

- High Power Laser Science and Engineering
- Vol. 7, Issue 3, 03000e50 (2019)
Abstract
Keywords
1 Introduction
Relativistically intense laser–plasma interactions are capable of generating energetic sources of radiation and particles. X-ray, gamma ray, electron, positron, proton, heavy ion, and neutron sources stemming from these interactions have all been created and characterized[
Facilities capable of reaching relativistic intensities have been available at laboratories around the world for decades. Using these systems, numerous radiation generation and particle acceleration mechanisms have been discovered and studied, including attosecond pulse production[
Of particular interest to the application of these sources is use in proton cancer therapy[
Sign up for High Power Laser Science and Engineering TOC. Get the latest issue of High Power Laser Science and Engineering delivered right to you!Sign up now
To address these deficiencies and satisfy the requirements of numerous applications, advances in laser technology are being implemented to construct new facilities which operate with high average power and at high repetition rates[
Target systems designed for low-repetition-rate operation typically rely on solid metal foils which are individually rastered or rotated into place and aligned to an accuracy within a few microns before irradiation. At a 1 to 10 Hz repetition rate this process is feasible, but scaling to even higher repetition rates quickly becomes untenable. The total number of targets per carrier is typically limited to a few hundred or a thousand at most, requiring downtime to reload.
Before alignment, each target must be precisely fabricated and characterized. Use at high repetition rates requires tens to hundreds of thousands of targets for sustained operation throughout the course of just one day. Current fabrication and metrology approaches are not suited to meet the over thousand-fold increase in demand for these targets.
Another important topic to consider, as repetition rates increase, is technology to improve the properties of the ultra-intense laser pulse before it arrives at the target. Plasma mirrors, a commonly employed optical element, aim to improve the temporal pulse contrast of the laser and prevent the deleterious generation of preplasma[
High-repetition-rate operation presents new operational challenges not present with low-repetition-rate systems. As laser intensities and peak powers increase, combined with high-repetition-rate operation, the potential for debris accumulation and damage to sensitive optics increases. Exceedingly expensive final focusing optics may need to become consumable, or protected by consumable pellicles, when operating in these environments. Lower-cost, lower-quality disposable focusing optics or plasma optics have been proposed as substitutes[
For all of these reasons there is now a consensus that much more work needs to be done to address these concerns[
Here we present a novel target generation scheme based on high-velocity, laminar-flowing, liquid microjets which support estimated repetition rates up to 40 kHz. The targets include a
The paper is organized as follows. We begin by discussing the physics involved in the formation of liquid jets – including laminar flow conditions, limitations to the free laminar flow propagation, subsequent breakup effects – and provide characteristic lengths and timescales for the jets formed in this work. The assembly used to generate these liquid microjets is then detailed in Section
2 Physics of liquid jets
The liquid targets and optics described in this work are based on the physics of liquid jets which were first studied in detail by Lord Rayleigh over 100 years ago[
The fundamental component of the target system is a high-velocity, laminar-flowing, liquid microjet. Formation of a continuous, laminar-flowing liquid jet requires that the Reynolds number,
Even within this laminar limit, jets are inherently unstable due to the Plateau–Rayleigh instability[
In some cases, droplet formation in a repeatable manner is desired. One can provide a droplet for every laser pulse by seeding the Plateau–Rayleigh instability through vibrations or pressure fluctuations to initiate droplet formation with high repeatability. When operated in this mode, droplets are formed at repeatable intervals with well-controlled volume and velocity distributions. Additionally, the flow-dependent droplet formation frequency allows for the creation of a droplet train at repetition rates greater than 100 kHz.
Following from the Plateau–Rayleigh instability, the growth rate of a perturbation to a flowing-liquid jet is maximal at the point where
To give a scale of these values for the parameters used in this work we operate with a nominally
3 Liquid microjet assembly
Fundamental to the formation of liquid microjets in this work is our effort to adhere to ease of setup and maintenance. Therefore, many of the components in the microjet assembly are commercial off-the-shelf items which are supplied in large quantity for relatively low cost. The following section details the components of the microjet assembly and construction techniques.
The fundamental components of the liquid microjet nozzle assembly are shown in Figure
The Swagelok components are standard off-the-shelf items which require no modification for installation in this system. Vespel ferrules are specified to accommodate the outer diameter of the glass capillary, used as the nozzle tip, at
For this work we employ a glass capillary with
The high-velocity, laminar-flowing, liquid microjet from the nozzle assembly is driven by a high-pressure syringe pump, Teledyne ISCO Model 100 DX, which provides a continuous flow at up to 10,000 psi. The stable pressure control and vibration-free output of the syringe pump makes it particularly well-suited for the formation of laminar, liquid microjets. Changes in the fluid pressure supplied to the nozzle lead to variations in the laminar flow conditions essential for consistent jet formation. Further, pressure waves within the fluid lines can directly couple to vibrations at the nozzle tip which reduce alignment precision and can seed instabilities in the fluid flow, causing disintegration of the jet before the expected breakup distance.
The liquid supply for the syringe pump is maintained at atmospheric pressure and fed into the 100 mL syringe pump reservoir through a
We note here that the operation time of the above-described configuration with a single syringe pump is limited by the 100 mL reservoir size. Thus the liquid target can operate continuously for 50 min before stopping to refill, which takes roughly 10 min. However, continuous operation with two syringe pumps is a commercially offered feature.
In the case that the fluid flow is stopped and restarted, the targets have been found to repeatedly return to their previous state. Even when irradiated at a 1 kHz repetition rate, the targets are stable after multiple refill cycles through the course of a day. Further, day after day the targets are routinely reformed with consistent and precise positional and dimensional stability, and the nozzles have been found to last for over one month before requiring replacement due to clogging or damage.
4 Liquid targets
The demands for target requirements for laser–plasma interaction (LPI) studies and applications have been discussed and detailed throughout the literature[
Previous efforts to operate with solid density targets at high repetition rates include ribbon spools[
Liquid targets display substantial benefits to high-repetition-rate operation; the target material can be recycled, they generate little to no debris, but typically require nonnegligible operating pressures (for example, Ref. [
Liquid sprays or mists have been employed in LPI studies[
The remainder of this section will present our results for creating various liquid targets using either water or ethylene glycol and operating at 1 kHz. For the purpose of characterization, the presented targets were imaged by probe beam illumination. The laser source used is a Coherent Legend which is frequency doubled to 420 nm and has a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) pulse duration of 80 fs. The imaging objective is a Mitutoyo Plan APO Infinity Corrected Long Working Distance 10
A set of 1000 images was recorded for each target type. Image analysis was conducted to determine the size, major and minor axis dimensions, and probability of target presence which accounts for both positional and dimensional fluctuations from target to target.
Water, at atmospheric pressure, was used for the target generation and characterization in all cases but that of the liquid sheet target. For this case, we employ ethylene glycol, in a vacuum environment. The liquid microjet system is compatible with a range of fluids, which all function in a similar manner, according to the individual fluid properties. To address the difference between the operation of liquid microjets in air versus in vacuum, other current works have found that the resulting microjet properties do not appreciably differ between the two cases[
4.1 Liquid jet targets
The most fundamental and simplistic target to generate with the presented system is that of a liquid jet. Figure
The flow rate from the syringe pump was set to
As previously mentioned, characterization of the jet was performed with short-pulse, microscope shadowgraphy images. Image analysis was conducted to quantify the size and stability of the jet. We find that the diameter of the liquid jet is
The positional stability of the jet was assessed by means of the same image analysis routine. From the 1000 images collected, we identify the region of the image where the target is located. We then calculate, on a per-pixel basis, the probability that the target will appear within that pixel over the 1000 recorded instances. We refer to this metric as the probability of target presence – best illustrated by Figure
While this metric does not necessarily quantitatively describe the size, shape, and position of the targets, due to the convolution between these three variables, it does provide an instructive and qualitative indication of the target stability. Note that black indicates that for all 1000 occurrences a portion of the target was located in that position, while white shows where the target does not appear.
