• High Power Laser Science and Engineering
  • Vol. 9, Issue 2, 02000e22 (2021)
Deen Wang1、2、3, Xin Zhang3, Wanjun Dai3, Ying Yang3, Xuewei Deng3, Lin Chen1、2、3, Xudong Xie3, Dongxia Hu3, Feng Jing3, Zeping Yang4, Qiang Yuan3, Xiaofeng Wei3, Qihua Zhu3, Wanguo Zheng3, Xiaomin Zhang3, and Lei Huang1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Photonic Control Technology (Tsinghua University), Ministry of Education, Beijing100084, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Department of Precision Instrument, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, China
  • 3Research Center of Laser Fusion, CAEP, Mianyang621900, China
  • 4Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu610209, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1017/hpl.2021.3 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Deen Wang, Xin Zhang, Wanjun Dai, Ying Yang, Xuewei Deng, Lin Chen, Xudong Xie, Dongxia Hu, Feng Jing, Zeping Yang, Qiang Yuan, Xiaofeng Wei, Qihua Zhu, Wanguo Zheng, Xiaomin Zhang, Lei Huang. 1178 J, 527 nm near diffraction limited laser based on a complete closed-loop adaptive optics controlled off-axis multi-pass amplification laser system[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(2): 02000e22 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of the 1178 J near diffraction limited 527 nm laser system using off-axis multi-pass amplification and complete closed-loop AO. BS, beamsplitter; CM, cavity mirror; DM, deformable mirror; L1–L10, focus lenses; M1–M7, IM1 and IM2, reflection mirrors; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer; PA, pinhole array; PEPC, plasma-electrode Pockels cell; SA, square aperture; TM, transport mirror.
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the 1178 J near diffraction limited 527 nm laser system using off-axis multi-pass amplification and complete closed-loop AO. BS, beamsplitter; CM, cavity mirror; DM, deformable mirror; L1–L10, focus lenses; M1–M7, IM1 and IM2, reflection mirrors; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer; PA, pinhole array; PEPC, plasma-electrode Pockels cell; SA, square aperture; TM, transport mirror.
    (a) Photo and (b) schematic diagram of the lab-manufactured DM; (c) hexagonally distributed 45 actuators in the DM; (d) interference fringe and (e) wavefront of the initial surface shape of the DM.
    Fig. 2. (a) Photo and (b) schematic diagram of the lab-manufactured DM; (c) hexagonally distributed 45 actuators in the DM; (d) interference fringe and (e) wavefront of the initial surface shape of the DM.
    Optical schemes for configurations (a) C1 and (b) C2.
    Fig. 3. Optical schemes for configurations (a) C1 and (b) C2.
    (a), (c) Laser beam on the DM in configurations (a) C1 and (c) C2. (b), (d) Influence functions for the same actuator (i.e., the actuator in the blue dashed square in (a) and (c)) for configurations (b) C1 and (d) C2.
    Fig. 4. (a), (c) Laser beam on the DM in configurations (a) C1 and (c) C2. (b), (d) Influence functions for the same actuator (i.e., the actuator in the blue dashed square in (a) and (c)) for configurations (b) C1 and (d) C2.
    Comparison between the representative eigenmodes of configurations C1 and C2. The first and third rows are for configuration C1 and the second and fourth rows are for configuration C2.
    Fig. 5. Comparison between the representative eigenmodes of configurations C1 and C2. The first and third rows are for configuration C1 and the second and fourth rows are for configuration C2.
    Correction results of configurations C1 and C2 for the 3rd to 15th Zernike-mode aberrations: (a) PV and (b) RMS values of the residual errors.
    Fig. 6. Correction results of configurations C1 and C2 for the 3rd to 15th Zernike-mode aberrations: (a) PV and (b) RMS values of the residual errors.
    The 4th, 5th, 11th, and 12th Zernike modes.
    Fig. 7. The 4th, 5th, 11th, and 12th Zernike modes.
    The target wavefront distortions to be corrected: (a) static wavefront distortion and (b) dynamic wavefront distortion.
    Fig. 8. The target wavefront distortions to be corrected: (a) static wavefront distortion and (b) dynamic wavefront distortion.
    The wavefront distortions of the laser beam on the image plane before pinholes (a1) PA2, (b1) PA3, and (c1) PA4 and (d1) at the target; (a2)–(d2) are the corresponding distributions of the focal spots.
    Fig. 9. The wavefront distortions of the laser beam on the image plane before pinholes (a1) PA2, (b1) PA3, and (c1) PA4 and (d1) at the target; (a2)–(d2) are the corresponding distributions of the focal spots.
