• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 2, 020001 (2019)
Yanzong Zhou1、2, Chong Wang1、2, Yanping Liu1、2, and Haiyun Xia1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1 School of Earth and Space Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
  • 2 Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.020001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yanzong Zhou, Chong Wang, Yanping Liu, Haiyun Xia. Research Progress and Application of Coherent Wind Lidar[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(2): 020001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Coherent Doppler lidar schematic
    Fig. 1. Coherent Doppler lidar schematic
    Transmittance of the atmosphere from visible light to near infrared bands at different zenith angles
    Fig. 2. Transmittance of the atmosphere from visible light to near infrared bands at different zenith angles
    Laser gain medium and human eye maximum exposure rate in the near infrared band
    Fig. 3. Laser gain medium and human eye maximum exposure rate in the near infrared band
    Relationship between fiber loss and wavelength
    Fig. 4. Relationship between fiber loss and wavelength
    Relationship between solar radiation and laser wavelength
    Fig. 5. Relationship between solar radiation and laser wavelength
    NASA coherent lidar installation diagram and wind velocity measurement results. (a) Lidar prototype; (b) wind speed measurement results
    Fig. 6. NASA coherent lidar installation diagram and wind velocity measurement results. (a) Lidar prototype; (b) wind speed measurement results
    Mitsubishi electric corporation airborne lidar wind velocity measurement results. (a) Results of wind velocity; (b) periodic change in vertical acceleration; (c) periodic change in outside air temperature
    Fig. 7. Mitsubishi electric corporation airborne lidar wind velocity measurement results. (a) Results of wind velocity; (b) periodic change in vertical acceleration; (c) periodic change in outside air temperature
    Wind velocity measurement results of different radars. (a) Microwave radar; (b) Leosphere coherent lidar
    Fig. 8. Wind velocity measurement results of different radars. (a) Microwave radar; (b) Leosphere coherent lidar
    Halo-Photonics airborne lidar wind measurement results and boundary layer inversion results. (a) Coherent lidar backscatter coefficient; (b) vertical velocity standard deviation; (c) vertical velocity; (d) vertical velocity skewness
    Fig. 9. Halo-Photonics airborne lidar wind measurement results and boundary layer inversion results. (a) Coherent lidar backscatter coefficient; (b) vertical velocity standard deviation; (c) vertical velocity; (d) vertical velocity skewness
    All-fiber coherent wind lidar of USTC and results of wind velocity and direction. (a) Coherent lidar prototype; (b) wind velocity retrieved from both S and P states backscattering by single balanced detector, in which the inset shows the difference in velocity between S and P states; (c) horizontal wind speed; (d) horizontal wind direction
    Fig. 10. All-fiber coherent wind lidar of USTC and results of wind velocity and direction. (a) Coherent lidar prototype; (b) wind velocity retrieved from both S and P states backscattering by single balanced detector, in which the inset shows the difference in velocity between S and P states; (c) horizontal wind speed; (d) horizontal wind direction
    Detection distance and pulse energy parameters of 1.5 μm lidar research institutions
    Fig. 11. Detection distance and pulse energy parameters of 1.5 μm lidar research institutions
    NOAA lidar wind velocity measurement results. (a) Radial velocity data; (b) corresponding relative backscatter intensity profile
    Fig. 12. NOAA lidar wind velocity measurement results. (a) Radial velocity data; (b) corresponding relative backscatter intensity profile
    NASA lidar wind velocity and wind direction results measurement results. (a) Wind velocity; (b) wind direction
    Fig. 13. NASA lidar wind velocity and wind direction results measurement results. (a) Wind velocity; (b) wind direction
    Wind shear detected by Kowloon Observatory, Hong Kong, China
    Fig. 14. Wind shear detected by Kowloon Observatory, Hong Kong, China
    Aircraft wake vortex detected by ONERA. (a) Radial velocity of wake vortex model; (b) 3D view of mean velocity images
    Fig. 15. Aircraft wake vortex detected by ONERA. (a) Radial velocity of wake vortex model; (b) 3D view of mean velocity images
    Results of vertical wind velocity error and mixed layer height
    Fig. 16. Results of vertical wind velocity error and mixed layer height
    (a) Horizontal wind perturbations and (b)wavelet power spectra measured at 1.8 km and 6.7 km altitude
    Fig. 17. (a) Horizontal wind perturbations and (b)wavelet power spectra measured at 1.8 km and 6.7 km altitude
    OUC lidar wind velocity measurement results. (a) Lidar prototype; (b) wind velocity measurement results
    Fig. 18. OUC lidar wind velocity measurement results. (a) Lidar prototype; (b) wind velocity measurement results
    DetectionmethodCoherentdetectionCoherentdetectionCoherent detection /direct detectionCoherent detection /direct detectionDirectdetectionDirectdetection
    Wavelength /nm10600200015001060532355
    LaserCO2Tm∶YLuAG;Tm,Ho∶YAGRaman OPO-Nd∶YAG;ErNd∶YAGNd∶YAGNd∶YAG
    Reference[1][2][3][4][4][4]
    Detection objectAerosolAerosolAerosolAerosolMoleculeMolecule
    Table 1. Research status of Doppler wind lidar
    Company(year)Wavelength /μmEnergy /μJPulsewidth /nsPRF /HzDetectionrange /kmDistanceresolution /mTelescopediameter /mm
    Mitsubishi (2001)[37]1.54010900228150005-100
    Halo-Photonics (2004)[77]1.5621150--8--
    Mitsubishi (2010)[42]1.500550040001.57050
    FiberTek (2011)[34]1.50012080025000
    Mitsubishi (2012)[47]1.5501400580400030300150
    SgurrEnergy (2013)[74]1.550---4--
    ONERA (2014)[55]1.5455006501000016200-
    QinetiQ (2015)1.500--100000.220-
    NASA (2016)[30-31]1.500240400200000.4-1015-60101
    Leosphere (2017)1.540-25-200-12-1425-200-
    LMCT (2017)[29]1.6172500±500250±5075015100-
    Halo-Photonics (2017)1.562-800-1218-120-
    Table 2. Research institutes and parameters of 1.5 μm coherent lidar abroad
    Company (year)Wavelength /μmEnergy /μJPulsewidth /nsPRF /HzDetectionrange /kmDistanceresolution /mTelescopediameter/mm
    STIP (2011)[92]1.550100--3--
    SIOM (2012)[94]1.540435001000037550
    OUC (2015)[98]1.5505040010000460
    USTC (2017)[102]1.5481003001562566080
    Table 3. Research institutes and parameters of coherent Doppler lidar in China
    Yanzong Zhou, Chong Wang, Yanping Liu, Haiyun Xia. Research Progress and Application of Coherent Wind Lidar[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(2): 020001
    Download Citation