The resulting probability of target presence image for the jet target is shown in Figure
With regards to the applicability of the jet target, while not ideal for electron and ion acceleration due to the circular cross-section, this particular target has found use due to the simplicity and straightforward implementation. Initial studies of intense laser–liquid interactions, by Thoss
More recent work using the nozzle assembly described in this work has been performed. Backward-moving electron acceleration far exceeding ponderomotive scalings at a 1 kHz repetition rate with relativistic intensities was demonstrated[
4.2 Liquid droplet targets
Reduced-mass targets have been explored for their uses in the study of LPI and warm dense matter due to enhanced electron refluxing and heating, resulting from the limitation of return currents which occur in bulk targets[
Liquid droplets are a promising alternative to the solid-based reduced-mass targets that are conventionally used. Prior work has been conducted on ion acceleration and subsequent neutron generation from heavy water droplets[
As previously addressed, the inherent instability of the liquid jet causes a breakup into droplets after a given distance. This disintegration of the liquid jet is driven by minimization of the surface energy of the fluid and initiated primarily by vibrations and sheer stresses within the liquid jet. Here we intentionally seeded the instability of the jet, via the Plateau–Rayleigh instability, to create droplet formation with high repeatability. This causes the formation of droplets at frequencies greater than 100 kHz with high-precision volume and velocity distributions.
Seeding of the Plateau–Rayleigh instability requires a vibrational or pressure perturbation to be applied to the liquid jet. For this work we seed a vibrational instability with a Thorlabs AE0203D08F piezoelectric actuator which is affixed to the nozzle nut with epoxy as shown in Figure
In high-repetition-rate use, synchronization between the fixed laser pulse frequency of 1 kHz is required in order to have positional stability of the droplet with respect to the laser focus. We employ a 1 kHz trigger signal synchronized to the laser source to time the actuator driver with variable drive frequency, pulse number, pulse duration, delay, and amplitude. While the trigger signal arrives every 1 ms, the actuator driving signal is run in a burst mode with a frequency near that of the spontaneous droplet formation frequency (
In the process of droplet breakoff, large primary and small satellite droplets are formed in an alternating droplet train which is depicted in Figure
The shape of the primary droplets is slightly ellipsoidal. The major axis length is
While the dimensional measurements are precisely controlled, the positional stability of the primary droplet target is relatively less well constrained, as illustrated by the probability of target presence map shown in Figure
The smaller satellite droplet is also slightly ellipsoidal in shape, with a major axis length of
The dimensional and positional stability of the droplet targets is critical for use, especially in the case of reduced-mass targets. The droplet targets demonstrated here are well-suited for use with fast-focusing optics, as the positional stability is better than the length of the confocal parameter even for an
A number of other approaches to generating droplets have been performed. These methods include pressure-based initiation of the Plateau–Rayleigh instability as opposed to vibrational[
4.3 Liquid sheet targets
Planar, solid density, foils of the order of a few microns in thickness are the most commonly employed target configuration for the study of high-intensity LPI. These foils have proved useful for the study of a wide range of processes, including energetic electron and ion acceleration[
Literature on the formation of liquid sheets abounds, stemming from a range of fields[
More recently, contemporary efforts to create a flowing, planar, liquid sheet target have resulted in the development of two approaches. First, the method upon which this work is based, is the intersection of two, laminar-flowing liquid microjets. Previous work by Ekimova
The second method is through the use of microengineered nozzles. Galinis
The nozzle arrangement for this work and the resulting target geometry are illustrated in Figure
To form the sheet, two
It is important to note that the angle of the sheet relative to the plane of incidence between the two microjets is dependent on
Following the dual microjet geometry described above, and with the use of ethylene glycol at a
The sheet thickness at the top is a few microns thick. Further down, the sheet thins to a minimum of 450 nm, as denoted by the white cross in Figure
For the above-described configuration, with the use of ethylene glycol, 450 nm was the minimum achievable thickness. It should be noted, however, that we have created sheets with water as thin as 275 nm using the same jet configuration. Unfortunately, these sheets are unstable and the rims do not close at the bottom. Efforts to further reduce the sheet thickness are ongoing.
The structure of the sheet is supported by the two thick,
Subsequent secondary and higher-order leaf-like structures are formed below the primary sheet. These sheets, however, are relatively thick in comparison to the first sheet, and smaller in length and width. The sheet ultimately disintegrates into a droplet spray after the onset of the Plateau–Rayleigh instability.
Other notable variables of the submicron-thick sheet target include the control of fluid velocity. As the fluid velocity increases, so does the length and width of the sheet. There are, however, practical limitations to the overall size of the sheet as determined by the psi rating of the syringe pump, Reynolds number limit for laminar flow, and the resulting spontaneous breakup length, which is dependent on the flow velocity. Additionally, all of these values ultimately depend on the fluid used.
The sheet target is not depicted in terms of the probability of target presence, as it is not well characterized in terms of dimensional and positional stability by this illustration. The critical stability values for the sheet target are instead the target angle, optical axis positioning, and sheet thickness. The target angle stability was measured by means of image analysis from frames collected in the testing of the plasma mirror (see Section
The above-described submicron-thick, planar liquid sheet target has already been demonstrated for use in high-intensity, high-repetition-rate LPI experiments. Morrison
4.4 Exotic liquid targets
Aside from the relatively simple cylindrical, spherical, and planar geometries formed by the jet, droplets and sheet targets, more exotic and complex geometries are possible. During our efforts we explored a few exotic configurations which may be of interest to the LPI community. These represent only a small subset of possible liquid targets. The results we highlight here are meant to be illustrative, not exhaustive. In this section we present isolated disks, cylindrically curved sheets, and narrow wires a few microns in diameter, as shown in Figure
These targets have a range of potential use cases for both fundamental studies and applications. In particular, the isolated disks function as reduced-mass targets. As previously addressed, reduced-mass, planar targets are of high interest to the high-intensity laser–plasma community for their known role in the enhancement of ion acceleration due to the promotion of enhanced electron refluxing and sheath fields[
4.4.1 Isolated disk targets
An alternative approach to producing thin planar targets, from the method detailed for the submicron-thick sheet targets, is through the collision of two droplets[
Tuning of the angle normal to the disk surface is performed through off-normal collisions of the two droplets in the horizontal and vertical planes. The off-normal intersection serves to rotate and oblate the disk, though global rotation of the two nozzles can maintain the sheet symmetry while also achieving a rotation. Another tuning parameter which can be used to modify the interaction is the evolution time of the droplet collision. This changes the aspect ratio, shape, and general morphology of the droplet collision, and could be exploited to create other unique target types.
Additionally, relative fluid velocity, angle of incidence, and fluid properties such as surface tension and viscosity modify the droplet interaction and the resulting disk size, inner sheet thickness, and subsequent droplet temporal evolution. These parameters have not been surveyed in this work, but are proposed for future studies with relevance to high-intensity LPI targetry.
Droplet-on-demand generators where the droplets are expelled from the capillary orifice only when requested, instead of the continuous droplet generation approach used here, may be applied for droplet–droplet collisions on lower-repetition-rate laser systems or those which have concerns about vacuum pumping rate or excess background gas pressure[
4.4.2 Cylindrically curved sheet targets
One method of generating a high-repetition-rate liquid target with a curved surface is through a droplet–jet collision. As shown in Figure
Further modification and tailoring of the curved surface target can be performed by varying the relative size of the jet and droplet, angle of incidence, fluid properties, etc. These variations should enable variation in the radius of curvature, thickness, and other relevant parameters of the resulting curved surface.
4.4.3 Narrow wire targets
Here, the piezoelectric actuators are operated continuously near the spontaneous droplet frequency to establish the Plateau–Rayleigh instability. Before droplet breakoff, a modulation in the diameter of the jet is formed resulting from the resonant instability. When two peaks from this modulation are overlapped between the two jets, the collision forms a triangular, ladder-like structure. The horizontally oriented rungs shown in Figure
Proposed uses for these exotic target types are not directly clear, but unique and novel geometries are commonly used in LPI studies to measure, enhance, or modify various parameters[
5 Liquid optics
Liquid-based optical elements are commonly used in a wide range of optical applications. Dye jet lasers, liquid lenses, and an array of various liquid crystal-based optics, including phase and amplitude modulators, prisms and lenses are now ubiquitous. In many applications, use of fluids instead of more conventional solid-state optics offers performance benefits such as variable focal lengths, electrically addressable control, or consumable modes of operation.
