Author Affiliations
1CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co., LTD., Qingdao, Shandong 266111, China2State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China3Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Special Welding Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai, Weihai, Shandong 264209, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Aluminum extrusions. (a) Appearances; (b) welds
Fig. 2. Laser-MIG hybrid welding processing
Fig. 3. Angle settings of the heat source in six tests. (a) Test 1; (b) test 2; (c) test 3; (d) test 4; (e) test 5; (f) test 6
Fig. 4. Weld appearances and cross-sections under different angle settings. (a) Test 1, α=82.5°,β=120°;(b) test 2, α=82.5°,β=140°;(c) test 3, α=70°,β=140°;(d) test 4, α=97.5°,β=120°;(e) test 5, α=97.5°,β=140°; (f) test 6, α=110°,β=140°
Fig. 5. Weld depth and width under different angle settings
Fig. 6. Steps for calculating weld porosity. (a) Cross-sections; (b) gray level image; (c) threshold segmentation
Fig. 7. Cross-sections and binary images of welds under different angle settings. (a) Test 1, α=82.5°,β=120°;(b) test 2, α=82.5°,β=140°;(c) test 3, α=70°,β=140°;(d) test 4, α=97.5°,β=120°;(e) test 5, α=97.5°,β= 140°;(f) test 6, α=110°,β=140°
Fig. 8. Porosity of welds under different angle settings
Fig. 9. Electricity signals, metal transfer and weld pool of welds under different angle settings. (a) Test 1, α=82.5°,β=120°;(b) test 2, α=82.5°,β=140°;(c) test 2, α=70°,β=140°;(d) test 4, α=97.5°,β=120°;(e) test 5, α= 97.5°,β=140°;(f) test 6, α=110°,β=140°
Fig. 10. Fluent finite element simulation analysis modeling process. (a) Welding model; (b) meshing; (c) droplet settings
Fig. 11. Simulation results of the cross-sections and weld pool of welds under different angle settings. (a) Test 1, α=82.5°,β=120°;(b) test 2, α=82.5°,β=140°;(c) test 3, α=70°,β=140°;(d) test 4, α=97.5°,β=120°; (e) test 5, α=97.5°,β=140°;(f) test 6, α=110°,β=140°
Fig. 12. Comparison of simulation results and measured results of the weld depth and width. (a) Weld width; (b) weld depth
Materials | Si | Mn | Mg | Zn | Fe | Cr | Ti | Al |
---|
6A01 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.08 | Balance | ER5356 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 5.50 | 0.10 | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.20 | Balance |
|
Table 1. Chemical composition of used materials (mass fraction, %)
Welding parameters | Value |
---|
Laser power /kW | 4 | Welding speed /(m·min-1) | 1.8 | Welding current /A | 180 | Welding voltage /V | 23 | Wire feeding speed /(m·min-1) | 8.1 | Distance between laser and arc /mm | 2 | Protect gas flow rate /(L·min-1) | 20 |
|
Table 2. Processing parameters of laser-MIG hybrid welding