
- Opto-Electronic Advances
- Vol. 7, Issue 2, 230184-1 (2024)
Abstract
In summary, we have developed a nanoscale platform for generating and manipulating structured EVBs in free-space. By designing the generalized spiral phases and imparting them onto the incident free electrons, we experimentally demonstrate that EVBs can be engineered with different intensity patterns. Unlike classic vortices, the orbital motions of structured EVBs are not attributed to the collective behavior of many electrons, and no external field or force are necessary for the generation. Thanks to its additional controllable degree of freedom, the structured EVB as a quantum electron probe holds great potential in electron microscopy
where
In principle, a free-space EVB is formed by continuous phase distributions around the center singularity that can be evaluated as the loop integral of the phase gradient in the transverse plane
Figure 5.
Thus far, all the experimentally generated EVBs with integer topological charge exhibit isotropic doughnut intensity patterns. One approach to break the isotropy is to introduce a fractional topological charge
To better understand the physical picture of structured EVB, we further investigate the probability current density in quantum electron states, defined as
Figure 2.
Vortices widely exist on all scales in nature, such as gravitational vortices around black holes in universe, typhoon vortices on earth and quantum vortices in super-fluids. Among them, quantum vortices are particularly interesting because they can be represented by free movement of a single particle, which was first proposed by Allen et al. in 1992
Figure 4.
As another important elementary particle, electrons have drawn considerable attention in the fields from electron microscopy to nanofabrication. Different from massless neutral photons, electrons are massive charged particles and obey Fermi-Dirac statistics. In spite of this, electrons can still be represented by waves and free-electron wave functions. As a result, similar to photons, electrons are also able to be shaped to produce electron vortex beam (EVB) carrying OAM. In 2010, EVB was first generated by using spiral phase plates consisting of spontaneously stacked graphite thin films to impart OAM onto the incident electron beam
In addition to generation, we also investigate the coherent superposition of two structured EVBs with different topological charges of
Figure 3.
Figure 1.
In experiment, we fabricate binary holographic phase masks composed of nanoscale forked gratings to create the structured EVBs. The phase masks can be imprinted with desired phase shift by adjusting the thickness of electron-transparent material
When illuminated with free electrons, the phase masks can impart the predesigned phase front onto the electron wave packets at the first order of diffraction, which would form the structured EVBs in the far-field. These generated EVBs are captured at the focal plane of magnetic lens system in the TEM.
Methods
Sample preparation
In this work, the binary phase masks are fabricated on 100 nm-thick silicon nitride membranes by using focused-ion-beam (FIB) milling. The FIB tool utilizing Ga-ions is operated at acceleration voltage of 30 keV and beam current of 7.7 pA. The patterning is performed with a minimum step size of 4 nm and a dwell time of 0.42 ms.
TEM measurement
The evolution of electron vortex is observed in a Tecnai TF20 field emission gun TEM, which produces a coherent monoenergetic electron beam with an energy of 200 keV, corresponding to the relativistic de Broglie wavelength of approximately ~2.51 pm. The phase masks are placed at the front focal plane of the magnetic lens. When illuminated with coherent electron beam, the phase mask can shape the electron wave packets to form structured EVBs in the back focal plane of magnetic lens system. The diffraction patterns are recorded using low angle diffraction (LAD) mode, for which the magnetic lens is operated at low current. The LAD mode enables long camera length, so the diffractive angles for electrons <1 μrad can be measured. A charge-coupled device (CCD) camera is used to capture the propagation dynamics of the generated EVBs.
References
[1] L Allen, MW Beijersbergen, RJC Spreeuw et al. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys Rev A, 45, 8185-8189(1992).
[2] MB Pu, X Li, XL Ma et al. Catenary optics for achromatic generation of perfect optical angular momentum. Sci Adv, 1, e1500396(2015).
[3] YJ Shen, XJ Wang, ZW Xie et al. Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities. Light Sci Appl, 8, 90(2019).
[4] XY Fang, HR Ren, KY Li et al. Nanophotonic manipulation of optical angular momentum for high-dimensional information optics. Adv Opt Photonics, 13, 772-833(2021).
[5] YH Guo, SC Zhang, MB Pu et al. Spin-decoupled metasurface for simultaneous detection of spin and orbital angular momenta via momentum transformation. Light Sci Appl, 10, 63(2021).
[6] YX Zhang, XF Liu, H Lin et al. Ultrafast multi-target control of tightly focused light fields. Opto-Electron Adv, 5, 210026(2022).
[7] A Porfirev, S Khonina, A Ustinov et al. Vectorial spin-orbital Hall effect of light upon tight focusing and its experimental observation in azopolymer films. Opto-Electron Sci, 2, 230014(2023).
[8] L Paterson, MP MacDonald, J Arlt et al. Controlled rotation of optically trapped microscopic particles. Science, 292, 912-914(2001).
[9] DG Grier. A revolution in optical manipulation. Nature, 424, 810-816(2003).
