• Matter and Radiation at Extremes
  • Vol. 6, Issue 4, 045902 (2021)
Xuewei Denga), Xiaoxia Huang, Deen Wang, Ying Yang, Xin Zhang, and Dongxia Hu
Author Affiliations
  • Laser Fusion Research Center, China Academy of Engineering Physics, P.O. Box 919, Mianyang 621900, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1063/5.0050961 Cite this Article
    Xuewei Deng, Xiaoxia Huang, Deen Wang, Ying Yang, Xin Zhang, Dongxia Hu. Beam wavefront retrieval by convoluted spatial spectral benchmark[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2021, 6(4): 045902 Copy Citation Text show less
    Different wavefront slopes in each region focus at different positions.
    Fig. 1. Different wavefront slopes in each region focus at different positions.
    Geometry of beam propagation and wavefront retrieval scheme in terms of (a) a single beamlet and (b) the whole aperture.
    Fig. 2. Geometry of beam propagation and wavefront retrieval scheme in terms of (a) a single beamlet and (b) the whole aperture.
    Simulation setup. (a) Simulation beamline. (b) Input intensity distribution. (c) Input wavefront distribution. (d) Output intensity distribution.
    Fig. 3. Simulation setup. (a) Simulation beamline. (b) Input intensity distribution. (c) Input wavefront distribution. (d) Output intensity distribution.
    Recovery process and results of simulation. (a) Sub-aperture division from Fig. 3(d). (b) Intensity distribution of one sub-aperture and (c) the corresponding Fourier distribution. (d) Recovered wavefront of the whole aperture. (e) Retrieval error compared with the original input wavefront. (f) Errors in the Zernike polynomial coefficients compared with the original phase.
    Fig. 4. Recovery process and results of simulation. (a) Sub-aperture division from Fig. 3(d). (b) Intensity distribution of one sub-aperture and (c) the corresponding Fourier distribution. (d) Recovered wavefront of the whole aperture. (e) Retrieval error compared with the original input wavefront. (f) Errors in the Zernike polynomial coefficients compared with the original phase.
    Experimental setup.
    Fig. 5. Experimental setup.
    Experimental results. (a) Phase distribution of CPP. (b) Recorded image with illustration of sub-aperture division and overlapping layout. (c) Fourier distribution of the chosen sub-aperture. (d) Recovered wavefront of the whole aperture. (e) Retrieval error compared with the phase distribution of the CPP. (f) Errors in Zernike polynomial coefficients compared with the original phase.
    Fig. 6. Experimental results. (a) Phase distribution of CPP. (b) Recorded image with illustration of sub-aperture division and overlapping layout. (c) Fourier distribution of the chosen sub-aperture. (d) Recovered wavefront of the whole aperture. (e) Retrieval error compared with the phase distribution of the CPP. (f) Errors in Zernike polynomial coefficients compared with the original phase.
    Overlap640 × 640 pixels480 × 480 pixels
    PV (λ)RMS (%)PV (λ)RMS (%)
    Three-quarter0.09231.030.08641.15
    Half0.10371.040.09841.08
    None0.11161.110.09891.30
    Table 1. Retrieval error for different sizes of sub-aperture and different overlaps.
    Xuewei Deng, Xiaoxia Huang, Deen Wang, Ying Yang, Xin Zhang, Dongxia Hu. Beam wavefront retrieval by convoluted spatial spectral benchmark[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2021, 6(4): 045902
    Download Citation