Author Affiliations
1Tianjin Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Detection and System, School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China2Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education on High Power Solid Lighting Application System, Tianjin 300387, China3School of Control Science and Engineering Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Basic framework of algorithm
Fig. 2. Flow chart of face recognition and age estimation system
Fig. 3. Diagrams of experimental scenes. (a) Diagram of real experimental scene; (b) schematic diagram of experimental scene
Fig. 4. Face detection rate in varying illumination environment
Fig. 5. Face images with different dimming levels at distances of 1, 2 and 3 m, dimming interval is 10%. (a) Face images collected at 1 m, dimming level is 20%-100% from left to right; (b) face images collected at 2 m, dimming level is 30% ~100% from left to right; (c) face images collected at 3 m, dimming level is 40%-100% from left to right
Fig. 6. MAE of age estimation for different models at distances of 1, 2 and 3 m. (a) 1 m; (b) 2 m; (c) 3 m
Fig. 7. Face recognition rate before and after adding image enhancement algorithm in varying illumination environment
Fig. 8. MAE of human face age before and after adding image enhancement algorithm in varying illumination environment
Distance /m | Image | Indicator | Dimming level of 20% | Dimming level of 30% | Dimming level of 40% | Dimming level of 50% | Dimming level of 60% | Dimming level of 70% | Dimming level of 80% | Dimming level of 90% | Dimming level of 100% |
---|
1 | Image before adding algorithm | Gray mean value | 8.80 | 11.11 | 15.62 | 27.93 | 36.87 | 51.15 | 67.64 | 80.36 | 89.39 | Recognition rate /% | 60 | 85 | 95 | 97 | 97 | 98 | 98 | 100 | 100 | MAE | 7.50 | 7.37 | 6.20 | 2.70 | 1.41 | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.38 | Image after adding algorithm | Gray mean value | 24.99 | 30.07 | 37.41 | 56.61 | 68.77 | 84.97 | 103.28 | 115.09 | 123.38 | Recognition rate /% | 86 | 95 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 100 | 100 | 100 | MAE | 5.56 | 5.29 | 5.00 | 0.94 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 2 | Image before adding algorithm | Gray mean value | | 10.77 | 18.47 | 25.88 | 35.69 | 44.76 | 54.50 | 66.05 | 75.38 | Recognition rate /% | | 28 | 79 | 87 | 98 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 100 | MAE | | 7.91 | 7.19 | 2.27 | 1.97 | 1.94 | 1.65 | 1.47 | 1.36 | Image after adding algorithm | Gray mean value | | 29.94 | 43.17 | 53.77 | 67.37 | 78.65 | 89.97 | 101.84 | 110.70 | Recognition rate /% | | 75 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 99 | 99 | 100 | 100 | MAE | | 6.35 | 4.20 | 1.67 | 1.37 | 1.08 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 3 | Image before adding algorithm | Gray mean value | | | 11.53 | 17.23 | 25.32 | 34.29 | 43.32 | 50.18 | 59.95 | Recognition rate /% | | | 24 | 63 | 84 | 84 | 97 | 100 | 100 | MAE | | | 7.45 | 7.02 | 3.89 | 2.46 | 2.29 | 2.23 | 2.07 | Image after adding algorithm | Image gray mean | | | 32.04 | 42.03 | 55.06 | 67.18 | 78.25 | 85.90 | 96.98 | Recognition rate /% | | | 49 | 85 | 95 | 97 | 98 | 100 | 100 | MAE | | | 5.45 | 4.86 | 2.09 | 1.35 | 1.33 | 0.99 | 0.76 |
|
Table 1. Comparison results of gray mean value, recognition rate and MAE before and after adding image enhancement algorithm at distances of 1, 2 and 3 m