• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 14, 141031 (2020)
Gang Li*, Qiangwei Liu, Jian Wan, Biao Ma, and Ying Li
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electronic and Control Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710064, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.141031 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Gang Li, Qiangwei Liu, Jian Wan, Biao Ma, Ying Li. A Novel Pavement Crack Detection Algorithm Using Interlaced Low-Rank Group Convolution Hybrid Deep Network Under a Complex Background[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(14): 141031 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flowchart of concrete pavement crack detection
    Fig. 1. Flowchart of concrete pavement crack detection
    Concrete pavement crack image dataset. (a) No-crack images; (b) crack images
    Fig. 2. Concrete pavement crack image dataset. (a) No-crack images; (b) crack images
    Crack images that may be disregarded in detection
    Fig. 3. Crack images that may be disregarded in detection
    Cutting process diagram for crack images using overlapping sliding window technology
    Fig. 4. Cutting process diagram for crack images using overlapping sliding window technology
    ILGCHDN classification model structure diagram
    Fig. 5. ILGCHDN classification model structure diagram
    Convolution block of the ILGCHDN model
    Fig. 6. Convolution block of the ILGCHDN model
    Comparison of the renderings by two algorithms after binarization of 6 crack images. (a) Original crack images; (b) label marking images; (c) renderings of the global threshold method; (d) renderings of the adaptive threshold method
    Fig. 7. Comparison of the renderings by two algorithms after binarization of 6 crack images. (a) Original crack images; (b) label marking images; (c) renderings of the global threshold method; (d) renderings of the adaptive threshold method
    Schematic diagram of calculating crack width in image coordinate system
    Fig. 8. Schematic diagram of calculating crack width in image coordinate system
    Accuracy diagram of the training model
    Fig. 9. Accuracy diagram of the training model
    Loss diagram of the training model
    Fig. 10. Loss diagram of the training model
    Error comparison histogram for crack width measurement
    Fig. 11. Error comparison histogram for crack width measurement
    AlgorithmEvaluation index
    PrecisionRecallF1-scoreModel parameter /MBFrames per second
    Crack Forest[7]0.83150.84580.83853.7
    Gabor filter[6]0.78190.70210.73982.1
    SVM[4]0.81120.67320.73582.7
    CNN[13]NB-CNN[14]0.86970.92100.92490.93210.89650.92653563656.07.2
    MI-CNN[15]0.94200.92310.93243809.1
    ILGCHDN0.97260.98020.976467.814.0
    Table 1. Performance comparison table of various crack detection algorithms
    DatasetsEvaluation index
    PrecisionRecallF1-scoreFrames per second
    Crack5000.96150.94580.953613.6
    CFD0.98190.97210.976913.0
    Cracktree2000.97120.96710.969112.5
    Table 2. Test results of the models on three public datasets
    Gang Li, Qiangwei Liu, Jian Wan, Biao Ma, Ying Li. A Novel Pavement Crack Detection Algorithm Using Interlaced Low-Rank Group Convolution Hybrid Deep Network Under a Complex Background[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(14): 141031
    Download Citation