A. Bartolo, N. Vigne, M. Marconi, G. Beaudoin, L. Le Gratiet, K. Pantzas, I. Sagnes, A. Garnache, M. Giudici, "Spatiotemporally reconfigurable light in degenerate laser cavities," Photonics Res. 11, 1751 (2023)

Search by keywords or author
- Photonics Research
- Vol. 11, Issue 10, 1751 (2023)
![(a) Experimental setup showing the L-shaped VECSEL. HRM, high reflectivity beam splitter (>99.5% at 1.060 nm). Li are lenses whose focal lengths are f1=f4=8 mm, f2=100 mm, f3=200 mm. While in a cold cavity, the SI condition is reached for telescopic arrangement of optical elements, the presence of a thermal lens [41] due to an optical pump beam (fth≈10 mm WPp), requires slight correction to telescopic arrangement to achieve a degenerate condition. Accordingly, distances for SI condition are: d1=f1, with d1 the distance between gain section and L1; d2=f1+f2+z0, with d2 the distance between L1 and L2; d3=f2+f3−z0, with d3 the distance between L2 and L3; d4=f3+f4, with d4 the distance between L3 and L4; and d5=f4+x0, with d5 the distance between L4 and the SESAM. The correction terms to the telescopic configuration are given by z0=−fc22fth and x0=−fc42M2f22fth, where M=f3/f2=2. For typical pump power values used in our experiment (Pp≈170 mW) and fth≈60 mm:z0≈−0.53 mm and x0≈−0.8 μm [33]. (b) Microscope pictures of some of the masks deposited onto the gain mirror. Darker zones correspond to the Cr layer that provides losses larger than 90%. The masks shown exhibit arrangements of circular holes where the absorptive material has been removed. Diameters of holes (D) and separations between centers (T) are D=15 μm, T=30 μm in mask 1, D=30 μm, T=32 μm in mask 2, D=15 μm, T=16 μm in mask 3, D=15 μm, T=20 μm in mask 4. (c) Transverse profile of the losses and phase shift experienced by the electromagnetic field when reflected by the gain mirror around the Cr mask borderline. The Cr edge has less than 5 nm rising thickness. The phase shift of the mask is less than 2π/50.](/richHtml/prj/2023/11/10/1751/img_001.jpg)
Fig. 1. (a) Experimental setup showing the L-shaped VECSEL. HRM, high reflectivity beam splitter (> 99.5 % at 1.060 nm). L i are lenses whose focal lengths are f 1 = f 4 = 8 mm , f 2 = 100 mm , f 3 = 200 mm . While in a cold cavity, the SI condition is reached for telescopic arrangement of optical elements, the presence of a thermal lens [41] due to an optical pump beam (f th ≈ 10 mm W P p ), requires slight correction to telescopic arrangement to achieve a degenerate condition. Accordingly, distances for SI condition are: d 1 = f 1 , with d 1 the distance between gain section and L 1 ; d 2 = f 1 + f 2 + z 0 , with d 2 the distance between L 1 and L 2 ; d 3 = f 2 + f 3 − z 0 , with d 3 the distance between L 2 and L 3 ; d 4 = f 3 + f 4 , with d 4 the distance between L 3 and L 4 ; and d 5 = f 4 + x 0 , with d 5 the distance between L 4 and the SESAM. The correction terms to the telescopic configuration are given by z 0 = − f c 2 2 f th and x 0 = − f c 4 2 M 2 f 2 2 f th , where M = f 3 / f 2 = 2 . For typical pump power values used in our experiment (P p ≈ 170 mW ) and f th ≈ 60 mm : z 0 ≈ − 0.53 mm and x 0 ≈ − 0.8 μm [33]. (b) Microscope pictures of some of the masks deposited onto the gain mirror. Darker zones correspond to the Cr layer that provides losses larger than 90%. The masks shown exhibit arrangements of circular holes where the absorptive material has been removed. Diameters of holes (D ) and separations between centers (T ) are D = 15 μm , T = 30 μm in mask 1, D = 30 μm , T = 32 μm in mask 2, D = 15 μm , T = 16 μm in mask 3, D = 15 μm , T = 20 μm in mask 4. (c) Transverse profile of the losses and phase shift experienced by the electromagnetic field when reflected by the gain mirror around the Cr mask borderline. The Cr edge has less than 5 nm rising thickness. The phase shift of the mask is less than 2 π / 50 .

Fig. 2. Spatiotemporal behavior of the light emitted by the VECSEL with two hot-spots in the gain section (A and B ). (a), (b) Time-averaged near-field and far-field profiles of the VECSEL emission. (c) Bifurcation diagrams of the mode-locking emission from each hot-spot. These diagrams are obtained according to the following procedure: pump power P p is increased from zero up to the VECSEL threshold value (P p , th = 192.5 mA ), where an off solution becomes unstable at the advantage of mode-locked emission having N max pulses per round trip. Then, P p is decreased until the emission jumps to the emission having N max − 1 pulses per round trip. At this point, the stability of this solution is tested by increasing again P p up to P p , th and by decreasing it down to the point where the emission jumps to the solution with N max − 2 pulses per round trip. This is repeated for every solution with a number of pulses per round trip different from zero, until the system jumps to the off solution. The difference in the number N max of pulses per round trip for the two hot-spots is due to a non-perfectly homogeneous level of pumping of the two regions. (d), (e) Two different emission states obtained for the same parameter values in the multi-stable region (P p = 185 mW ). The blue (red) time trace represents the intensity emitted by hot-spot A (B ). In panel (d), we show the state (N A = 3 , N B = 4 ), while in panel (e), we show the state (N A = 6 , N B = 5 ). Space–time diagrams of these states, picturing the evolution of pulses emitted round trip after round trip, are represented in panels (f) (N A = 3 , N B = 4 ) and (g) (N A = 6 , N B = 5 ).

Fig. 3. Space–time diagram of the writing process of TLS in each hot-spot. (a) Writing of one LS in hot-spot A while hot-spot B is emitting three TLSs per round trip (N B = 3 ). The writing pump pulse is applied at round trip #10,000, and spot A emits a TLS that follows the timing of the perturbation pulse that is incidentally different from the round trip of the system. When the writing pulse is removed at round trip #15,000, the solution N A = 1 remains stable. (b) Writing of one TLS in the hot-spot B while hot-spot A is emitting N A = 2 TLSs per round trip. In the inset, we show the time-averaged near-field emission of the VECSEL during application of the perturbation to hot-spot B . The waist of the perturbation beam can be compared with the interference fringes.

Fig. 4. (a) Evolution of the TLS emitted by hot-spots A (red trace) and B (blue trace) in presence of two continuous wave (CW) 7-μm-waist pump beams targeting hot-spots A and B . Their powers P A and P B can be controlled independently. Here P A = 35 mW and P B = 45 mW . Both narrow waist pump beams are superimposed to the homogeneous pump beam, which is kept to a power P p = 120 mW . Inset: near-field time-averaged emission of the VECSEL showing the presence of the two 7-μm-waist independent pumps targeting hot-spots A and B . (b) Power spectra of the two outputs from hot-spots A (red trace) and B (blue trace).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address