[10] KI Willig, SO Rizzoli, V Westphal et al. STED-microscopy reveals that synaptotagmin remains clustered after synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Nature, 440, 935-939(2006).
[11] XG Luo. Principles of electromagnetic waves in metasurfaces. Sci China Phys, Mech Astron, 58, 594201(2015).
[12] A Nicolas, L Veissier, L Giner et al. A quantum memory for orbital angular momentum photonic qubits. Nat Photonics, 8, 234-238(2014).
[13] HR Ren, XP Li, QM Zhang et al. On-chip noninterference angular momentum multiplexing of broadband light. Science, 352, 805-809(2016).
[14] XY Fang, HR Ren, M Gu. Orbital angular momentum holography for high-security encryption. Nat Photonics, 14, 102-108(2020).
[15] M Uchida, A Tonomura. Generation of electron beams carrying orbital angular momentum. Nature, 464, 737-739(2010).
[16] J Verbeeck, H Tian, P Schattschneider. Production and application of electron vortex beams. Nature, 467, 301-304(2010).
[17] BJ McMorran, A Agrawal, IM Anderson et al. Electron vortex beams with high quanta of orbital angular momentum. Science, 331, 192-195(2011).
[18] V Grillo, GC Gazzadi, E Mafakheri et al. Holographic generation of highly twisted electron beams. Phys Rev Lett, 114, 034801(2015).
[19] XY Yuan, Q Xu, YH Lang et al. Tailoring spatiotemporal dynamics of plasmonic vortices. Opto-Electron Adv, 6, 220133(2023).
[20] TC Petersen, M Weyland, DM Paganin et al. Electron vortex production and control using aberration induced diffraction catastrophes. Phys Rev Lett, 110, 033901(2013).
[21] A Béché, Boxem R Van, Tendeloo G Van et al. Magnetic monopole field exposed by electrons. Nat Phys, 10, 26-29(2014).
[22] J Harris, V Grillo, E Mafakheri et al. Structured quantum waves. Nat Phys, 11, 629-634(2015).
[23] KY Bliokh, IP Ivanov, G Guzzinati et al. Theory and applications of free-electron vortex states. Phys Rep, 690, 1-70(2017).
[24] M Mousley, G Thirunavukkarasu, M Babiker et al. Robust and adjustable C-shaped electron vortex beams. New J Phys, 19, 063008(2017).
[25] YQ Yang, A Forbes, LC Cao. A review of liquid crystal spatial light modulators: devices and applications. Opto-Electron Sci, 2, 230026(2023).
[26] I Freund. Optical vortices in Gaussian random wave fields: statistical probability densities. J Opt Soc Am A, 11, 1644-1652(1994).
[27] I Freund, V Freilikher. Parameterization of anisotropic vortices. J Opt Soc Am A, 14, 1902-1910(1997).
[28] JF Nye, MV Berry. Dislocations in wave trains. Proc Roy Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci, 336, 165-190(1974).
[29] TR Harvey, JS Pierce, AK Agrawal et al. Efficient diffractive phase optics for electrons. New J Phys, 16, 093039(2014).
[30] V Grillo, E Karimi, GC Gazzadi et al. Generation of nondiffracting electron Bessel beams. Phys Rev X, 4, 011013(2014).
[31] A Polman, M Kociak, García de Abajo F Javier. Electron-beam spectroscopy for nanophotonics. Nat Mater, 18, 1158-1171(2019).
[32] RX Yu, PC Huo, MZ Liu et al. Generation of perfect electron vortex beam with a customized beam size independent of orbital angular momentum. Nano Lett, 23, 2436-2441(2023).
[33] J Verbeeck, T He, Tendeloo G Van. How to manipulate nanoparticles with an electron beam. Adv Mater, 25, 1114-1117(2013).
[34] S Lloyd, M Babiker, J Yuan. Quantized orbital angular momentum transfer and magnetic dichroism in the interaction of electron vortices with matter. Phys Rev Lett, 108, 074802(2012).
[35] D Ugarte, C Ducati. Controlling multipolar surface Plasmon excitation through the azimuthal phase structure of electron vortex beams. Phys Rev B, 93, 205418(2016).
[36] G Guzzinati, A Béché, H Lourenço-Martins et al. Probing the symmetry of the potential of localized surface plasmon resonances with phase-shaped electron beams. Nat Commun, 8, 14999(2017).
[37] CW Clark, R Barankov, MG Huber et al. Controlling neutron orbital angular momentum. Nature, 525, 504-506(2015).
[38] I Madan, GM Vanacore, S Gargiulo et al. The quantum future of microscopy: wave function engineering of electrons, ions, and nuclei. Appl Phys Lett, 116, 230502(2020).
[39] VE Lembessis, D Ellinas, M Babiker et al. Atom vortex beams. Phys Rev A, 89, 053616(2014).
[40] A Luski, Y Segev, R David et al. Vortex beams of atoms and molecules. Science, 373, 1105-1109(2021).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address