• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 20, 2010007 (2021)
Qianwen Yang1、* and Ke Zhou1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electrical Engineering, Guizhou University, Guizhou, Guiyang 550025, China
  • 2Department of Brewing Engineering Automation, Moutai College, Zunyi, Guizhou 564507, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.2010007 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Qianwen Yang, Ke Zhou. Press-Plate State Recognition Based on Improved Bilinear Fine-Grained Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(20): 2010007 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure of the B-CNN
    Fig. 1. Structure of the B-CNN
    Process of the gradient calculation
    Fig. 2. Process of the gradient calculation
    Basic structure of the SENet
    Fig. 3. Basic structure of the SENet
    Flow chart of the SENet
    Fig. 4. Flow chart of the SENet
    Improved network structure
    Fig. 5. Improved network structure
    Structure of the residual unit
    Fig. 6. Structure of the residual unit
    Images of press-plate in different states. (a) guan; (b) kai; (c) NS1; (d) NS2
    Fig. 7. Images of press-plate in different states. (a) guan; (b) kai; (c) NS1; (d) NS2
    Flow chart of network training
    Fig. 8. Flow chart of network training
    Confusion matrix of different methods. (a) Our method; (b) B-CNN
    Fig. 9. Confusion matrix of different methods. (a) Our method; (b) B-CNN
    Grad-CAM diagrams with different opening and closing angles of the press-plate
    Fig. 10. Grad-CAM diagrams with different opening and closing angles of the press-plate
    Recognition results of different methods. (a) NS1; (b) NS2; (c) guan; (d) kai
    Fig. 11. Recognition results of different methods. (a) NS1; (b) NS2; (c) guan; (d) kai
    Accuracies of different methods
    Fig. 12. Accuracies of different methods
    Loss rates of different methods
    Fig. 13. Loss rates of different methods
    Accuracies of different methods in the test set
    Fig. 14. Accuracies of different methods in the test set
    NameConfiguration
    CPUIntel i5-5200U 2.20 GHz
    RAM8 GB
    GPUNVIDIA GeForce 920 M 4.0 G
    GPU acceleration libraryCUDA 9.0 cuDNN v7.1
    Deep learning frameworkPytorch1.1.0
    Table 1. Parameter of the experimental platform
    Experimental parameterScene setting
    Activation functionReLU
    Number of samples2672
    Learning initial speed10-4
    Rate decay coefficient0.01
    Input data dimension448×448×3
    Loss functioncross entropy
    Number of iterations3500
    Optimization algorithmAdam
    Activation functionSoftmax
    Output data dimension3
    Table 2. Initial parameters of the experiment
    ParameterActual value
    Predictive outputP'XTPXFP
    N'XFNXTN
    TotalPN
    Table 3. Confusion matrix
    MethodPPVTPR
    B-CNN0.920.91
    B-Se-ResNet0.980.94
    Hog+SVM0.880.87
    B-ResNet0.940.92
    DCL0.950.94
    CIN0.960.91
    Table 4. Evaluation indicators of different methods
    Qianwen Yang, Ke Zhou. Press-Plate State Recognition Based on Improved Bilinear Fine-Grained Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(20): 2010007
    Download Citation