• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 37, Issue 11, 1115004 (2017)
Xinjun Peng*, Jun Han, Yong Tang, Yuzhi Shang, and Yujin Yu
Author Affiliations
  • School of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201737.1115004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xinjun Peng, Jun Han, Yong Tang, Yuzhi Shang, Yujin Yu. Anti-Noise Stereo Matching Algorithm Based on Improved Census Transform and Outlier Elimination[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(11): 1115004 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Adaptive window with noise; (b) part of the Teddy map added with 0.05% salt and pepper noise; (c) disparity map computed by traditional cross-based cost aggregation algorithm; (d) disparity map computed by proposed cost aggregation algorithm
    Fig. 1. (a) Adaptive window with noise; (b) part of the Teddy map added with 0.05% salt and pepper noise; (c) disparity map computed by traditional cross-based cost aggregation algorithm; (d) disparity map computed by proposed cost aggregation algorithm
    (a) Arm length of pixel p in different directions; (b) aggregation region S of the pixel p
    Fig. 2. (a) Arm length of pixel p in different directions; (b) aggregation region S of the pixel p
    Influence of α and β on error matching rate in non-occlusion region. (a) α values; (b) β values
    Fig. 3. Influence of α and β on error matching rate in non-occlusion region. (a) α values; (b) β values
    Error matching rate of different algorithms under different noises. (a) Salt and pepper noise; (b) Gaussian noise
    Fig. 4. Error matching rate of different algorithms under different noises. (a) Salt and pepper noise; (b) Gaussian noise
    Experimental results of the benchmark images. (a) Middlebury benchmark images; (b) Middlebury benchmark disparity maps; (c) disparity maps with proposed algorithm; (d) error maps with proposed algorithm
    Fig. 5. Experimental results of the benchmark images. (a) Middlebury benchmark images; (b) Middlebury benchmark disparity maps; (c) disparity maps with proposed algorithm; (d) error maps with proposed algorithm
    Experimental results of the benchmark images. (a) Middlebury benchmark images; (b) Middlebury benchmark disparity maps; (c) disparity maps with proposed algorithm
    Fig. 6. Experimental results of the benchmark images. (a) Middlebury benchmark images; (b) Middlebury benchmark disparity maps; (c) disparity maps with proposed algorithm
    AlgorithmNoiseless2% noise5% noise10% noise15% noise
    Mei’s aggregation4.546.6711.7326.8848.63
    Proposed4.154.927.0416.4137.15
    Table 1. Average error matching rate in non-occlusion region%
    AlgorithmNoiselessSalt and pepper noiseGaussian noise
    2%5%10%15%Variance of 5Variance of 10Variance of 15Variance of 20
    CT3.243.655.5620.7352.416.4130.9845.2553.61
    AverageCT4.546.1712.6730.4349.018.4828.1441.1249.60
    Min-CT5.678.3413.3928.3354.9511.7933.6848.2557.49
    Proposed3.573.985.1410.4824.576.9828.8740.8748.94
    Table 2. Average error matching rate of different algorithms in non-occlusion region%
    AlgorithmNoiselessSalt and pepper noiseGaussian noise
    50 dB45 dB40 dB35 dB30 dB50 dB45 dB40 dB35 dB30 dB
    CT96.7696.5596.0294.4447.5919.8895.5893.7991.2787.5754.75
    AverageCT95.4694.2491.8887.3350.9921.7794.4892.7289.5583.1358.88
    Min-CT94.3393.1191.1786.6145.0515.9191.1188.8785.6377.1141.75
    Proposed96.4396.1795.8794.8675.4329.0595.4793.6191.3287.7459.13
    Table 3. Average matching accuracy with different PSNR values in non-occlusion area%
    AlgorithmTsukubaVenusTeddyConesAvg
    n-occalldiscn-occalldiscn-occalldiscn-occalldisc
    Proposed2.042.5410.790.230.863.065.9610.5713.462.266.959.755.71
    RandomVote4.585.5417.700.130.451.865.409.5414.802.627.937.546.53
    EnhencedBP0.941.745.050.350.864.348.1113.3018.505.0911.1011.006.69
    FBS2.382.8010.400.340.924.459.8315.3020.303.109.318.597.92
    RTCensus5.086.2519.2015.802.4214.207.9613.8020.304.109.5412.209.73
    RinCensus4.786.0014.401.111.767.919.7917.3026.108.0916.2017.6010.90
    Table 4. Error matching rate of different algorithms when the threshold is 1%
    Xinjun Peng, Jun Han, Yong Tang, Yuzhi Shang, Yujin Yu. Anti-Noise Stereo Matching Algorithm Based on Improved Census Transform and Outlier Elimination[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(11): 1115004
    Download Citation