• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 4, 0410024 (2021)
Weiwei Wang1, Yayu Zhai2, Ping Chen1、*, and Fengcai Cao1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Information and Communication Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan, Shanxi 0 30051, China
  • 2China Institute of Marine Technology&Economy, Beijing 100081, China;
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0410024 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Weiwei Wang, Yayu Zhai, Ping Chen, Fengcai Cao. Image Deraining Algorithm via Multiflow Expansion Residual Dense Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(4): 0410024 Copy Citation Text show less
    Overall framework of image rain removal algorithm
    Fig. 1. Overall framework of image rain removal algorithm
    Multiflow expansion residual dense network
    Fig. 2. Multiflow expansion residual dense network
    Examples of image decomposition. (a) Rainy image; (b) base layer of rainy image; (c) base layer of rainless image; (d) detail layer of rainy image
    Fig. 3. Examples of image decomposition. (a) Rainy image; (b) base layer of rainy image; (c) base layer of rainless image; (d) detail layer of rainy image
    Color curves of base layer. (a) Rainless image; (b) rainy image
    Fig. 4. Color curves of base layer. (a) Rainless image; (b) rainy image
    Example of residual image. (a) Rainless image; (b) rainy image; (c) residual image
    Fig. 5. Example of residual image. (a) Rainless image; (b) rainy image; (c) residual image
    Visual comparison of different algorithms on composite rainy images. (a1)(a2) Rainy image; (b1)(b2) GMM algorithm; (c1)(c2) DSC algorithm; (d1)(d2) DCN algorithm; (e1)(e2) DID-MDN algorithm; (f1)(f2) MERDN algorithm
    Fig. 6. Visual comparison of different algorithms on composite rainy images. (a1)(a2) Rainy image; (b1)(b2) GMM algorithm; (c1)(c2) DSC algorithm; (d1)(d2) DCN algorithm; (e1)(e2) DID-MDN algorithm; (f1)(f2) MERDN algorithm
    Visual comparison of different algorithms on real rainy images. (a1)(a2) Rainy image; (b1)(b2) GMM algorithm; (c1)(c2) DSC algorithm; (d1)(d2) DCN algorithm; (e1)(e2) DID-MDN algorithm; (f1)(f2) MERDN algorithm
    Fig. 7. Visual comparison of different algorithms on real rainy images. (a1)(a2) Rainy image; (b1)(b2) GMM algorithm; (c1)(c2) DSC algorithm; (d1)(d2) DCN algorithm; (e1)(e2) DID-MDN algorithm; (f1)(f2) MERDN algorithm
    LayerFilter sizeDilated factorNumber of filters
    Convolution×13×3132
    Convolution×13×3232
    Convolution×13×3332
    Dense block×91×1164
    Dense block×93×3232
    Convolution×13×313
    Table 1. Detailed setting of parameter layer
    AlgorithmDataset 1Dataset 2Dataset 3
    GMM23.7528.3630.70
    DSC22.0324.1630.02
    DCN21.9728.1729.42
    ID-CGAN23.8123.3920.78
    DID-MDN26.1728.2728.90
    MERDN26.4628.8131.90
    Table 2. PSNR of different algorithms unit: dB
    AlgorithmDataset 1Dataset 2Dataset 3
    GMM0.78440.87120.8928
    DSC0.79850.86790.8679
    DCN0.83330.91340.9033
    ID-CGAN0.80720.82750.8519
    DID-MDN0.84090.86250.8762
    MERDN0.88410.91730.9381
    Table 3. SSIM of different algorithms
    AlgorithmGMMDCNDID-MDNMERDN
    Time /s89729115
    Table 4. Efficiency comparison of different algorithms
    Weiwei Wang, Yayu Zhai, Ping Chen, Fengcai Cao. Image Deraining Algorithm via Multiflow Expansion Residual Dense Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(4): 0410024
    Download Citation