Liquid optics for high-repetition rate, high-intensity LPI also show promise to offer advantages over conventional optics, primarily in cases where the optical element is consumable. Liquids offer the capability for rapid refreshment and low cost per shot, such that use at high repetition rates is viable. By generating the optic on an individual shot-to-shot basis, this avoids the usual concerns that the optics will be damaged by the fluence of the laser pulse. This quality is particularly advantageous when employed in extreme environments, such as those in the vicinity of the LPI.
5.1 Liquid plasma mirror
With the push to develop high-intensity lasers which operate at kHz repetition rates or higher, associated optical devices must also meet these demands. One such class of optical devices aims to improve the temporal pulse contrast of the laser pulse by suppressing or removing prepulses and pedestal features that prematurely damage the target and generate preplasma which can be detrimental to experimental objectives such as high-energy ion acceleration. Many solid-state temporal pulse cleaning devices such as Pockels cells, saturable absorbers, crossed polarized wave generation (XPW), and optical parametric amplifiers (OPAs) have been demonstrated at high repetition rates as well. One commonly employed temporal pulse cleaning technique, plasma mirrors, however, are not ideally suited for high-repetition-rate use due to the consumable nature of the mirror media.
Typically composed of an anti-reflection coating on an optical quality substrate, a plasma mirror maintains low reflectivity until the leading edge of the pulse generates a highly reflective plasma on the surface. This technique nominally results in a contrast enhancement by a factor of 100 at the expense of approximately 25% of the energy. Since the irradiated region of the optic is destroyed on each shot, the substrate is rastered, realigned, and ultimately discarded after a series of exposures.
Previous demonstrations of liquid-based plasma mirrors have been performed with the use of ethylene glycol flowing from a dye laser jet[
As described in the remainder of this section, we expand on these techniques to demonstrate the use of a less than
5.2 Anti-reflection properties of thin liquid sheet
Enhancing contrast with the use of a plasma mirror requires that the optical surface in the low field should exhibit low reflectivity. While solid-state plasma mirrors rely on dielectric coatings to achieve this effect, an alternative solution is to leverage an etalon-like effect of destructive interference in a thin film. The etalon reflectivity,
Note that the etalon reflectivity is a function of incidence angle and wavelength. By focusing onto the thin film, a range of angles are introduced. To mitigate this effect, we operate near focus, within the Rayleigh range, where the wavefronts are nominally flat. Therefore, we do not consider the angle-dependent reflectivity, and instead focus on the unavoidable wavelength dependence required to support an ultrashort pulse.
A MATLAB script was written to calculate the thickness-dependent etalon reflectivity over the range of wavelengths contained within the pulse spectrum. This reflectivity was then weighted to the energy contained within each wavelength, and is referred to as the bandwidth-dependent calculation. To match the experimental laser pulse, a spectrum with a Gaussian distribution centered at 790 nm and FWHM
The linear scale plot in Figure
The bandwidth-dependent etalon reflectivity of the thin film puts a lower limit on the reflectivity at each minima. At higher-order minima, the minimum reflectivity increases. Therefore, operation at the lowest minima possible is desired, which in our case is at 605 nm.
A number of different pulse durations can be used to access the physics of high-intensity laser–plasma interactions. These pulse durations span from few-cycle pulses up to greater than picosecond durations. To consider the minimum reflectivity from an etalon-like destructively interfering sheet for these pulse durations, we examine the Fourier-transform-limited bandwidth for pulses centered at 790 nm with pulse durations of 1 ps, 300 fs, 100 fs, 30 fs and 7 fs. The results of these calculations are summarized in Table
FWHM pulse | FWHM | Minimum |
---|---|---|
duration (fs) | bandwidth (nm) | reflectivity |
7 | 134.5 | 1.06 |
30 | 31.38 | 6.14 |
100 | 9.41 | 5.54 |
300 | 3.14 | 6.18 |
1000 | 0.94 | 5.62 |
Table 1. Pulse durations, Fourier-transform-limited bandwidth, and calculated minimum reflectivity for reflection from an etalon-like thin film at the first destructive minima.
Fitting the results of Table
It should be noted that the effect of spectral phase was ignored for the calculation of the etalon-like reflectivity because we consider only a single pulse case. For configurations where double or multiple pulses are incident onto the sheet in the low field, spectral interference between the two pulses can impact the ultimate reflectivity and pulse contrast enhancement.
5.3 Experimental setup and results
The thin, liquid sheet was experimentally tested for its anti-reflection properties and its use as a plasma mirror. A few hundred thousand shots were taken with s-polarized light at low intensity (
In addition to temporal pulse contrast enhancement, plasma mirrors can exhibit spatial mode cleaning properties. When operated near the focus, as in this case, the higher-order spatial modes are effectively filtered out of the reflected beam because the intensity-dependent reflectivity is less in these regions. This effect was recorded in the high-field case with the input and reflected laser modes in the near-field, as shown in Figure
The reflectivity was recorded by means of an ImagingSource DMK23UP1300 CCD imaging a Spectralon panel. Calibrated filters were placed in front of the CCD and the camera integration time was changed to enable the high-dynamic-range measurement. Absolute calibration for the high- and low-field measurements was performed by placing a protected silver mirror out of focus and reflecting the light directly onto the Spectralon panel.
Since the thickness of the sheet varies most drastically along its vertical length, from 500 nm to greater than
These results are consistent with the constructive maxima shown in Figure
Following the same procedure, the high-field reflectivity was recorded with the same experimental setup, but with
The pointing stability of the reflected pulse from the plasma mirror in the high field, as shown in Figure
5.4 Discussion of experimental results
Here, we have demonstrated, to our knowledge, the first liquid-based plasma mirror with etalon-like anti-reflection properties, capable of operating at repetition rates exceeding 1 kHz. The temporal contrast enhancement of 690 is comparable to, or exceeds, results reported for both solid-state and liquid-based plasma mirrors operating at substantially lower repetition rates. This technique is highly stable and, with two high-pressure syringe pumps, can be operated indefinitely.
These results, however, are not without drawbacks, which may limit the applicability of the described plasma mirror. The usable area on the plasma mirror, over which the low-field reflectivity is minimized and the sheet is locally flat, is approximately
Operation of the plasma mirror at the third etalon minima also limits the bandwidth-dependent low-field reflectivity. The ideal operational thickness condition is at the minima, centered around 300 nm. This lower minima permits a broader wavelength tolerance and lower low-field reflectivity over a larger range of sheet thicknesses.
To be clear, there are advantages and disadvantages to the use of a conventional anti-reflection-coated dielectric plasma mirror as compared to the liquid-based approach described here. Dielectric plasma mirrors afford the user a large and variable surface area to irradiate. This enables tuning of the intensity at the plasma mirror surface for optimization of high-field reflectivity, nearly independent of the pulse duration and energy used. The low-field reflectivity for these devices is well characterized and designed to match the laser wavelength, bandwidth, and angle of incidence. In optimized conditions, contrast enhancements of up to
The liquid-microjet-based plasma mirror device described here is advantageous for its low cost per shot, low to no debris generation, and high-repetition-rate usability. However, due to the limited area at which the sheet is at or near the destructive minima, the maximal pulse energy is somewhat limited by the optimal intensity for maximum reflectivity. Other disadvantages include difficulty in implementation of the microjet system in a vacuum environment, which may require significant alteration of the vacuum system.
Nonetheless, the results presented here establish a proof-of-principle demonstration of one such optical element commonly used in low-repetition-rate LPI studies, but now through the adoption of a fluid media, adaptable for use in high-repetition-rate operation. Future developments in the creation of submicron-thick liquid sheets will serve to further improve the range of laser parameters under which this type of device can be of use. Additionally, we hope to see the invention of other complementary liquid-based optical elements, such as the aforementioned plasma focusing optics.
