• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 2, 0210018 (2021)
Haicheng Qu*, Bowen Tang*, and Guisen Yuan*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Software, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, Liaoning 125105, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0210018 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Haicheng Qu, Bowen Tang, Guisen Yuan. Improved Super-Resolution Image Reconstruction Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(2): 0210018 Copy Citation Text show less
    Overall structure of the SRCNN
    Fig. 1. Overall structure of the SRCNN
    Structure of the deconvolution
    Fig. 2. Structure of the deconvolution
    Improved SRCNN structure
    Fig. 3. Improved SRCNN structure
    Residual network
    Fig. 4. Residual network
    Improved residual network
    Fig. 5. Improved residual network
    Reconstruction effects of different algorithms. (a) Bicubic; (b) SRCNN; (c) FSRCNN; (d) our algorithm
    Fig. 6. Reconstruction effects of different algorithms. (a) Bicubic; (b) SRCNN; (c) FSRCNN; (d) our algorithm
    Reconstruction effect of the actual acquired image. (a) Low-resolution images; (b) our algorithm; (c) high-resolution images
    Fig. 7. Reconstruction effect of the actual acquired image. (a) Low-resolution images; (b) our algorithm; (c) high-resolution images
    AlgorithmBabyBirdButterflyHeadWoman
    Bicubic27.2835.31247.3334.7593.45
    SRCNN21.9723.78134.3330.8665.77
    FSRCNN22.4123.60127.4330.5362.93
    RD-SRCNN21.0917.6986.4428.7949.95
    Table 1. MSE of different algorithms
    AlgorithmBabyBirdButterflyHeadWoman
    Bicubic0.900.920.820.800.88
    SRCNN0.910.940.870.810.91
    FSRCNN0.910.950.880.820.91
    RD-SRCNN0.920.960.920.830.93
    Table 2. SSIM of different algorithms
    AlgorithmBabyBirdButterflyHeadWoman
    Bicubic33.7732.6524.1932.7228.42
    SRCNN34.7134.2126.5433.2329.95
    FSRCNN34.7234.4027.0733.2830.14
    RD-SRCNN34.8835.6528.7633.5431.15
    Table 3. Reconstruction effects of different algorithms unit: dB
    Evaluation indicatorActivation functionBabyBirdButterflyHeadWoman
    MSEELU21.3123.12123.5130.2958.82
    ReLU22.4123.60127.4330.5362.93
    SSIMELU0.910.940.890.820.92
    ReLU0.910.940.880.810.91
    PSNR /dBELU34.8434.4927.2133.3230.43
    ReLU34.6234.4027.0733.2830.14
    Table 4. Comparison of different activation functions in the 5-layer network structure
    Evaluation indicatorActivation functionBabyBirdButterflyHeadWoman
    MSEELU21.2321.18106.7429.2756.26
    ReLU22.3321.86113.6729.8056.43
    SSIMELU0.920.950.900.830.92
    ReLU0.910.940.890.820.92
    PSNR /dBELU34.8434.9227.8433.4630.62
    ReLU34.7334.8627.5733.3930.61
    Table 5. Comparison of different activation functions in the 8-layer network structure
    Evaluation indicatorResidual structureBabyBirdButterflyHeadWoman
    MSEyes21.1618.1887.0529.3550.17
    no21.3123.12123.5730.2958.82
    SSIMyes0.920.950.920.830.93
    no0.910.940.890.820.92
    PSNR /dByes34.8835.5328.7333.4531.13
    no34.8434.4927.2133.3230.43
    Table 6. ELU activation function performance in 5-layer network structure
    Evaluation indicatorResidual structureBabyBirdButterflyHeadWoman
    MSEyes21.1618.1886.4429.3549.95
    no21.5320.38105.4329.5556.27
    SSIMyes0.920.960.920.830.93
    no0.910.950.900.820.92
    PSNR /dByes34.8835.6528.7633.5431.15
    no34.7935.0327.933.4230.62
    Table 7. ELU activation function performance in 8-layer network structure
    Evaluation indicatorDeconvolutionBabyBirdButterflyHeadWoman
    MSEyes21.0917.6986.4428.7949.95
    no21.1618.1887.0529.3550.17
    SSIMyes0.920.960.920.830.93
    no0.920.950.920.830.93
    PSNR /dByes34.8835.6528.7633.5431.15
    no34.8835.5328.7333.4531.13
    Table 8. Performance indicators of deconvolution and non-deconvolution
    MethodTimes /sMethodTime /s
    Eight layers with no residual31.6385- layer network11.863
    Eight layers with residual30.0718-layer network8.152
    Table 9. Comparison of training time
    Haicheng Qu, Bowen Tang, Guisen Yuan. Improved Super-Resolution Image Reconstruction Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(2): 0210018
    Download Citation