Yuhan Zhang1,2,3, Miaohua Huang1,2,3,*, Gengyao Chen1,2,3, Yanzhou Li1,2,3, and Yiming Wu1,2,3
Author Affiliations
1Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei , China2Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Components Technology, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei , China3Hubei Research Center for New Energy & Intelligent Connected Vehicle, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei , Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Algorithm overall framework diagram
Fig. 2. 3D position encoding process
Fig. 3. Perceptual ability of queries for other queries from different distances
Fig. 4. Temporal feature sampling process
Fig. 5. Visualization of baseline model predictions
Fig. 6. Visualization of improved model predictions
Algorithm | Modality | NDS | mAP | mATE | mASE | mAOE | mAVE | mAAE | FPS |
---|
DETR3D | C | 0.434 | 0.349 | 0.716 | 0.268 | 0.379 | 0.842 | 0.200 | 3.7 | BEVDet | C | 0.417 | 0.349 | 0.637 | 0.269 | 0.490 | 0.914 | 0.268 | 16.7 | PETR | C | 0.441 | 0.366 | 0.717 | 0.267 | 0.412 | 0.834 | 0.190 | 5.7 | BEVFormer | C | 0.517 | 0.416 | 0.673 | 0.274 | 0.372 | 0.394 | 0.198 | 3.0 | BEVDepth | C | 0.535 | 0.412 | 0.565 | 0.266 | 0.358 | 0.331 | 0.190 | 4.5 | Proposed algorithm | C | 0.508 | 0.467 | 0.564 | 0.445 | 0.518 | 0.443 | 0.289 | 15.6 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of results of different algorithms on the nuScenes validation set
Algorithm | Modality | NDS | mAP | mATE | mASE | mAOE | mAVE | mAAE |
---|
PointPillar | L | 0.453 | 0.305 | | | | | | CenterPoint | L | 0.655 | 0.580 | | | | | | DETR3D | C | 0.479 | 0.412 | 0.641 | 0.255 | 0.394 | 0.845 | 0.133 | BEVDet | C | 0.488 | 0.424 | 0.524 | 0.242 | 0.373 | 0.950 | 0.148 | PETR | C | 0.504 | 0.441 | 0.593 | 0.249 | 0.383 | 0.808 | 0.132 | BEVFormer | C | 0.569 | 0.481 | 0.582 | 0.256 | 0.375 | 0.378 | 0.126 | BEVDepth | C | 0.609 | 0.520 | 0.445 | 0.243 | 0.352 | 0.347 | 0.127 | Proposed algorithm | C | 0.614 | 0.514 | 0.462 | 0.245 | 0.343 | 0.266 | 0.114 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of results of different algorithms on the nuScenes test set
Module | Setting | NDS | mAP |
---|
Query formulation | 3D reference point | 0.479 | 0.435 | Ours | 0.489 | 0.443 | 3DPE | None | 0.474 | 0.431 | Ours | 0.489 | 0.443 | MSSA | MHSA | 0.467 | 0.403 | Ours | 0.489 | 0.443 | TFFS | N=4/8/16 | 0.459/0.475/0.489 | 0.407/0.422/0.443 | T=1/4/8 | 0.401/0.462/0.489 | 0.358/0.415/0.443 |
|
Table 3. Impact of different modules on model performance