6 Practical considerations
As previously mentioned, we use ethylene glycol in the experiments presented in this paper. By commenting on desirable properties of liquids for these experiments and other constraints, this section provides some justification of this choice and other considerations for using other liquids for experiments of this kind. As will be discussed, for experiments requiring a vacuum environment, selecting a liquid with a low vapor pressure is important, and there are other concerns for the design of the vacuum pump system to be considered; however, for experiments that do not require vacuum conditions, a wider range of liquids can be employed (for example, Ref. [
As we anticipate the development of relativistically intense laser systems with repetition rates of kHz or higher, we estimate the maximum potential repetition rate for the cylindrical jet, droplet, and sheet targets. This measurement is performed by use of pump–probe shadowgraphy with high temporal resolution over microsecond time delays. With this technique, we determine the time required to reestablish a new target in the interaction region and infer the potential for use at repetition rates in excess of 1 kHz.
6.1 Vacuum operation with liquid microjets
In the experimental study of high-intensity LPI, vacuum operation is necessary in order to prevent nonlinear effects from degrading beam quality during propagation to the target[
While the liquid target system is compatible with a number of fluids, those with low vapor pressure are ideal for low-vacuum operation. Counter to this point is the added constraint of relatively low viscosity. In practical application, the fluid viscosity is limited only by the available pump pressure. Due to the choked flow nature of the long-aspect-ratio glass capillary orifices, the bias pressure required for flow is increased as compared to less restrictive nozzles. Use of scanning electron microscope apertures or tapered nozzles reduces this constraint, and enables the use of higher-viscosity and lower-vapor-pressure fluids for the same bias pressure.
Another important fluid characteristic to consider is debris-free operation. The amount of debris generated with high-repetition-rate lasers, as compared to the low-repetition-rate systems currently used, is substantially increased. Metal-based targets, when used with low-repetition-rate systems, typically rely on the low number of laser shots or thin pellicles in order to avoid appreciable accumulation of ablated material from deteriorating or damaging sensitive optics and diagnostics. Liquid metals present low vapor pressures, but produce debris accumulation within the vacuum environment, rendering them unsuitable for high-intensity, high-repetition-rate work[
Use of the appropriate debris-free fluid, where excess target material is evacuated from the chamber as gas load on the vacuum pumps, significantly aids operation. Further, cleanup is expedited and removal of target material build-up on delicate optics is rendered unnecessary.
In our work to improve vacuum levels during liquid sheet target operation, we learned fluid containment and extraction in the form of a proper fluid catcher design is crucial. Initial efforts to improve liquid collection and vacuum isolation of the main chamber from the fluid catch chamber used small-aperture orifices. As the syringe pump is brought to pressure, droplets fall from the glass capillaries into the orifice, forming a meniscus. Once brought to pressure, the liquid microjet does not produce enough pressure to blow out the meniscus, and instead causes entrainment[
Bubbling at the catch orifice was resolved by utilizing a relatively large, 4 mm diameter orifice where the initial droplets fell through the aperture and did not form a meniscus. A slide was placed in the catcher below the orifice to intercept and guide the microjet stream further into the catch tube. Without the slide, uncontrolled splashing rapidly increases the available surface area for evaporation. This results in increased gas pressure within the catch tube, generating a backflow of gas near the orifice, disturbing the sheet stability.
The complete vacuum system used in this work is illustrated in Figure
With the above-described catcher orifice and slide implemented, a base pressure of 500 microtorr was achieved with a
There is a threshold where the amount of ablated material from the laser–matter interaction cannot be effectively removed from the vacuum chamber. As a result, the chamber pressure increases above the ultimate base pressure, as in the case presented above. This resulting vacuum pressure may be too high to operate high-voltage-biased diagnostics such as Thomson parabolic spectrometers or to avoid nonlinear optical effects from impacting beam quality. Efforts to further improve the vacuum compatibility of the fluid or configuration of the liquid containment system are ineffective methods to decrease the ambient pressure under these circumstances, since the ablated material from the LPI is the primary degrading cause.
Instead, one must deal directly with the amount of ablated material created. Some proposed methods to address this issue are: decreasing the laser power through a reduction in pulse energy or repetition rate, increasing the pumping rate, or implementing reduced-mass targets. The first approach works in direct competition to the desired high-repetition-rate, high-average-power operation of these laser systems. Increasing the pumping rate on the vacuum chamber is relatively straightforward, albeit somewhat costly. Use of reduced-mass targets may present the most promising approach, in that it directly limits the potential amount of ablated material.
Associated with the impact of background gas density of the vacuum chamber is the preplasma density gradient, which can significantly impact electron and ion acceleration as well as surface harmonic generation[
Behavior of the evaporated molecules can then be characterized by the Knudsen number,
Heissler
In the case of ion acceleration with an ethylene glycol sheet target, Morrison
Aside from the presence of low-density gas surrounding the liquid target surface, which even for the case of water is orders of magnitude below critical density, the liquid targets behave similarly to their solid counterparts in terms of preplasma formation. Prepulses which are intense enough to ionize the target surface will ablate away target material and generate a similar preplasma with comparable scale lengths to those from solid targets. Experimental evidence has shown that liquid targets can successfully be used for surface high-harmonic generation and electron and ion acceleration[
The issues presented here, and many other unforeseen issues of practical application, will have to be addressed to move forward with high-repetition-rate LPI studies.
6.2 Repetition rate capability
A practical consideration for application is the maximum possible repetition rate that these targets can support. In order to address this, pump–probe shadowgraphy was used to image the time evolution of the target geometry, along with the appearance of target debris in the region surrounding the laser–target interaction out to the
The following analysis is illustrated in the frames shown in Figure
The time evolution of the large primary droplet type is shown in Figures
Approximately
Lastly, we evaluated the sheet target as shown in Figures
One practical point of discussion with regards to the repetition rate capabilities is that of scaling with pulse energy. As the pulse energy increases, the amount of material which is ablated and the resulting damage spot both increase. We expect that for joule-class lasers the repetition rate capabilities of these target types will be lower than the few millijoule case which we present. In 1 ms the fluid will propagate 2 cm, which is nearly an order of magnitude above the extent of the damage expected from joule-class lasers[
7 Conclusion
We have described the use of fluids, based on high-velocity, laminar-flowing, liquid microjets, as targets and optics for the application and study of high-intensity laser–plasma interactions at
Complementary to this effort, we demonstrate a consumable, liquid optical element in the form of a plasma mirror capable of operation at kHz repetition rates. The mirror provides etalon-like thin film destructive interference with 0.1% reflectivity for low optical intensities. At high intensities, where the mirror is in the plasma phase, this configuration produced 69% reflectivity.
We discussed the practical implementation of either target or plasma mirror, including the compatibility of various microjet fluids with in-vacuum operation below 1 millitorr. Lastly, we illustrated through pump–probe shadowgraphy the repetition rate capabilities which exceed 10 kHz.
The above-described targets and optics can be implemented in a wide range of future studies with scope beyond the field of high-intensity laser–plasma interactions. The self-refreshing nature of the targets would present them as ideal for destructive or consumable operation in studies of high-harmonic generation[
The flowing-liquid targets and optics we presented are two pieces of a new, high-repetition-rate mode of operation for research involving high-intensity laser–plasma interactions – a mode of operation meeting new demands from the development, construction, and availability of high-repetition-rate, relativistically intense lasers. Flowing-liquid targets and optics scale well to very high repetition rates, while providing densities higher than gas-based targets. Compared with using solids for the same purpose, flowing liquids present a large debris-free, vacuum-compatible, and self-refreshing alternative. This enables relativistic LPI to generate quasi-continuous, high-average-flux sources of electrons, ions, X-rays, and neutrons for use in future application. For these reasons, we encourage the community to adopt this technique to move forward to new and exciting applications.
References
[1] P. H. Stephen, C. G. Brown, T. E. Cowan, E. A. Henry, J. S. Johnson, M. H. Key, J. A. Koch, A. Bruce Langdon, B. F. Lasinski, R. W. Lee, A. J. Mackinnon, D. M. Pennington, M. D. Perry, T. W. Phillips, M. Roth, C. T. Sangster, M. S. Singh, R. A. Snavely, M. A. Stoyer, S. C. Wilks, K. Yasuike. Phys. Plasmas, 7, 2076(2000).
