• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 51, Issue 6, 0612002 (2022)
Lianbo FU1、2, Jianjun LIU1、2、*, Xin REN1、2, Wei YAN1、2, Deqing KONG1、2, Wangli CHEN1, Hai HUANG1、2, and Xingye GAO1
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Astronomical Observatories,Key Laboratory of Lunar and Deep Space Exploration,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Science,Beijing 100049,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20225106.0612002 Cite this Article
    Lianbo FU, Jianjun LIU, Xin REN, Wei YAN, Deqing KONG, Wangli CHEN, Hai HUANG, Xingye GAO. Rapid Inspection Method and Accuracy Analysis of Large Antenna Panel Deformation[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51(6): 0612002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Antenna panel structure schematic
    Fig. 1. Antenna panel structure schematic
    Antenna panel point cloud acquisition
    Fig. 2. Antenna panel point cloud acquisition
    Three-dimensional coordinate measurement schematic
    Fig. 3. Three-dimensional coordinate measurement schematic
    Faro 3D laser scanner
    Fig. 4. Faro 3D laser scanner
    Wuqing 70 m antenna panel deformation monitoring schematic
    Fig. 5. Wuqing 70 m antenna panel deformation monitoring schematic
    Smooth surface panel
    Fig. 6. Smooth surface panel
    Target ball layout
    Fig. 7. Target ball layout
    Point cloud data alignment effect
    Fig. 8. Point cloud data alignment effect
    Comparison of point cloud data before and after filtering
    Fig. 9. Comparison of point cloud data before and after filtering
    Overall deformation analysis
    Fig. 10. Overall deformation analysis
    d/mMaximum/mmMinimum/mmAverage valueStandard deviation/mm
    101.1200.080.18
    202.6600.030.22
    301.1500.010.27
    Table 1. Deviation analysis of multiple measurements of horizontal panels
    X coordinate standard deviation/mmY coordinate standard deviation/mmZ coordinate standard deviation/mm

    Distance standard

    Deviation/mm

    Target ball 10.160.160.120.18
    Target ball 20.200.150.150.13
    Target ball 30.200.150.150.13
    Target ball 40.240.230.130.11
    Target ball 50.250.270.490.18
    Target ball 60.570.340.880.21
    Table 2. Analysis of measurement error of target ball position at different distances
    Distance between target ballsMaximum value/mmMinimum value/mmAverage value/mmStandard deviation
    1 and 21.640.941.340.25
    3 and 40.93-0.574.3×10-40.50
    5 and 60.96-0.74-1.4×10-40.54
    Table 3. Target ball relative distance measurement error analysis
    Measurement methodMeasurement accuracy and efficiency
    Longitudinal methodAntenna area 600 m2,acquisition time 4 hours,measurement efficiency is 40.00 min/100 m2,accuracy 0.5 mm 3
    Photogrammetric measurementsMiyu 50 m antenna,1 960 m2,1 hour date acquisition,9 hours processing,measurement efficiency 30.61 minutes/100 m2,accuracy 0.4 mm5
    Radio holography13.7 m antenna,147 m2 area,2.5 hours date acquisition,acquisition efficiency 102.04 min/100 m2,accuracy 0.16 mm5
    3D laser scanner method70 m antenna,3 840 m2 area,1 hour of date acquisition and processing,measurement efficiency 1.56 min/100 m2,accuracy better than 0.3 mm.
    Table 4. Comparison of measurement efficiency of various antenna panel deformation measurement methods
    Lianbo FU, Jianjun LIU, Xin REN, Wei YAN, Deqing KONG, Wangli CHEN, Hai HUANG, Xingye GAO. Rapid Inspection Method and Accuracy Analysis of Large Antenna Panel Deformation[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51(6): 0612002
    Download Citation