Author Affiliations
1Liangjiang International College, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 401135, China2College of Science, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China3Liangjiang Artificial Intelligence College, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 401135, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the anti-interference experiment setup of the LFH LiDAR
Fig. 2. Time-frequency diagram of modulation signal of the LFH LiDAR. (a) Principle of the LFH; (b) LFH LiDAR signal
Fig. 3. Ranging result of the LFH LiDAR
Fig. 4. Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with same type interference. (a) β=1,M=1; (b) β=1,M=3; (c) β=4, M=2
Fig. 5. Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with pulse LiDAR interference. (a) β=1,M=1; (b) β=1,M=3; (c) β=4,M=2
Fig. 6. Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with FMCW LiDAR interference. (a) β=1,M=1; (b) β=1,M=3; (c) β=4,M=2
Fig. 7. Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with CW LiDAR interference. (a) β=1, M=1; (b) β=1, M=3; (c) β=4, M=2
Fig. 8. Experiment of interference. (a) 16-lines commercial pulse LiDAR; (b) low noise and tunable FMCW LiDAR; (c) experiment setup
Specification | Value |
---|
Range /m | 20 | Points of frequency-hopping | 10000 | Bandwidth of frequency-hopping /GHz | 10 | Residence time per hop /μs | 1 | Spacing of frequency-hopping /MHz | 1 | Hopping period /ms | 10 |
|
Table 1. Simulation specifications of the LFH LiDAR
Interference type | No.1 /m | No.2 /m | No.3 /m | No.4 /m | No.5 /m | No.6 /m | /% |
---|
R | M | R | M | R | M | R | M | R | M | R | M |
---|
CW(25 MHz) | 1.99 | 1.98 | 2.27 | 2.28 | 3.15 | 3.14 | 3.50 | 3.51 | 2.99 | 3.00 | 2.70 | 2.72 | ±0.8 | CW(50 MHz) | 1.99 | 1.99 | 2.27 | 2.29 | 3.15 | 3.13 | 3.50 | 3.51 | 2.99 | 3.00 | 2.70 | 2.71 | ±0.9 | CW(75 MHz) | 1.99 | 1.98 | 2.27 | 2.27 | 3.15 | 3.15 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2.99 | 3.00 | 2.70 | 2.72 | ±0.7 | Pulse | 1.99 | 1.98 | 2.27 | 2.28 | 3.15 | 3.14 | 3.50 | 3.51 | 2.99 | 3.01 | 2.70 | 2.71 | ±0.7 | FMCW | 1.99 | 1.98 | 2.27 | 2.28 | 3.15 | 3.15 | 3.50 | 3.52 | 2.99 | 3.01 | 2.70 | 2.72 | ±0.7 | LFH | 1.57 | 1.56 | 2.27 | 2.27 | 2.48 | 2.46 | 3.50 | 3.51 | 2.99 | 3.00 | 2.70 | 2.74 | ±1.5 |
|
Table 2. Measuring results of six different distance with different interference sources and the relative error of distance measuring