[2] R. A. Snavely, M. H. Key, S. P. Hatchett, T. E. Cowan, M. Roth, T. W. Phillips, M. A. Stoyer, E. A. Henry, T. C. Sangster, M. S. Singh, S. C. Wilks, A. MacKinnon, A. Offenberger, D. M. Pennington, K. Yasuike, A. B. Langdon, B. F. Lasinski, J. Johnson, M. D. Perry, E. M. Campbell. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 2945(2000).
[3] T. Esirkepov, M. Borghesi, S. V. Bulanov, G. Mourou, T. Tajima. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 175003(2004).
[4] S. Kar, M. Borghesi, S. V. Bulanov, M. H. Key, T. V. Liseykina, A. Macchi, A. J. Mackinnon, P. K. Patel, L. Romagnani, A. Schiavi, O. Willi. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 225004(2008).
[5] L. Yin, B. J. Albright, B. M. Hegelich, K. J. Bowers, K. A. Flippo, T. J. T. Kwan, J. C. Fernández. Phys. Plasmas, 14(2007).
[6] P. Kaw, J. Dawson. Phys. Fluids, 13, 472(1970).
[7] P. Sprangle, C. Tang, E. Esarey. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 15, 145(1987).
[8] S. Guerin, P. Mora, J. C. Adam, A. Héron, G. Laval. Phys. Plasmas, 3, 2693(1996).
[9] G. M. Petrov, J. Davis. Appl. Phys. B, 96, 773(2009).
[10] T. Bartal, M. E. Foord, C. Bellei, M. H. Key, K. A. Flippo, S. A. Gaillard, D. T. Offermann, P. K. Patel, L. C. Jarrott, D. P. Higginson, M. Roth, A. Otten, D. Kraus, R. B. Stephens, H. S. McLean, E. M. Giraldez, M. S. Wei, D. C. Gautier, F. N. Beg. Nat. Phys., 8, 139(2012).
[11] T. Ceccotti, A. Lévy, H. Popescu, F. Réau, P. dfıOliveira, P. Monot, J. P. Geindre, E. Lefebvre, P. Martin. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 185002(2007).
[12] H. Schwoerer, S. Pfotenhauer, O. Jäckel, K.-U. Amthor, B. Liesfeld, W. Ziegler, R. Sauerbrey, K. W. D. Ledingham, T. Esirkepov. Nature, 439, 445(2006).
[13] S. P. Gordon, T. Donnelly, A. Sullivan, H. Hamster, R. W. Falcone. Opt. Lett., 19, 484(1994).
[14] S. Jiang, L. L. Ji, H. Audesirk, K. M. George, J. Snyder, A. Krygier, P. Poole, C. Willis, R. Daskalova, E. Chowdhury, N. S. Lewis, D. W. Schumacher, A. Pukhov, R. R. Freeman, K. U. Akli. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(2016).
[15] S. Jiang, A. G. Krygier, D. W. Schumacher, K. U. Akli, R. R. Freeman. Eur. Phys. J. D, 68, 283(2014).
[16] A. Pak, S. Kerr, N. Lemos, A. Link, P. Patel, F. Albert, L. Divol, B. B. Pollock, D. Haberberger, D. Froula, M. Gauthier, S. H. Glenzer, A. Longman, L. Manzoor, R. Fedosejevs, S. Tochitsky, C. Joshi, F. Fiuza. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 21, 103401(2018).
[17] A. J. Mackinnon, M. Borghesi, S. Hatchett, M. H. Key, P. K. Patel, H. Campbell, A. Schiavi, R. Snavely, S. C. Wilks, O. Willi. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 1769(2001).
[18] M. Hegelich, S. Karsch, G. Pretzler, D. Habs, K. Witte, W. Guenther, M. Allen, A. Blazevic, J. Fuchs, J. C. Gauthier, M. Geissel, P. Audebert, T. Cowan, M. Roth. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89(2002).
[19] M. Borghesi, A. J. Mackinnon, D. H. Campbell, D. G. Hicks, S. Kar, P. K. Patel, D. Price, L. Romagnani, A. Schivai, O. Willi. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92(2004).
[20] J. Schreiber, M. Kaluza, F. Grüner, U. Schramm, B. M. Hegelich, J. Cobble, M. Geissler, E. Brambrink, J. Fuchs, P. Audebert, D. Habs, K. Witte. Appl. Phys. B, 79, 1041(2004).
[21] Y. Glinec, J. Faure, L. Le Dain, S. Darbon, T. Hosokai, J. J. Santos, E. Lefebvre, J.-P. Rousseau, F. Burgy, B. Mercier, V. Malka. Phys. Rev. Lett., 94(2005).
[22] M. M. Murnane, H. C. Kapteyn, M. D. Rosen, R. W. Falcone. Science, 251, 531(1991).
[23] G. A. Mourou, C. P. Barty, M. D. Perry. and “Ultrahigh-intensity laser: physics of the extreme on a tabletop”, Technical Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1997)..
[24] S. M. Hooker. Nat. Photon., 7, 775(2013).
[25] S. Chatziathanasiou, S. Kahaly, E. Skantzakis, G. Sansone, R. Lopez-Martens, S. Haessler, K. Varju, G. Tsakiris, D. Charalambidis, P. Tzallas. Photonics, 26(2017).
[26] O. Jahn, V. E. Leshchenko, P. Tzallas, A. Kessel, M. Krüger, A. Münzer, S. A. Trushin, G. D. Tsakiris, S. Kahaly, D. Kormin, L. Veisz, V. Pervak, F. Krausz, Z. Major, S. Karsch. Optica, 6, 280(2019).
[27] A. G. Mordovanakis, J. Easter, N. Naumova, K. Popov, P.-E. Masson-Laborde, B. Hou, I. Sokolov, G. Mourou, I. V. Glazyrin, W. Rozmus, V. Bychenkov, J. Nees, K. Krushelnick. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, 235001(2009).
[28] M. Thévenet, A. Leblanc, S. Kahaly, H. Vincenti, A. Vernier, F. Quéré, J. Faure. Nat. Phys., 12, 355(2016).
[29] M. Thévenet, H. Vincenti, J. Faure. Phys. Plasmas, 23(2016).
[30] H. Habara, K. Ohta, K. A. Tanaka, G. Ravindra Kumar, M. Krishnamurthy, S. Kahaly, S. Mondal, M. K. Bhuyan, R. Rajeev, J. Zheng. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104(2010).
[31] H. Habara, K. Ohta, K. A. Tanaka, G. Ravindra Kumar, M. Krishnamurthy, S. Kahaly, S. Mondal, M. K. Bhuyan, R. Rajeev, J. Zheng. Phys. Plasmas, 17(2010).
[32] A. Lifschitz, F. Sylla, S. Kahaly, A. Flacco, M. Veltcheva, G. Sanchez-Arriaga, E. Lefebvre, V. Malka. New J. Phys., 16(2014).
[33] S. Kahaly, F. Sylla, A. Lifschitz, A. Flacco, M. Veltcheva, V. Malka. Sci. Rep., 6, 31647(2016).
[34] S. V. Bulanov, V. S. Khoroshkov. Plasma Phys. Rep., 28, 453(2002).
[35] S. V. Bulanov, T. Z. Esirkepov, V. S. Khoroshkov, A. V. Kuznetsov, F. Pegoraro. Phys. Lett. A, 299, 240(2002).
[36] L. Disdier, J. P. Garconnet, G. Malka, J. L. Miquel. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, 1454(1999).
[37] P. A. Norreys, A. P. Fews, F. N. Beg, A. R. Bell, A. E. Dangor, P. Lee, M. B. Nelson, H. Schmidt, M. Tatarakis, M. D. Cable. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 40, 175(1998).
[38] T. E. Cowan, M. D. Perry, M. H. Key, T. R. Ditmire, S. P. Hatchett, E. A. Henry, J. D. Moody, M. J. Moran, D. M. Pennington, T. W. Phillips, T. C. Sangster, J. A. Sefcik, M. S. Singh, R. A. Snavely, M. A. Stoyer, S. C. Wilks, P. E. Young, Y. Takahashi, B. Dong, W. Fountain, T. Parnell, J. Johnson, A. W. Hunt, T. Kuhl. Laser Part. Beams, 17, 773(1999).
