• Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
  • Vol. 42, Issue 6, 1928 (2022)
Can CHENG1、1;, Da-qian HEI2、2; *;, Wen-bao JIA1、1;, Qing SHAN1、1;, Yong-sheng LING1、1;, and Dong ZHAO1、1;
Author Affiliations
  • 11. Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, College of Materials Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
  • 22. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)06-1928-06 Cite this Article
    Can CHENG, Da-qian HEI, Wen-bao JIA, Qing SHAN, Yong-sheng LING, Dong ZHAO. Study on Metallic Samples Determination Based on Prompt Gamma Neutron Activation Analysis Technique[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2022, 42(6): 1928 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of the designed PGNAA system(a): Top view; (b): Side view
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the designed PGNAA system
    (a): Top view; (b): Side view
    The background spectrum of system(a): 450~1 000 keV; (b): 1 000~2 000 keV; (c): 2 000~4 500 keV
    Fig. 2. The background spectrum of system
    (a): 450~1 000 keV; (b): 1 000~2 000 keV; (c): 2 000~4 500 keV
    Prompt gamma-ray spectra and peaks fitting of the meatal samples(a): Spectra of Fe; (b): Peaks fitting of Fe; (c): Spectra of Ti; (d): Peaks fitting of Ti; (e): Spectra of Cr; (f): Peaks fitting of Cr; (g): Spectra of Ni; (h): Peaks fitting of Ni; (i): Spectra of Cu; (j): Peaks fitting of Cu
    Fig. 3. Prompt gamma-ray spectra and peaks fitting of the meatal samples
    (a): Spectra of Fe; (b): Peaks fitting of Fe; (c): Spectra of Ti; (d): Peaks fitting of Ti; (e): Spectra of Cr; (f): Peaks fitting of Cr; (g): Spectra of Ni; (h): Peaks fitting of Ni; (i): Spectra of Cu; (j): Peaks fitting of Cu
    The calibration curve of metal samples(a): Fe; (b): Ti; (c): Cr; (d): Ni; (e): Cu
    Fig. 4. The calibration curve of metal samples
    (a): Fe; (b): Ti; (c): Cr; (d): Ni; (e): Cu
    元素编号:尺寸(L1×L2×L3)/cm3质量/g/keV
    Fe#1: 1×4×4
    #2: 2×4×4
    #3: 3×4×4
    #4: 4×4×4
    123.36, 246.50, 369.99, 493.11846.8
    Ti71.07, 142.21, 213.31, 284.44983.5
    Cr113.99, 228.14, 342.76, 456.881 434.2
    Ni143.28, 286.07, 429.44, 572.901 454.3
    Cu141.41, 282.71, 423.94, 565.25962
    Table 1. Parameters and energies of prompt gamma-rays of Fe, Ti, Cr, Ni and Cu
    标准样品直径×高度/cm×cmFe/Wt%Cr/Wt%
    YSBS3738853.8124.33
    YSBS373783.5×3.571.2018.08
    YSBS3738682.5611.76
    Table 2. Parameters of stainless steel standard samples
    样品
    编号
    探测效率
    FeTiCrNiCu
    #18.97×10-39.16×10-36.64×10-36.28×10-38.11×10-3
    #27.40×10-38.33×10-35.79×10-35.28×10-36.63×10-3
    #36.39×10-37.75×10-35.19×10-34.63×10-35.69×10-3
    #45.76×10-37.35×10-34.80×10-34.20×10-35.11×10-3
    Table 3. Detection efficiencies of HPGe detector for different samples
    元素MDL/g
    Fe44
    Ti25
    Cr33
    Ni108
    Cu72
    Table 4. The MDL of different metal samples
    元素PGNAA校准曲线PGNAA检测结果/(Wt%)XRF校准曲线XRF检测结果/(Wt%)偏差/%
    Fey=14.13x71.54±3.73y=423.80x-4 32574.46±4.674.08
    Cry=26.72x15.14±1.08y=485.97x+2 45214.69±1.32-2.97
    Table 5. Determination results of unknown stainless steel sample
    Can CHENG, Da-qian HEI, Wen-bao JIA, Qing SHAN, Yong-sheng LING, Dong ZHAO. Study on Metallic Samples Determination Based on Prompt Gamma Neutron Activation Analysis Technique[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2022, 42(6): 1928
    Download Citation