Author Affiliations
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Simplified model of PCNN
Fig. 2. Diagram of the proposed method
Fig. 3. Variation of evaluation parameters with different values of parameters r1 and r2. (a) r1 (AG, STD and MI); (b) r2 (AG, STD and MI); (c) r1 (QAB/F); (d) r2(QAB/F); (e) r1 (QSF); (f) r2 (QSF)
Fig. 4. Variation of evaluation parameters with different values of parameters ε1 and ε2. (a) ε1 (AG, STD and MI); (b) ε2 (AG, STD and MI); (c) ε1 (QAB/F); (d) ε2 (QAB/F); (e) ε1 (QSF); (f) ε2 (QSF)
Fig. 5. Variation of evaluation parameters with different number of decomposition levels. (a) AG, STD and MI; (b) QAB/F; (c) QSF
Fig. 6. Experimental results of the first group. (a) Source image A; (b) source image B; (c) PCA; (d) PCNN; (e) GIF; (f) GFF; (g) Multi-GFF; (h) proposed method
Fig. 7. Experimental results of the second group. (a) Source image A; (b) source image B; (c) PCA; (d) PCNN; (e) GIF; (f) GFF; (g) Multi-GFF; (h) proposed method
Method | AG | STD | MI | QAB/F | QSF | Runtime /s |
---|
PCA | 3.872 1 | 45.454 1 | 6.905 2 | 0.578 7 | -0.415 5 | 1.588 993 | PCNN | 4.249 7 | 47.451 8 | 7.292 6 | 0.566 5 | -0.336 0 | 154.428 742 | GIF | 6.173 2 | 47.839 9 | 8.502 3 | 0.756 5 | -0.030 1 | 0.575 328 | GFF | 6.154 7 | 47.639 4 | 7.917 5 | 0.715 5 | -0.032 7 | 1.037 871 | Multi-GFF | 6.118 8 | 47.474 2 | 7.887 6 | 0.713 5 | -0.037 4 | 1.504 174 | Proposed method | 6.226 1 | 47.835 5 | 8.541 1 | 0.758 2 | -0.021 5 | 8.400 050 |
|
Table 1. Objective evaluation results of the first group of multi-focus image fusion
Method | AG | STD | MI | QAB/F | QSF | Runtime /s |
---|
PCA | 4.250 0 | 28.961 5 | 7.701 0 | 0.725 8 | -0.346 8 | 0.486 788 | PCNN | 4.326 3 | 29.098 2 | 7.643 9 | 0.707 6 | -0.326 8 | 15.192 404 | GIF | 5.279 2 | 30.658 5 | 9.066 9 | 0.753 6 | -0.082 4 | 0.614 125 | GFF | 5.371 6 | 30.619 4 | 7.885 7 | 0.751 1 | -0.069 1 | 0.594 314 | Multi-GFF | 5.348 7 | 30.591 8 | 7.896 3 | 0.752 5 | -0.073 9 | 0.395 003 | Proposed method | 5.523 3 | 30.875 5 | 8.682 5 | 0.762 9 | -0.059 0 | 0.762 702 |
|
Table 2. Objective evaluation results of the second group of multi-focus image fusion