[39] C. Danson, D. Hillier, N. Hopps, D. Neely. High Power Laser Sci. Eng., 3, e3(2015).
[40] C. L. Haefner, A. Bayramian, S. Betts, R. Bopp, S. Buck, J. Cupal, M. Drouin, A. Erlandson, J. Horáček, J. Horner, J. Jarboe, J. Kasi, D. Kim, E. Koh, L. Koubikova, W. Maranville, C. Marshall, D. Mason, J. Menapace, P. Miller, P. Mazurek, A. Naylon, J. Novak, D. Peceli, P. Rossi, J. Schaffers, E. Sistrunk, D. Smith, T. Spinka, J. Stanley, R. Steele, C. Stolz, T. Suratwala, S. Telford, J. Thoma, D. VanBlarcom, J. Weiss, P. Wegner. Proc. SPIE, 10241, 1024102(2017).
[41] E. Sistrunk, T. Spinka, A. Bayramian, S. Betts, R. Bopp, S. Buck, K. Charron, J. Cupal, R. Deri, M. Drouin, A. Erlandson, E. S. Fulkerson, J. Horner, J. Joracek, J. Jarboe, J. Kasl, D. Kim, E. Koh, L. Koubikova, R. Lanning, W. Maranville, C. Marshall, D. Mason, J. Menapace, P. Miller, P. Mazurek, A. Maylon, J. Novak, D. Peceli, P. Rosso, K. Schaffers, D. Smith, J. Stanley, R. Steele, S. Telford, J. Thoma, D. VanBlarcom, J. Weiss, P. Wegner, B. Rus, C. Haefner. CLEO: Science and Innovations(2017).
[42] B. Rus, P. Bakule, D. Kramer, J. Naylon, J. Thoma, M. Fibrich, J. T. Green, J. C. Lagron, R. Antipenkov, J. Bartoníček, F. Batysta, R. Base, R. Boge, S. Buck, J. Cupla, M. A. Drouin, M. Durak, B. Himmel, T. Havlicek, P. Homer, A. Honsa, M. Horacek, P. Hribek, J. Hubacek, Z. Hubka, G. Kalinchenko, K. Kasi, L. Indra, P. Korous, M. Koselja, L. Koubikova, M. Laub, T. Mazanec, A. Meadows, J. Novak, D. Peceli, J. Polan, D. Snopek, V. Sobr, P. Trojek, B. Tykalewicz, P. Velpula, E. Verhagen, S. Vyhlidka, J. Weiss, C. Haefner, A. Bayramian, S. Betts, T. Spinka, J. Stanley, C. Stolz, T. Suratwala, S. Telford, T. Ditmire, E. Gaul, M. Donovan, C. Frederickson, G. Friedman, D. Hammond, D. Hidinger, G. Cheriaux, A. Jochmann, M. Kepler, C. Malato, M. Maritnez, T. Metzger, M. Schultze, P. Mason, K. Ertel, A. Lintern, C. Edwards, C. Hernandez-Gomez, J. Collier. Proc. SPIE, 10241(2017).
[43] S. Mondal, M. Shirozhan, N. Ahmed, M. Bocoum, F. Boehle, A. Vernier, S. Haessler, R. Lopez-Martens, F. Sylla, C. Sire, F. Quéré, K. Nelissen, C. Varjú, S. Kahaly. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 35, A93(2018).
[44] S. Weber, S. Bechet, S. Borneis, L. Brabec, M. Bučka, E. Chacon-Golcher, M. Ciappina, M. DeMarco, A. Fajstavr, K. Falk, E.-R. Garcia, J. Grosz, Y.-J. Gu, J.-C. Hernandez, M. Holec, P. Janečka, M. Jantač, M. Jirka, H. Kadlecova, D. Khikhlukha, O. Klimo, G. Korn, D. Kramer, D. Kumar, T. Lastovička, P. Lutoslawski, L. Morejon, V. Olšovocová, M. Rajdl, O. Renner, B. Rus, S. Singh, M. Šmid, M. Sokol, R. Versaci, R. Vrána, M. Vranic, J. Vyskočil, A. Wolf, Q. Yu. Matter Radiat. Extremes, 2, 149(2018).
[45] S. Kühn, M. Dumergue, S. Kahaly, S. Mondal, M. Füle, T. Csizmadia, B. Farkas, B. Major, Z. Várallyay, E. Cormier, M. Kalashikov, F. Calegari, M. Devetta, F. Frassetto, E. Månsson, L. Poletto, S. Stagira, C. Vozzi, M. Nisoli, P. Rudawski, S. Maclot, F. Campi, H. Wikmark, C. L. Arnold, C. M. Heyl, P. Johnsson, A. L’Huillier, R. Lopez-Martens, S. Haessler, M. Bocoum, F. Boehle, A. Vernier, G. Iaquaniello, E. Skantzakis, N. Papadakis, C. Kalpouzos, P. Tzallas, F. Lépine, D. Charalambidis, K. Varjú, K. Osvay, G. Sansone. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 50, 132002(2017).
[46] W. Leemans. “Laser technology for k-BELLA and beyond”, Technical Report, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2017)..
[47] I. Prencipe, J. Fuchs, S. Pascarelli, D. W. Schumacher, R. B. Stephens, N. B. Alexander, R. Briggs, M. Büscher, M. O. Cernaianu, A. Choukourov, M. DeMarco, A. Erbe, J. Fassbender, G. Fiquet, P. Fitzsimmons, C. Gheorghui, J. Hund, L. G. Huang, M. Harmand, N. J. Hartley, A. Irman, T. Kluge, Z. Konopkova, S. Kraft, D. Kraus, V. Leca, D. Margarone, J. Metzkes, K. Nagai, W. Nazarov, P. Putoslawski, D. Papp, M. Passoni, A. Pelka, J. P. Perin, J. Schulz, M. Smid, C. Spindloe, S. Steinke, R. Torchio, C. Vass, T. Wiste, R. Zaffino, K. Zeil, T. Tschentscher, U. Schramm, T. E. Cowan. High Power Laser Sci. Eng., 5, e17(2017).
[48] H. C. Kapteyn, M. M. Murnane, A. Szoke, R. W. Falcone. Opt. Lett., 16, 490(1991).
[49] R. K. Kirkwood, D. P. Turnbull, T. Chapman, S. C. Wilks, M. D. Rosen, R. A. London, L. A. Pickworth, W. H. Dunlop, J. D. Moody, D. J. Strozzi, P. A. Michel, L. Divol, O. L. Landen, B. J. MacGowan, B. M. Van Wonterghem, K. B. Fournier, B. E. Blue. Nat. Phys., 14, 80(2018).
[50] A. Thoss, M. Richardson, G. Korn, M. Faubel, H. Stiel, U. Vogt, T. Elsaesser. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 20, 224(2003).
[51] A. Thoß. “X-ray emission and particle acceleration from a liquid jet target using a 1-kHz ultrafast laser system”, PhD. Thesis (Freie Universität Berlin, 2003)..
[52] L. Rayleigh. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 1, 4(1878).
[53] H. M. Ryan, W. E. Anderson, S. Pal, R. J. Santoro. J. Propul. Power, 11, 135(1995).
[54] K. R. Wilson, B. S. Rude, T. Catalano, R. D. Schaller, J. G. Tobin, D. T. Co, R. J. Saykally. J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 3346(2001).
[55] J. Eggers, E. Villermaux. Rep. Prog. Phys., 71(2008).
[56] A. G. Darbyshire, T. Mullin. J. Fluid Mech., 289, 83(1995).
[57] O. Reynolds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 174, 935(1883).
[58] H. Faisst, B. Eckhardt. J. Fluid Mech., 504, 343(2004).
[59] W. van Hoeve, S. Gekle, J. H. Snoeijer, M. Versluis, M. P. Brenner, D. Lohse. Phys. Fluids, 22, 122003(2010).
[60] A. Kalaaji, B. Lopez, P. Attane, A. Soucemarianadin. Phys. Fluids, 15, 2469(2003).
