, Y. Zhou, B. Dong, H. Huang, J. C. Norman, D. Jung, Z. Zhang, C. Wang, J. E. Bowers, F. Grillot. Effect of p-doping on the intensity noise of epitaxial quantum dot lasers on silicon. Opt. Lett., 45, 4887-4890(2020).
[20] H. Huang, J. Duan, B. Dong, J. Norman, D. Jung, J. E. Bowers, F. Grillot. Epitaxial quantum dot lasers on silicon with high thermal stability and strong resistance to optical feedback. APL Photon., 5, 016103(2020).
[21] M. Matsuda, N. Yasuoka, K. Nishi, K. Takemasa, T. Yamamoto, M. Sugawara, Y. Arakawa. Low-noise characteristics on 1.3-μm-Wavelength quantum-dot DFB lasers under external optical feedback. IEEE International Semiconductor Laser Conference (ISLC), 1-2(2018).
[22] J. Duan, H. Huang, B. Dong, J. C. Norman, Z. Zhang, J. E. Bowers, F. Grillot. Dynamic and nonlinear properties of epitaxial quantum dot lasers on silicon for isolator-free integration. Photon. Res., 7, 1222-1228(2019).
[23] B. Dong, J.-D. Chen, F.-Y. Lin, J. C. Norman, J. E. Bowers, F. Grillot. Dynamic and nonlinear properties of epitaxial quantum-dot lasers on silicon operating under long-and short-cavity feedback conditions for photonic integrated circuits. Phys. Rev. A, 103, 033509(2021).
[24] A. Y. Liu, S. Srinivasan, J. Norman, A. C. Gossard, J. E. Bowers. Quantum dot lasers for silicon photonics. Photon. Res., 3, B1-B9(2015).
[25] T. Katsuyama. Development of semiconductor laser for optical communication. SEI Tech. Rev., 69, 13-20(2009).
[26] G. P. Agrawal, N. K. Dutta. Semiconductor Lasers(2013).
[27] G. Morthier, P. Vankwikelberge. Handbook of Distributed Feedback Laser Diodes(2013).
[28] K. Nishi, K. Takemasa, M. Sugawara, Y. Arakawa. Development of quantum dot lasers for data-com and silicon photonics applications. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 23, 1901007(2017).
[29] H. Soda, Y. Kotaki, H. Sudo, H. Ishikawa, S. Yamakoshi, H. Imai. Stability in single longitudinal mode operation in GaInAsP/InP phase-adjusted DFB lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 23, 804-814(1987).
[30] K. Takada, Y. Tanaka, T. Matsumoto, M. Ekawa, H. Song, Y. Nakata, M. Yamaguchi, K. Nishi, T. Yamamoto, M. Sugawara, Y. Arakawa. Wide-temperature-range 10.3 Gbit/s operations of 1.3 μm high-density quantum-dot DFB lasers. Electron. Lett., 47, 206-208(2011).
[31] S. J. Jeong, J. K. Kang, K. Oh, B. K. Kang, T.-J. Kim, Y. Sin. Effect of wavelength detuning on spectral and temperature characteristics of 1.3-μm DFB lasers. Proc. SPIE, 3001, 394-399(1997).
[32] C. Henry. Performance of distributed feedback lasers designed to favor the energy gap mode. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 21, 1913-1918(1985).
[33] K. Nishi, T. Kageyama, M. Yamaguchi, Y. Maeda, K. Takemasa, T. Yamamoto, M. Sugawara, Y. Arakawa. Molecular beam epitaxial growths of high-optical-gain InAs quantum dots on GaAs for long-wavelength emission. J. Cryst. Growth, 378, 459-462(2013).
[34] H. Lu, C. Blaauw, T. Makino. Single-mode operation over a wide temperature range in 1.3 μm InGaAsP/InP distributed feedback lasers. J. Lightwave Technol., 14, 851-859(1996).
[35] K. Takada, Y. Tanaka, T. Matsumoto, M. Ekawa, Y. Nakata, T. Yamamoto, M. Sugawara, Y. Arakawa. Temperature-stable 10.3-Gb/s operation of 1.3-μm quantum-dot DFB lasers with GaInP/GaAs gratings. National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, JWA28(2009).
[36] L. A. Coldren, S. W. Corzine, M. L. Mashanovitch. Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits, 218(2012).
[37] Y.-G. Zhou, C. Zhou, C.-F. Cao, J.-B. Du, Q. Gong, C. Wang. Relative intensity noise of InAs quantum dot lasers epitaxially grown on Ge. Opt. Express, 25, 28817-28824(2017).
[38] F. Lelarge, B. Dagens, J. Renaudier, R. Brenot, A. Accard, F. van Dijk, D. Make, O. Le Gouezigou, J.-G. Provost, F. Poingt, J. Landreau, O. Drisse, E. Derouin, B. Rousseau, F. Pommereau, G.-H. Duan. Recent advances on InAs/InP quantum dash based semiconductor lasers and optical amplifiers operating at 1.55 μm. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 13, 111-124(2007).
