• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 22, 2220001 (2021)
Jiefei Han, Bobo Lian, and Liying Sun*
Author Affiliations
  • Suzhou Jiaoshi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.2220001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jiefei Han, Bobo Lian, Liying Sun. Adaptive Construction Method for Binary Measurement Matrix Based on Deep Learning[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(22): 2220001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Sampling network model based on deep learning
    Fig. 1. Sampling network model based on deep learning
    Binary sampling network model based on deep learning
    Fig. 2. Binary sampling network model based on deep learning
    Original images used in simulation experiment. (a) Ball; (b) Face
    Fig. 3. Original images used in simulation experiment. (a) Ball; (b) Face
    Simulation results of different measurement matrices. (a)--(f) Results of random Gaussian matrix; (g)--(l) results of Toeplitz matrix; (m)--(r) results of Hadamard matrix; (s)--(x) results of proposed matrix
    Fig. 4. Simulation results of different measurement matrices. (a)--(f) Results of random Gaussian matrix; (g)--(l) results of Toeplitz matrix; (m)--(r) results of Hadamard matrix; (s)--(x) results of proposed matrix
    Ghost imaging system structure based on compressed sensing. (a) Principle diagram; (b) picture
    Fig. 5. Ghost imaging system structure based on compressed sensing. (a) Principle diagram; (b) picture
    Target images of laser imaging experiment. (a) Target1; (b) Target2
    Fig. 6. Target images of laser imaging experiment. (a) Target1; (b) Target2
    Results of laser imaging under different sampling rates. (a)--(f) Results of random Gaussian matrix; (g)--(l) results of Toeplitz matrix; (m)--(r) results of Hadamard matrix; (s)--(x) results of proposed matrix
    Fig. 7. Results of laser imaging under different sampling rates. (a)--(f) Results of random Gaussian matrix; (g)--(l) results of Toeplitz matrix; (m)--(r) results of Hadamard matrix; (s)--(x) results of proposed matrix
    MatrixSR=0.1SR=0.2SR=0.5
    BallFaceBallFaceBallFace
    GS14.0416.0817.4519.9831.7128.95
    TP18.1415.7522.9518.8532.8224.45
    HM29.2523.2531.6827.4837.8233.28
    Proposed31.1127.1634.2029.6139.5033.93
    Table 1. PSNR results of different measurement matrices under different sampling rates
    MatrixSR=0.1SR=0.2SR=0.5
    BallFaceBallFaceBallFace
    GS0.2050.3110.2540.4500.7660.796
    TP0.3520.3150.4780.4460.8670.717
    HM0.8780.6460.9100.7950.9770.941
    Proposed0.9170.6960.9530.8670.9820.950
    Table 2. SSIM results of different measurement matrices under different sampling rates
    MatrixSR=0.1SR=0.2SR=0.5
    Target1Target2Target1Target2Target1Target2
    GS9.288.5311.8410.9210.3611.98
    TP8.918.4610.329.8110.0611.18
    HM13.3312.9713.4912.8813.1812.34
    Proposed14.9712.8914.2615.1415.0314.88
    Table 3. PSNR of laser imaging results under different measurement matrices
    MatrixSR=0.1SR=0.2SR=0.5
    Target1Target2Target1Target2Target1Target2
    GS0.0890.0800.1380.1130.1140.128
    TP0.0830.0650.1030.0870.1160.126
    HM0.1810.1150.1810.1360.1650.114
    Proposed0.3160.2420.2950.2840.3220.237
    Table 4. SSIM of laser imaging results under different measurement matrices
    Jiefei Han, Bobo Lian, Liying Sun. Adaptive Construction Method for Binary Measurement Matrix Based on Deep Learning[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(22): 2220001
    Download Citation