[61] W. T. Pimbley, H. C. Lee. IBM J. Res. Dev., 21, 21(1977).
[62] P. Monot, T. Auguste, L. A. Lompré, G. Mainfray, C. Manus. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 9, 1579(1992).
[63] A. Sullivan, H. Hamster, S. P. Gordon, R. W. Falcone, H. Nathel. Opt. Lett., 19, 1544(1994).
[64] T. Nayuki, Y. Oishi, T. Fujii, K. Nemoto, T. Kayoiji, Y. Okano, Y. Hironaka, K. G. Nakamura, K.-i. Kondo, K. Ueda. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 74, 3293(2003).
[65] M. Noaman-ul Haq, H. Ahmed, T. Sokollik, L. Yu, Z. Liu, X. Yuan, F. Yuan, M. Mirzaie, X. Ge, L. Chen, J. Zhang. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 20(2017).
[66] A. G. Mordovanakis, P.-E. Masson-Laborde, J. Easter, K. Popov, B. Hou, G. Mourou, W. Rozmus, M. G. Haines, J. Nees, K. Krushelnick. Appl. Phys. Lett., 96(2010).
[67] A. Borot, A. Malvache, X. Chen, A. Jullien, J.-P. Geindre, P. Audebert, G. Mourou, F. Quéré, R. Lopez-Martens. Nat. Phys., 8, 416(2012).
[68] J. T. Morrison, E. A. Chowdhury, K. D. Frische, S. Feister, V. Ovchinnikov, J. Nees, C. Orban, R. R. Freeman, W. M. Roquemore. Phys. Plasmas, 22(2015).
[69] L. C. Mountford, R. A. Smith, M. H. R. Hutchinson. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 69, 3780(1998).
[70] J. B. Kim, S. Göde, S. H. Glenzer. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 87, 11E328(2016).
[71] M. Gauthier, C. B. Curry, S. Göde, F.-E. Brack, J. B. Kim, M. J. MacDonald, J. Metzkes, L. Obst, M. Rehwald, C. Rödel, H. P. Schlenvoigt, W. Schumaker, U. Schramm, K. Zeil, S. H. Glenzer. Appl. Phys. Lett., 111, 114102(2017).
[72] P. L. Poole, C. D. Andereck, D. W. Schumacher, R. L. Daskalova, S. Feister, K. M. George, C. Willis, K. U. Akli, E. A. Chowdhury. Phys. Plasmas, 21(2014).
[73] P. L. Poole, C. Willis, G. E. Cochran, R. T. Hanna, C. D. Andereck, D. W. Schumacher. Appl. Phys. Lett., 109, 151109(2016).
[74] S. Feister, J. A. Nees, J. T. Morrison, K. D. Frische, C. Orban, E. A. Chowdhury, W. M. Roquemore. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 85, 11D602(2014).
[75] M. Ekimova, W. Quevedo, M. Faubel, P. Wernet, E. T. J. Nibbering. Struct. Dyn., 2(2015).
[76] G. Galinis, J. Strucka, J. C. T. Barnard, A. Braun, R. A. Smith, J. P. Marangos. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 88(2017).
[77] C. Orban, J. T. Morrison, E. A. Chowdhury, J. A. Nees, K. Frische, S. Feister, W. M. Roquemore. Phys. Plasmas, 22(2015).
[78] G. K. Ngirmang, C. Orban, S. Feister, J. T. Morrison, K. D. Frische, E. A. Chowdhury, W. M. Roquemore. Phys. Plasmas, 23(2016).
[79] S. Feister, D. R. Austin, J. T. Morrison, K. D. Frische, C. Orban, G. Ngirmang, A. Handler, J. R. H. Smith, M. Schillaci, J. LaVerne, E. A. Chowdhury, R. R. Freeman, W. M. Roquemore. Opt. Express, 25, 18736(2017).
[80] C. A. Stan, D. Milathianaki, H. Laksmono, R. G. Sierra, T. A. McQueen, M. Messerschmidt, G. J. Williams, J. E. Koglin, T. J. Lane, M. J. Hayes, S. A. H. Guillet, M. Liang, A. L. Aquila, P. R. Willmott, J. Robinson, K. L. Gumerlock, S. Botha, K. Nass, I. Schlichting, R. L. Shoeman, H. A. Stone, S. Boutet. Nat. Phys., 12, 966(2016).
[81] A. R. Bell, J. R. Davies, S. Guerin, H. Ruhl. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 39, 653(1997).
[82] M. Schnürer, D. Hilscher, U. Jahnke, S. Ter-Avetisyan, S. Busch, M. Kalachnikov, H. Stiel, P. V. Nickles, W. Sandner. Phys. Rev. E, 70(2004).
[83] S. Karsch, S. Düsterer, H. Schwoerer, F. Ewald, D. Habs, M. Hegelich, G. Pretzler, A. Pukhov, K. Witte, R. Sauerbrey. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91(2003).
[84] G. D. Martin, S. D. Hoath, I. M. Hutchings. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 105(2008).
[85] D. J. Perduijn. “Method of manufacturing jet nozzle ducts, and ink jet printer comprising a jet nozzle duct manufactured by means of the method”, US Patent 4,418,354 (1983)..
[86] P. Chvykov, W. Ongg, J. Easter, B. Hou, J. Nees, K. Krushelnick. J. Appl. Phys., 108, 113301(2010).
[87] J. Yu, Z. Jiang, J. C. Kieffer, A. Krol. Phys. Plasmas, 6, 1318(1999).
[88] B. Dromey, M. Zepf, A. Gopal, K. Lancaster, M. S. Wei, K. Krushelnick, M. Tatarakis, N. Vakakis, S. Moustaizis, R. Kodama, M. Tampo, C. Stoeckl, R. Clarke, H. Habara, D. Neely, S. Karsch, P. Norreys. Nat. Phys., 2, 456(2006).
[89] D. Hasson, R. E. Peck. AIChE J., 10, 752(1964).
[90] Y. J. Choo, B. S. Kang. Exp. Fluids, 31, 56(2001).
[91] J. W. M. Bush, A. E. Hasha. J. Fluid Mech., 511, 285(2004).
[92] J. D. Koralek, J. B. Kim, P. Bruza, C. B. Curry, Z. Chen, H. A. Bechtel, A. A. Cordones, P. Sperling, S. Toleikis, J. F. Kern, S. P. Moeller, S. H. Glenzer, D. P. DePonte. Nat. Commun., 9, 1353(2018).
[93] J. T. Morrison, S. Feister, K. D. Frische, D. R. Austin, G. K. Ngirmang, N. R. Murphy, C. Orban, E. A. Chowhury, W. M. Roquemore. New J. Phys., 20(2018).
[94] B. Hou, J. Nees, J. Easter, J. Davis, G. Petrov, A. Thomas, K. Krushelnick. Appl. Phys. Lett., 95, 101503(2009).
[95] C. Palmer. New J. Phys., 20(2018).
[96] P. M. Nilson, W. Theobald, J. F. Myatt, C. Stoeckl, M. Storm, J. D. Zuegel, R. Betti, D. D. Meyerhofer, T. C. Sangster. Phys. Rev. E, 79(2009).
[97] A. J. Mackinnon, Y. Sentoku, P. K. Patel, D. W. Price, S. Hatchett, M. H. Key, C. Andersen, R. Snavely, R. R. Freeman. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 215006(2002).
[98] D. T. Offermann, K. A. Flippo, S. A. Gaillard, D. C. Gautier, S. Letzring, J. C. Cobble, G. Wurden, R. P. Johnson, T. Shimada, D. S. Montgomery, R. P. Gonzales, T. Hurry, F. Archuleta, M. J. Schmitt, S. M. Reid, T. Bartal, M. S. Wei, D. P. Higginson, F. N. Beg, M. Geissel, M. Schollmeier. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 244(2010).
[99] H. Vincenti, S. Monchocé, S. Kahaly, G. Bonnaud, P. Martin, F. Quéré. Nat. Commun., 5, 3403(2014).
[100] A. Leblanc, S. Monchocé, C. Bourassin-Bouchet, S. Kahaly, F. Quéré. Nat. Phys., 12, 301(2016).
