• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 42, Issue 8, 0806003 (2022)
Lei Liu1, Hui Chen2, and Yanjun Zhang1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Dynamic Testing Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan, Shanxi 0 30051, China
  • 2Beijing Institute of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing 100076, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202242.0806003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lei Liu, Hui Chen, Yanjun Zhang. Refractive Index Sensing Simulation Analysis of Four-Pole Suspended Core Fiber Based on Surface Plasmon Resonance[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(8): 0806003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagrams of structure and polishing cross-section of four-pole suspended core fiber. (a) Complete structure of fiber; (b) polishing cross section of one hole; (c) polishing cross section of two opposite holes; (d) polishing cross section of two adjacent holes
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagrams of structure and polishing cross-section of four-pole suspended core fiber. (a) Complete structure of fiber; (b) polishing cross section of one hole; (c) polishing cross section of two opposite holes; (d) polishing cross section of two adjacent holes
    Distributions of optical field E when liquid refractive index is 1.39. (a) x polarization (650 nm); (b) x polarization (720 nm); (c) x polarization (800 nm); (d) y polarization (650 nm); (e) y polarization (720nm); (f) y polarization (800 nm)
    Fig. 2. Distributions of optical field E when liquid refractive index is 1.39. (a) x polarization (650 nm); (b) x polarization (720 nm); (c) x polarization (800 nm); (d) y polarization (650 nm); (e) y polarization (720nm); (f) y polarization (800 nm)
    When analyte refractive index neff is 1.39, relationship among loss spectrum of core mode, effective refractive index of core mode, and effective refractive index of SPP mode
    Fig. 3. When analyte refractive index neff is 1.39, relationship among loss spectrum of core mode, effective refractive index of core mode, and effective refractive index of SPP mode
    Sensing characteristics when polishing one air hole. (a) Spectral loss corresponding to refractive indexes of different analytes; (b) relationship between refractive index and resonance wavelength
    Fig. 4. Sensing characteristics when polishing one air hole. (a) Spectral loss corresponding to refractive indexes of different analytes; (b) relationship between refractive index and resonance wavelength
    Sensing characteristics when polishing two opposite air holes. (a) Spectral loss corresponding to refractive indexes of different analytes; (b) relationship between refractive index and resonance wavelength
    Fig. 5. Sensing characteristics when polishing two opposite air holes. (a) Spectral loss corresponding to refractive indexes of different analytes; (b) relationship between refractive index and resonance wavelength
    Sensing characteristics when polishing two adjacent air holes. (a) Spectral loss corresponding to refractive indexes of different analytes; (b) relationship between refractive index and resonance wavelength
    Fig. 6. Sensing characteristics when polishing two adjacent air holes. (a) Spectral loss corresponding to refractive indexes of different analytes; (b) relationship between refractive index and resonance wavelength
    Influences of structural parameters on sensing characteristics when polishing one air hole. (a) Spectral loss under different gold film thicknesses;(b) spectral loss under different suspension pole thicknesses
    Fig. 7. Influences of structural parameters on sensing characteristics when polishing one air hole. (a) Spectral loss under different gold film thicknesses;(b) spectral loss under different suspension pole thicknesses
    Influences of structural parameters on sensing characteristics when polishing two opposite air holes. (a) Spectral loss under different gold film thicknesses; (b) spectral loss under different suspension pole thicknesses
    Fig. 8. Influences of structural parameters on sensing characteristics when polishing two opposite air holes. (a) Spectral loss under different gold film thicknesses; (b) spectral loss under different suspension pole thicknesses
    Influences of structural parameters on sensing characteristics when polishing two adjacent air holes. (a) Spectral loss under different gold film thicknesses; (b) spectral loss under different suspension pole thicknesses
    Fig. 9. Influences of structural parameters on sensing characteristics when polishing two adjacent air holes. (a) Spectral loss under different gold film thicknesses; (b) spectral loss under different suspension pole thicknesses
    ParameterValueParameterValue
    ε5.9673ΩL /THz2π×650.07
    ωD /THz2π×2113.6ΓL /THz2π×104.86
    γD /THz2π×15.92Δε1.09
    Table 1. Definition of each parameter value in Drude-Lorentz model
    Refractive indexWavelength /nmSensitivity /(nm·RIU-1)Resolution /(10-4 RIU)Refractive indexWavelength /nmSensitivity /(nm·RIU-1)Resolution /(10-5 RIU)
    1.315749001.101.3766024004.20
    1.3258310001.001.3868432003.10
    1.3359313000.771.3971644002.30
    1.3460615000.671.4076060001.70
    1.3562117000.591.4182090001.10
    1.3663822000.451.42910150000.67
    Table 2. Numerical analysis results when polishing one air hole
    Refractive indexWavelength /nmSensitivity /(nm·RIU-1)Resolution /(10-4 RIU)Refractive indexWavelength /nmSensitivity /(nm·RIU-1)Resolution /(10-5 RIU)
    1.3157010001.001.3766020005.00
    1.3258010001.001.3868040002.50
    1.3359015000.671.3972040002.50
    1.3460515000.671.4076070001.40
    1.3562020000.501.41830100001.00
    1.3664020000.501.42930160000.63
    Table 3. Numerical analysis results when polishing two opposite air holes
    Refractive indexWavelength /nmSensitivity /(nm·RIU-1)Resolution /(10-4 RIU)Refractive indexWavelength /nmSensitivity /(nm·RIU-1)Resolution /(10-5RIU)
    1.3159010001.01.3667030003.30
    1.3260010001.01.3770040002.50
    1.3361020000.51.3874060001.70
    1.3463020000.51.39800100001.00
    1.3565020000.51.40900200000.50
    Table 4. Numerical analysis results when polishing two adjacent air holes
    CharacteristicWavelength /μmRange of refractive indexMaximum spectral sensitivity /(nm·RIU-1)Maximum resolution /RIU
    Quasi-D-shape[6]550—7401.33—1.423877
    Double loss peaks[7]1.34—1.38189005.291×10-6
    Exposed-core grapefruit fiber and Bimetallic structure[8]1.33—1.4216400
    Four-hole grapefruit fiber[9]600—12001.33—1.4319000
    Our work570—9301.31—1.42200005.0×10-6
    Table 5. Performance comparison of sensors that have been reported
    Lei Liu, Hui Chen, Yanjun Zhang. Refractive Index Sensing Simulation Analysis of Four-Pole Suspended Core Fiber Based on Surface Plasmon Resonance[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(8): 0806003
    Download Citation