    (a), (b) Generated surface shapes of the DM to compensate the wavefront distortions for configurations C1 and C2, respectively; (c) residual wavefront error at the target after correction by using configuration C1; (d) distribution of the target focal spot after correction by using configuration C1.
    Fig. 10. (a), (b) Generated surface shapes of the DM to compensate the wavefront distortions for configurations C1 and C2, respectively; (c) residual wavefront error at the target after correction by using configuration C1; (d) distribution of the target focal spot after correction by using configuration C1.
    Residual errors of the wavefront distortions on the image plane before pinholes (a1) PA2, (b1) PA3, and (c1) PA4 and (d1) at the target after correction by using the configuration C2; (a2)–(d2) corresponding distributions of the focal spots.
    Fig. 11. Residual errors of the wavefront distortions on the image plane before pinholes (a1) PA2, (b1) PA3, and (c1) PA4 and (d1) at the target after correction by using the configuration C2; (a2)–(d2) corresponding distributions of the focal spots.
    Experimental results: (a) static wavefront distortion of the entire beamline; (b) dynamic wavefront distortion of the main amplifier; (c) total wavefront distortion of the entire beamline composed of static and dynamic wavefront distortions; (d) residual error of the wavefront distortion at the target after correction; (e) distribution of the focal spot at the target before correction; (f) distribution of the focal spot at the target after correction.
    Fig. 12. Experimental results: (a) static wavefront distortion of the entire beamline; (b) dynamic wavefront distortion of the main amplifier; (c) total wavefront distortion of the entire beamline composed of static and dynamic wavefront distortions; (d) residual error of the wavefront distortion at the target after correction; (e) distribution of the focal spot at the target before correction; (f) distribution of the focal spot at the target after correction.
    Measured wavefront distortion of the 527 nm laser at the target and the corresponding distribution of the focal spot for: (a1), (a2) the first shot; (b1), (b2) the second shot; (c1), (c2) the third shot.
    Fig. 13. Measured wavefront distortion of the 527 nm laser at the target and the corresponding distribution of the focal spot for: (a1), (a2) the first shot; (b1), (b2) the second shot; (c1), (c2) the third shot.
    LensL1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8L9L10
    Aperture (mm) $\phi$ 20 $\phi$ 20 $\phi$ 70 $\phi$ 80260×260260×26080×8080×80260×260 $\phi$ 15
    Thickness (mm)338830301010302
    Focal length (m)0.150.150.691.38662.11.7520.05
    Table 1. Parameters of the lenses.
    MirrorIM1IM2CMM1, M7M2, M3, M4, M5, M6TMBS
    Aperture (mm)60×7015×25260×26045×5580×110260×26050×70
    Thickness (mm)105401020405
    Table 2. Parameters of the reflection mirrors.
    PinholePA1PA2PA3PA4
    Size (DL)30304040
    Size (mm) $\phi$ 1.90 $\phi$ 1.90 $\phi$ 2.11 $\phi$ 2.11
    Table 3. Parameters of the spatial filter pinholes.
    ParametersMirrorPostActuatorBase
    MaterialBK7BK7Piezoelectric ceramicSteel
    Size290 mm× $\phi$ 10 mm×7 mm×320 mm×
    290 mm×10 mm7 mm×320 mm×
    10 mm36 mm80 mm
    Table 4. Key parameters of the lab-manufactured DM.
    ParametersValue
    Damage threshold of the mirror9 J/cm2 @1053 nm, 1 ns
    Reflectivity of the mirror99.95% @1053 nm, 1 ns
    Stroke of the actuator12 μm
    Nonlinearity of the actuator5%
    Hysteresis of the actuator2%
    Initial surface shape of the DM0.43 μm (PV), 0.06 μm (RMS)
    Open-loop bandwidth of the DM50 Hz
    Table 5. Performance of the lab-manufactured DM.
    Laser shot1st2nd3rd
    PV value of the residual error (μm)0.400.430.44
    Diameter of circle enclosing 80% energy (DL)1.301.291.33
    Table 6. Residual errors and beam quality for three consecutive shots.
    Deen Wang, Xin Zhang, Wanjun Dai, Ying Yang, Xuewei Deng, Lin Chen, Xudong Xie, Dongxia Hu, Feng Jing, Zeping Yang, Qiang Yuan, Xiaofeng Wei, Qihua Zhu, Wanguo Zheng, Xiaomin Zhang, Lei Huang. 1178 J, 527 nm near diffraction limited laser based on a complete closed-loop adaptive optics controlled off-axis multi-pass amplification laser system[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(2): 02000e22
    Download Citation