• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 12, 1214002 (2020)
Jinpeng Zhang1、2, Xunpeng Qin1、2、*, Jiuxin Yuan1、2, Xiaokai Wang1、2, and Yan Zeng1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology of Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • 2School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.1214002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jinpeng Zhang, Xunpeng Qin, Jiuxin Yuan, Xiaokai Wang, Yan Zeng. Defect Location and Size Detection Based on Laser Ultrasonic Diffraction Bulk Wave[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(12): 1214002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of defect location detection. (a) Starting point; (b) middle point; (c) terminal point
    Fig. 1. Schematic of defect location detection. (a) Starting point; (b) middle point; (c) terminal point
    Schematic of defect size detection. (a) Detection of defect with diameter Φ1; (b) detection of defect with diameter Φ2
    Fig. 2. Schematic of defect size detection. (a) Detection of defect with diameter Φ1; (b) detection of defect with diameter Φ2
    Schematic of Comsol finite element simulation model
    Fig. 3. Schematic of Comsol finite element simulation model
    Interaction process between laser ultrasonic and internal defect. (a) t=2.05 μs; (b) t=2.50 μs; (c) t=3.60 μs; (d) t=4.15 μs; (e) t=4.50 μs; (f) t=5.00 μs
    Fig. 4. Interaction process between laser ultrasonic and internal defect. (a) t=2.05 μs; (b) t=2.50 μs; (c) t=3.60 μs; (d) t=4.15 μs; (e) t=4.50 μs; (f) t=5.00 μs
    Schematic of each-mode ultrasonic wave propagation
    Fig. 5. Schematic of each-mode ultrasonic wave propagation
    Scanning schematic and calculation results when pump laser fixed and probe laser movable. (a) Schematic of scanning form; (b) calculation results of received signals
    Fig. 6. Scanning schematic and calculation results when pump laser fixed and probe laser movable. (a) Schematic of scanning form; (b) calculation results of received signals
    Finite element simulation results when pump laser fixed and probe laser movable. (a) B-scan result with defects; (b) B-scan result without defects; (c) difference between B-scan results with and without defects
    Fig. 7. Finite element simulation results when pump laser fixed and probe laser movable. (a) B-scan result with defects; (b) B-scan result without defects; (c) difference between B-scan results with and without defects
    Scanning schematic and calculation results of received signals when pump laser and probe laser simultaneously movable. (a) Schematic of scanning form; (b) block 1; (c) block 2; (d) block 3
    Fig. 8. Scanning schematic and calculation results of received signals when pump laser and probe laser simultaneously movable. (a) Schematic of scanning form; (b) block 1; (c) block 2; (d) block 3
    Laser ultrasonic detection system. (a) Schematic of system; (b) experimental image of system
    Fig. 9. Laser ultrasonic detection system. (a) Schematic of system; (b) experimental image of system
    Experiment on shear wave velocity measurement. (a) Experimental diagram; (b) experimental result
    Fig. 10. Experiment on shear wave velocity measurement. (a) Experimental diagram; (b) experimental result
    Diagram of 45 steel block to be detected. (a) Three-dimensional diagram; (b) physical diagram
    Fig. 11. Diagram of 45 steel block to be detected. (a) Three-dimensional diagram; (b) physical diagram
    Scanning schematic of defects detected by laser ultrasonic diffraction bulk wave method
    Fig. 12. Scanning schematic of defects detected by laser ultrasonic diffraction bulk wave method
    Experimental results of B-scan for each defect. (a) defect 1; (b) defect 2; (c) defect 3
    Fig. 13. Experimental results of B-scan for each defect. (a) defect 1; (b) defect 2; (c) defect 3
    Schematic of calculation of defect location and size
    Fig. 14. Schematic of calculation of defect location and size
    Relative errors from defect diffraction bulk wave detection method
    Fig. 15. Relative errors from defect diffraction bulk wave detection method
    WaveL waveS waveR wave
    Speed /(m·s-1)590032002900
    Table 1. Sound speed of each-mode ultrasonic wave in 45 steel
    Block No.123
    h /mm10510
    Φ /mm112
    Table 2. Parameters of internal defects in 45 steel block
    Defect No.123
    d /mm9.8010.2010.10
    tSS /μs6.323.826.00
    tSCS /μs7.264.667.80
    Table 3. Arrival time of SS wave and SCS wave at different scanning distances
    Defect No.123
    l /mm12.3012.7012.60
    h /mm10.376.1510.41
    Φ /mm1.281.242.43
    Table 4. Experimental results from defect diffraction bulk wave detection method
    Jinpeng Zhang, Xunpeng Qin, Jiuxin Yuan, Xiaokai Wang, Yan Zeng. Defect Location and Size Detection Based on Laser Ultrasonic Diffraction Bulk Wave[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(12): 1214002
    Download Citation