• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 52, Issue 5, 20220537 (2023)
Ting Yu, Chunhui Niu, and Yong Lv*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Instrument Science and Photoelectric Engineering, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20220537 Cite this Article
    Ting Yu, Chunhui Niu, Yong Lv. "Cat's eye" echo information assessment method of CCD damage status[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(5): 20220537 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Basic structure of CCD; (b) Damage status of CCD; (c) Marked area, 3D topography image of CCD; (d) Undamaged area; (e) Damaged area
    Fig. 1. (a) Basic structure of CCD; (b) Damage status of CCD; (c) Marked area, 3D topography image of CCD; (d) Undamaged area; (e) Damaged area
    (a) Schematic diagram of optical system platform for simultaneous polariztion imaging; (b) Experimental scene, system device (c) Transmitting and receiving system; (d) Detection system
    Fig. 2. (a) Schematic diagram of optical system platform for simultaneous polariztion imaging; (b) Experimental scene, system device (c) Transmitting and receiving system; (d) Detection system
    I and DP of CCD. (a) Raw data; (b) Processed data
    Fig. 3. I and DP of CCD. (a) Raw data; (b) Processed data
    Relationship between smoothing fator and error rate平滑因子与错误率的关系
    Fig. 4. Relationship between smoothing fator and error rate 平滑因子 与错误率的关系
    Predition effect of long-distance outdoor models. (a) KNN; (b) K-SVM; (c) PNN
    Fig. 5. Predition effect of long-distance outdoor models. (a) KNN; (b) K-SVM; (c) PNN
    Long-distance predition effect of different random numbers. (a) Error rate; (b) Predition time
    Fig. 6. Long-distance predition effect of different random numbers. (a) Error rate; (b) Predition time
    GroupUndamaged area Sq/μm Damaged area Sq/μm
    13.9316.357
    24.1146.522
    34.1155.705
    44.0745.191
    54.0996.033
    64.1425.643
    Table 1. RMS parameter Sq of CCD surface
    IDPCategory label
    3090980.1128961
    3208100.1022601
    2840510.0957121
    2966610.1457721
    2917960.0840861
    3879320.3783912
    370 9130.3165622
    392 9110.3852402
    3965140.3362552
    3961260.3878062
    Table 2. Input data format of model
    Smoothing fatorError rate
    0.19.8639%
    0.223.1293%
    0.342.8571%
    0.444.5578%
    0.544.5578%
    Table 3. Error rates for different smoothing fators \begin{document}$ \sigma $\end{document}
    Different dataMehodNumber of errors/PSCError ratePredition time/ms
    Near-distance experimentKNN52.13678%0.081
    K-SVM62.73506%0.101
    PNN52.13678%0.169
    Long-distance experimentKNN3511.9728%0.044
    K-SVM217.27888%0.067
    PNN289.65986%0.161
    Mixed dataKNN6612.42424%3.377
    K-SVM7313.86364%4.273
    PNN5710.7197%7.751
    Table 4. Average of five random numbers in different data
    Ting Yu, Chunhui Niu, Yong Lv. "Cat's eye" echo information assessment method of CCD damage status[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(5): 20220537
    Download Citation