• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 5, 0510001 (2018)
Yanchun Yang*, Jiao Li, Jianwu Dang, and Yangping Wang
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.0510001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yanchun Yang, Jiao Li, Jianwu Dang, Yangping Wang. Multi-Focus Image Fusion Based on Guided Filtering and Improved PCNN[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(5): 0510001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Simplified model of PCNN
    Fig. 1. Simplified model of PCNN
    Diagram of the proposed method
    Fig. 2. Diagram of the proposed method
    Variation of evaluation parameters with different values of parameters r1 and r2. (a) r1 (AG, STD and MI); (b) r2 (AG, STD and MI); (c) r1 (QAB/F); (d) r2(QAB/F); (e) r1 (QSF); (f) r2 (QSF)
    Fig. 3. Variation of evaluation parameters with different values of parameters r1 and r2. (a) r1 (AG, STD and MI); (b) r2 (AG, STD and MI); (c) r1 (QAB/F); (d) r2(QAB/F); (e) r1 (QSF); (f) r2 (QSF)
    Variation of evaluation parameters with different values of parameters ε1 and ε2. (a) ε1 (AG, STD and MI); (b) ε2 (AG, STD and MI); (c) ε1 (QAB/F); (d) ε2 (QAB/F); (e) ε1 (QSF); (f) ε2 (QSF)
    Fig. 4. Variation of evaluation parameters with different values of parameters ε1 and ε2. (a) ε1 (AG, STD and MI); (b) ε2 (AG, STD and MI); (c) ε1 (QAB/F); (d) ε2 (QAB/F); (e) ε1 (QSF); (f) ε2 (QSF)
    Variation of evaluation parameters with different number of decomposition levels. (a) AG, STD and MI; (b) QAB/F; (c) QSF
    Fig. 5. Variation of evaluation parameters with different number of decomposition levels. (a) AG, STD and MI; (b) QAB/F; (c) QSF
    Experimental results of the first group. (a) Source image A; (b) source image B; (c) PCA; (d) PCNN; (e) GIF; (f) GFF; (g) Multi-GFF; (h) proposed method
    Fig. 6. Experimental results of the first group. (a) Source image A; (b) source image B; (c) PCA; (d) PCNN; (e) GIF; (f) GFF; (g) Multi-GFF; (h) proposed method
    Experimental results of the second group. (a) Source image A; (b) source image B; (c) PCA; (d) PCNN; (e) GIF; (f) GFF; (g) Multi-GFF; (h) proposed method
    Fig. 7. Experimental results of the second group. (a) Source image A; (b) source image B; (c) PCA; (d) PCNN; (e) GIF; (f) GFF; (g) Multi-GFF; (h) proposed method
    MethodAGSTDMIQAB/FQSFRuntime /s
    PCA3.872 145.454 16.905 20.578 7-0.415 51.588 993
    PCNN4.249 747.451 87.292 60.566 5-0.336 0154.428 742
    GIF6.173 247.839 98.502 30.756 5-0.030 10.575 328
    GFF6.154 747.639 47.917 50.715 5-0.032 71.037 871
    Multi-GFF6.118 847.474 27.887 60.713 5-0.037 41.504 174
    Proposed method6.226 147.835 58.541 10.758 2-0.021 58.400 050
    Table 1. Objective evaluation results of the first group of multi-focus image fusion
    MethodAGSTDMIQAB/FQSFRuntime /s
    PCA4.250 028.961 57.701 00.725 8-0.346 80.486 788
    PCNN4.326 329.098 27.643 90.707 6-0.326 815.192 404
    GIF5.279 230.658 59.066 90.753 6-0.082 40.614 125
    GFF5.371 630.619 47.885 70.751 1-0.069 10.594 314
    Multi-GFF5.348 730.591 87.896 30.752 5-0.073 90.395 003
    Proposed method5.523 330.875 58.682 50.762 9-0.059 00.762 702
    Table 2. Objective evaluation results of the second group of multi-focus image fusion
    Yanchun Yang, Jiao Li, Jianwu Dang, Yangping Wang. Multi-Focus Image Fusion Based on Guided Filtering and Improved PCNN[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(5): 0510001
    Download Citation