• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 9, 0914007 (2021)
Sheng Wang1、*, Shun Zheng3, Wenjun Liu1, Xudong Zhu2, Ming'an Zhou1, and Hao Jiang3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Quzhou College of Technology, Quzhou , Zhejiang 324000, China
  • 2Institute of Laser Advanced Manufacturing, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou , Zhejiang 310027
  • 3Hongwuhuan Machinery Co., Ltd., Quzhou , Zhejiang 324000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0914007 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Sheng Wang, Shun Zheng, Wenjun Liu, Xudong Zhu, Ming'an Zhou, Hao Jiang. Optimization of Process Parameters for Laser Cladding Fe35A Alloy on 45 Steel Surface[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(9): 0914007 Copy Citation Text show less
    Rockwell hardness of cladding sample surface and its testing error
    Fig. 1. Rockwell hardness of cladding sample surface and its testing error
    Effect of laser power on Rockwell hardness of cladding layer surface under different scanning speeds
    Fig. 2. Effect of laser power on Rockwell hardness of cladding layer surface under different scanning speeds
    Effect of powder feeding rate on Rockwell hardness of cladding layer surface under different scanning speeds
    Fig. 3. Effect of powder feeding rate on Rockwell hardness of cladding layer surface under different scanning speeds
    Effect of scanning speed on Rockwell hardness of cladding layer surface under different power feeding rates
    Fig. 4. Effect of scanning speed on Rockwell hardness of cladding layer surface under different power feeding rates
    Surface macro appearance of laser cladding layer prepared at different process parameters
    Fig. 5. Surface macro appearance of laser cladding layer prepared at different process parameters
    Geometric morphology of laser cladding layer prepared at different process parameters
    Fig. 6. Geometric morphology of laser cladding layer prepared at different process parameters
    Effect of process parameters on geometric width of cladding layer
    Fig. 7. Effect of process parameters on geometric width of cladding layer
    Average geometric width of cladding layer and its testing error
    Fig. 8. Average geometric width of cladding layer and its testing error
    Effect of process parameters on geometric height of cladding layer
    Fig. 9. Effect of process parameters on geometric height of cladding layer
    Average geometric height of cladding layer and its testing error
    Fig. 10. Average geometric height of cladding layer and its testing error
    Microstructures of cladding layer of samples 1# and 8#. (a) Sample 1#; (b) sample 8#
    Fig. 11. Microstructures of cladding layer of samples 1# and 8#. (a) Sample 1#; (b) sample 8#
    Three-dimensional morphology of cross-section of cladding layer prepared at optimal process parameters
    Fig. 12. Three-dimensional morphology of cross-section of cladding layer prepared at optimal process parameters
    Microhardness distribution of laser cladding prepared at optimal process parameters
    Fig. 13. Microhardness distribution of laser cladding prepared at optimal process parameters
    Microhardness of cladding layer prepared at optimal process parameters and its testing error
    Fig. 14. Microhardness of cladding layer prepared at optimal process parameters and its testing error
    ElementCrSiMoCNiMnFe
    Mass fraction /%18.313.505.00.628.00.55Bal.
    Table 1. Chemical composition of Fe35A alloy powder for cladding
    No.Laser power /WScanning speed /(mm·s-1)Powder feeding rate /(g·min-1
    1#2100515
    2#2100622.5
    3#2100730
    4#2400722.5
    5#2400615
    6#2400530
    7#2700715
    8#2700522.5
    9#2700630
    Table 2. Laser cladding parameters
    No.1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9#
    Hardness /HRC42.035.036.336.836.935.436.034.835.8
    Table 3. Average Rockwell hardness of Fe35A cladding layer prepared with different laser parameters
    Sheng Wang, Shun Zheng, Wenjun Liu, Xudong Zhu, Ming'an Zhou, Hao Jiang. Optimization of Process Parameters for Laser Cladding Fe35A Alloy on 45 Steel Surface[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(9): 0914007
    Download Citation