[101] A. Leblanc, S. Monchocé, H. Vincenti, S. Kahaly, J.-L. Vay, F. Quéré. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 155001(2017).
[102] K.-L. Pan, P.-C. Chou, Y.-J. Tseng. Phys. Rev. E, 80(2009).
[103] G. L. Switzer. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 62, 2765(1991).
[104] J. T. Morrison, M. Storm, E. Chowdhury, K. U. Akli, S. Feldman, C. Willis, R. L. Daskalova, T. Growden, P. Berger, T. Ditmire, L. Van Woerkom, R. R. Freeman. Phys. Plasmas, 19(2012).
[105] S. Kar, H. Ahmed, R. Prasad, M. Cerchez, S. Brauckmann, B. Aurand, G. Cantono, P. Hadjisolomou, C. L. S. Lewis, A. Macchi, G. Nersisyna, A. P. L. Robinson, A. M. Schroer, M. Swantusch, M. Zepf, O. Willi, M. Borghesi. Nat. Commun., 7, 10792(2016).
[106] S. Backus, H. C. Kapteyn, M. M. Murnane, D. M. Gold, H. Nathel, W. White. Opt. Lett., 18, 134(1993).
[107] D. Panasenko, A. J. Shu, A. Gonsalves, K. Nakamura, N. H. Matlis, C. Toth, W. P. Leemans. J. Appl. Phys., 108(2010).
[108] D. W. Schumacher, P. L. Poole, C. Willis, G. E. Cochran, R. Daskalova, J. Purcell, R. Heery. J. Instrum., 12(2017).
[109] P. L. Poole, A. Krygier, G. E. Cochran, P. S. Foster, G. G. Scott, L. A. Wilson, J. Bailey, N. Bourgeois, C. Hernandez-Gomez, D. Neely, P. P. Rajeev, R. R. Freeman, D. W. Schumacher. Sci. Rep., 6, 32041(2016).
[110] E. Sani, A. DellfiOro. Opt. Mater., 37, 36(2014).
[111] C. Ziener, P. S. Foster, E. J. Divall, C. J. Hooker, M. H. R. Hutchinson, A. J. Langley, D. Neely. J. Appl. Phys., 93, 768(2003).
[112] G. Doumy, F. Quéré, O. Gobert, M. Perdrix, P. Martin, P. Audebert, J. C. Gauthier, J.-P. Geindre, T. Wittmann. Phys. Rev. E, 69(2004).
[113] C. Thaury, F. Quéré, J.-P. Geindre, A. Levy, T. Ceccotti, P. Monot, M. Bougeard, F. Réau, P. dfıOliveira, P. Audebert, R. Marjoribanks, P. Martin. Nat. Phys., 3, 424(2007).
[114] Y. Cai, W. Wang, C. Xia, J. Liu, L. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Xu, Y. Leng, R. Li, Z. Xu. Phys. Plasmas, 16, 103104(2009).
[115] S. Inoue, K. Maeda, S. Tokita, K. Mori, K. Teramoto, M. Hashida, S. Sakabe. Appl. Opt., 55, 5647(2016).
[116] P. Heissler, E. Lugovoy, R. Hrlein, L. Waldecker, J. Wenz, M. Heigoldt, K. Khrennikov, S. Karsch, F. Krausz, B. Abel, G. D. Tsakiris. New J. Phys., 16, 113045(2014).
[117] E. Bliss, J. Hunt, P. Renard, G. Sommargren, H. Weaver. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 12, 402(1976).
[118] M. Mlejnek, E. M. Wright, J. V. Moloney. Phys. Rev. E, 58, 4903(1998).
[119] J. Sun, J. P. Longtin. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 21, 1081(2004).
[120] F. Paschen. Ann. Phys., 273, 69(1889).
[121] S. Fujioka, H. Nishimura, K. Nishihara, M. Murakami, Y.-G. Kang, Q. Gu, K. Nagai, T. Norimatsu, N. Miyanaga, Y. Izawa, K. Mima. Appl. Phys. Lett., 87, 241503(2005).
[122] K. Takenoshita, C.-s. Koay, S. Teerawattanasook, M. C. Richardson. Emerging Lithographic Technologies VIII, 954(2004).
[123] A. K. Biń. Chem. Engng Sci., 48, 3585(1993).
[124] X. Qu, A. Goharzadeh, L. Khezzar, A. Molki. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 44, 51(2013).
[125] M. KnudsenThe Kinetic Theory of Gases. (Metheun, London, 1934)..
[126] E. Hecht, A. Zajac. Optics(1974).
[127] B. Dromey, D. Adams, R. Hörlein, Y. Nomura, S. G. Rykovanov, D. C. Carroll, P. S. Foster, S. Kar, K. Markey, P. McKenna, D. Neely, M. Geissler, G. D. Tsakiris, M. Zepf. Nat. Phys., 5, 146(2009).
[128] C. Rödel, D. an der Brügge, J. Bierbach, M. Yeung, T. Hahn, B. Dromey, S. Herzer, S. Fuchs, A. Galestian Pour, E. Eckner, M. Behmke, M. Cerchez, O. Jäckel, D. Hemmers, T. Toncian, M. C. Kaluza, A. Belyanin, G. Pretzler, O. Willi, A. Pukhov, M. Zepf, G. G. Paulus. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 125002(2012).
[129] S. Kahaly, S. Monchocé, H. Vincenti, T. Dzelzainis, B. Dromey, M. Zepf, P. Martin, F. Quéré. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 175001(2013).
[130] F. Quéré, C. Thaury, J. P. Geindre, G. Bonnaud, P. Monot, P. Martin. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100(2008).
[131] T. T. Luu, Z. Yin, A. Jain, T. Gaumnitz, Y. Pertot, J. Ma, H. J. Wörner. Nat. Commun., 9, 3723(2018).
[132] V. E. Fortov. Phys.-Usp., 50, 333(2007).
[133] Y. Tsuboi, H. Fukumura, H. Masuhara. Appl. Phys. Lett., 64, 2745(1994).
[134] B. D. Strycker, M. M. Springer, A. J. Traverso, A. A. Kolomenskii, G. W. Kattawar, A. V. Sokolov. Opt. Express, 21, 23772(2013).
[135] U. Weierstall. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 369(2014).
[136] J. Kim, K. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, H. Ihee. Acta Crystallogr. A, 66, 270(2010).
[137] F. Mafuné, K. Miyajima, K. Tono, Y. Takeda, J.-y. Kohno, N. Miyauchi, J. Kobayashi, Y. Joti, E. Nango, S. Iwata, M. Yabashi. Acta Crystallogr. D, 72, 520(2016).
[138] J. W. Smith, R. J. Saykally. Chem. Rev., 117, 13909(2017).
[139] M. Fondell, S. Eckert, R. M. Jay, C. Weniger, W. Quevedo, J. Niskanen, B. Kennedy, F. Sorgenfrei, D. Schick, E. Giangrisostomi, R. Ovsyannikov, K. Adamczyk, N. Huse, P. Wernet, R. Mitzner, A. Fhlisch. Struct. Dyn., 4(2017).
[140] C. Kleine, M. Ekimova, G. Goldsztejn, S. Raabe, C. Strufkber, J. Ludwig, S. Yarlagadda, S. Eisebitt, M. J. J. Vrakking, T. Elsaesser, E. T. J. Nibbering, R. Arnaud. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 10, 52(2018).
[141] M. Ammann, L. Artiglia, T. Bartels-Rausch. Physical Chemistry of Gas–Liquid Interfaces, 135(2018).
[142] F. Blanco, A. M. Roldán, K. Krupa, R. P. McEachran, R. D. White, S. Marjanović, Z. Lj Petrović, M. J. Brunger, J. R. Machacek, S. J. Buckman, J. P. Sullivan, L. Chiari, P. Limão-Vieira, G. García. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 49, 145001(2016).
[143] W. Tattersall, L. Chiari, J. R. Machacek, E. Anderson, R. D. White, M. J. Brunger, S. J. Buckman, G. Garcia, F. Blanco, J. P. Sullivan. J. Chem. Phys., 140(2014).


Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address