[39] D. Arsenijević, D. Bimberg. Quantum-dot lasers for 35 Gbit/s pulse-amplitude modulation and 160 Gbit/s differential quadrature phase-shift keying. Proc. SPIE, 9892, 98920S(2016).
[40] Y. He, Z. Zhang, Z. Lv, T. Yang, D. Lu, L. Zhao. 10-Gbps 20-km feedback-resistant transmission using directly modulated quantum-dot lasers. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 32, 1353-1356(2020).
[41] D. Inoue, D. Jung, J. Norman, Y. Wan, N. Nishiyama, S. Arai, A. C. Gossard, J. E. Bowers. Directly modulated 1.3 μm quantum dot lasers epitaxially grown on silicon. Opt. Express, 26, 7022-7033(2018).
[42] A. Fiore, A. Markus. Differential gain and gain compression in quantum-dot lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 43, 287-294(2007).
[43] C. Hantschmann, P. P. Vasil’ev, A. Wonfor, S. Chen, M. Liao, A. J. Seeds, H. Liu, R. V. Penty, I. H. White. Understanding the bandwidth limitations in monolithic 1.3 μm InAs/GaAs quantum dot lasers on silicon. J. Lightwave Technol., 37, 949-955(2018).
[44] A. Martinez, Y. Li, L. F. Lester, A. L. Gray. Microwave frequency characterization of undoped and p-doped quantum dot lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett., 90, 251101(2007).
[45] F. Grillot, B. Dagens, J.-G. Provost, H. Su, L. F. Lester. Gain compression and above-threshold linewidth enhancement factor in 1.3-μm InAs-GaAs quantum-dot lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 44, 946-951(2008).
[46] W. W. Chow, Z. Zhang, J. C. Norman, S. Liu, J. E. Bowers. On quantum-dot lasing at gain peak with linewidth enhancement factor
[47] Z. Zhang, D. Jung, J. C. Norman, W. W. Chow, J. E. Bowers. Linewidth enhancement factor in InAs/GaAs quantum dot lasers and its implication in isolator-free and narrow linewidth applications. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 25, 1900509(2019).
[48] M. Osinski, J. Buus. Linewidth broadening factor in semiconductor lasers–an overview. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 23, 9-29(1987).
[49] G. Liu, X. Jin, S.-L. Chuang. Measurement of linewidth enhancement factor of semiconductor lasers using an injection-locking technique. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 13, 430-432(2001).
[50] J.-G. Provost, F. Grillot. Measuring the chirp and the linewidth enhancement factor of optoelectronic devices with a Mach–Zehnder interferometer. IEEE Photon. J., 3, 476-488(2011).
[51] J.-G. Provost, A. Martinez, A. Shen, A. Ramdane. Single step measurement of optical transmitters Henry factor using sinusoidal optical phase modulations. Opt. Express, 19, 21396-21403(2011).
[52] R. Schimpe, J. Bowers, T. L. Koch. Characterisation of frequency response of 1.5 μm InGaAsP DFB laser diode and InGaAs PIN photodiode by heterodyne measurement technique. Electron. Lett., 22, 453-454(1986).
[53] I. Kang, C. Dorrer. Method of optical pulse characterization using sinusoidal optical phase modulations. Opt. Lett., 32, 2538-2540(2007).
[54] F. Favre. Theoretical analysis of external optical feedback on DFB semiconductor lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 23, 81-88(1987).
[55] F. Grillot. On the effects of an antireflection coating impairment on the sensitivity to optical feedback of AR/HR semiconductor DFB lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 45, 720-729(2009).
[56] B. Dong, J. Duan, C. Shang, H. Huang, A. B. Sawadogo, D. Jung, Y. Wan, J. E. Bowers, F. Grillot. Influence of the polarization anisotropy on the linewidth enhancement factor and reflection sensitivity of 1.55-μm InP-based InAs quantum dash lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett., 115, 091101(2019).
[57] J. Mørk, B. Tromborg, P. L. Christiansen. Bistability and low-frequency fluctuations in semiconductor lasers with optical feedback: a theoretical analysis. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 24, 123-133(1988).
[58] Y. Takiguchi, H. Fujino, J. Ohtsubo. Experimental synchronization of chaotic oscillations in externally injected semiconductor lasers in a low-frequency fluctuation regime. Opt. Lett., 24, 1570-1572(1999).
[59] S. Azouigui, B. Dagens, F. Lelarge, J. Provost, A. Accard, F. Grillot, A. Martinez, Q. Zou, A. Ramdane. Tolerance to optical feedback of 10-Gb/s quantum-dash-based lasers emitting at 1.51 μm. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 19, 1181-1183(2007).
[60] S. Azouigui, B. Dagens, F. Lelarge, J.-G. Provost, D. Make, O. Le Gouezigou, A. Accard, A. Martinez, K. Merghem, F. Grillot, O. Dehaese, R. Piron, S. Loualiche, Q. Zou, A. Ramdane. Optical feedback tolerance of quantum-dot-and quantum-dash-based semiconductor lasers operating at 1.55 μm. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 15, 764-773(2009).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address