• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 22, 221503 (2020)
Hongying Zhang*, Weimin Yang, and Huisan Wang
Author Affiliations
  • College of Electronic Information and Automation, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.221503 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hongying Zhang, Weimin Yang, Huisan Wang. 3D Face Recognition Combining Local Keypoints with Isogeodesic Curves Zhang Hongying[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(22): 221503 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of our algorithm
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of our algorithm
    Diagram of direction vector decomposition
    Fig. 2. Diagram of direction vector decomposition
    Point extracted in the nose root. (a) Points extracted along the direction vector ss-o; (b) point searched in the nose
    Fig. 3. Point extracted in the nose root. (a) Points extracted along the direction vector ss-o; (b) point searched in the nose
    Extracted areas of the nose and eyes. (a) Nose area; (b) eyes area; (c) areas combing nose with eyes
    Fig. 4. Extracted areas of the nose and eyes. (a) Nose area; (b) eyes area; (c) areas combing nose with eyes
    Definition process of coverage rate. (a) Feature points location; (b) feature points selection; (c) range partition; (d) coverage area
    Fig. 5. Definition process of coverage rate. (a) Feature points location; (b) feature points selection; (c) range partition; (d) coverage area
    Combination areas with different coverage rates. (a) 25% coverage rate; (b) 50% coverage rate; (c) 75% coverage rate; (d) 90% overage rate
    Fig. 6. Combination areas with different coverage rates. (a) 25% coverage rate; (b) 50% coverage rate; (c) 75% coverage rate; (d) 90% overage rate
    Combination area under different coverage rates after keypoints filtering. (a) 25% coverage rate; (b) 50% coverage rate; (c)75% coverage rate; (d) 90% coverage rate
    Fig. 7. Combination area under different coverage rates after keypoints filtering. (a) 25% coverage rate; (b) 50% coverage rate; (c)75% coverage rate; (d) 90% coverage rate
    Four isogeodesic curves extracted in this paper
    Fig. 8. Four isogeodesic curves extracted in this paper
    Coverage rateAccuracy
    BosphorusFRGCv2.0
    2592.9892.66
    5093.6294.87
    7595.5497.16
    9094.1296.59
    Table 1. Face recognition rates in terms of different coverage rates unit: %
    Fusion coefficient μAccuracy
    BosphorusFRGCv2.0
    0.189.1289.63
    0.290.5691.96
    0.392.6693.23
    0.493.9895.66
    0.595.9397.98
    0.697.0198.63
    0.796.4398.23
    0.896.0397.98
    0.995.9597.25
    Table 2. Face recognition rates in terms of different fusion coefficients unit:%
    AlgorithmNeutralAngerDisgustFearHappySadnessSurpriseAll
    In Ref. [19]100.0095.8091.3095.7096.2097.0095.8096.80
    In Ref. [20]100.0095.8088.4081.4088.7097.0093.0093.40
    In Ref. [7]98.9694.1288.2498.5598.0896.92100.0097.41
    Ours100.0095.7192.1196.8297.5497.6697.1397.01
    Table 3. Comparison of different algorithms on the Bosphorus database unit:%
    AlgorithmNeutralNon-neutral
    DA-NICP100.0097.00
    In Ref. [6]100.0098.52
    In Ref. [7]98.4597.50
    In Ref. [19]100.0096.30
    CPD100.0097.91
    In Ref. [9]98.8898.85
    In Ref. [10]98.7098.70
    Ours100.0098.63
    Table 4. Comparison of different algorithms on the FRGCv2.0 database unit:%
    Hongying Zhang, Weimin Yang, Huisan Wang. 3D Face Recognition Combining Local Keypoints with Isogeodesic Curves Zhang Hongying[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(22): 221503
    Download Citation