• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 13, 1328003 (2022)
Yonglong Chen1, Yingke Xie2、*, Hengheng Liang3, Xinghong Zhang1, and Cheng Liu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Liangjiang International College, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 401135, China
  • 2College of Science, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China
  • 3Liangjiang Artificial Intelligence College, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 401135, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1328003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yonglong Chen, Yingke Xie, Hengheng Liang, Xinghong Zhang, Cheng Liu. Investigation of Light Frequency-Hopping LiDAR and Its Anti-Interference Performance[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(13): 1328003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of the anti-interference experiment setup of the LFH LiDAR
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the anti-interference experiment setup of the LFH LiDAR
    Time-frequency diagram of modulation signal of the LFH LiDAR. (a) Principle of the LFH; (b) LFH LiDAR signal
    Fig. 2. Time-frequency diagram of modulation signal of the LFH LiDAR. (a) Principle of the LFH; (b) LFH LiDAR signal
    Ranging result of the LFH LiDAR
    Fig. 3. Ranging result of the LFH LiDAR
    Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with same type interference. (a) β=1,M=1; (b) β=1,M=3; (c) β=4, M=2
    Fig. 4. Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with same type interference. (a) β=1,M=1; (b) β=1,M=3; (c) β=4, M=2
    Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with pulse LiDAR interference. (a) β=1,M=1; (b) β=1,M=3; (c) β=4,M=2
    Fig. 5. Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with pulse LiDAR interference. (a) β=1,M=1; (b) β=1,M=3; (c) β=4,M=2
    Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with FMCW LiDAR interference. (a) β=1,M=1; (b) β=1,M=3; (c) β=4,M=2
    Fig. 6. Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with FMCW LiDAR interference. (a) β=1,M=1; (b) β=1,M=3; (c) β=4,M=2
    Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with CW LiDAR interference. (a) β=1, M=1; (b) β=1, M=3; (c) β=4, M=2
    Fig. 7. Ranging results of LFH LiDAR with CW LiDAR interference. (a) β=1, M=1; (b) β=1, M=3; (c) β=4, M=2
    Experiment of interference. (a) 16-lines commercial pulse LiDAR; (b) low noise and tunable FMCW LiDAR; (c) experiment setup
    Fig. 8. Experiment of interference. (a) 16-lines commercial pulse LiDAR; (b) low noise and tunable FMCW LiDAR; (c) experiment setup
    SpecificationValue
    Range /m20
    Points of frequency-hopping10000
    Bandwidth of frequency-hopping /GHz10
    Residence time per hop /μs1
    Spacing of frequency-hopping /MHz1
    Hopping period /ms10
    Table 1. Simulation specifications of the LFH LiDAR
    Interference typeNo.1 /mNo.2 /mNo.3 /mNo.4 /mNo.5 /mNo.6 /mδ /%
    RMRMRMRMRMRM
    CW(25 MHz)1.991.982.272.283.153.143.503.512.993.002.702.72±0.8
    CW(50 MHz)1.991.992.272.293.153.133.503.512.993.002.702.71±0.9
    CW(75 MHz)1.991.982.272.273.153.153.503.502.993.002.702.72±0.7
    Pulse1.991.982.272.283.153.143.503.512.993.012.702.71±0.7
    FMCW1.991.982.272.283.153.153.503.522.993.012.702.72±0.7
    LFH1.571.562.272.272.482.463.503.512.993.002.702.74±1.5
    Table 2. Measuring results of six different distance with different interference sources and the relative error of distance measuring
    Yonglong Chen, Yingke Xie, Hengheng Liang, Xinghong Zhang, Cheng Liu. Investigation of Light Frequency-Hopping LiDAR and Its Anti-Interference Performance[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(13): 1328003
    Download Citation