• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 50, Issue 16, 1602206 (2023)
Xinlong Liao, Boyong Su*, Shuo Xu, Guoran Hua..., Heng Wang and Yupeng Cao|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • School of Mechanical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, Jiangsu, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL221368 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xinlong Liao, Boyong Su, Shuo Xu, Guoran Hua, Heng Wang, Yupeng Cao. Flow Law of Plastic Deformation of TC4 Titanium Alloy by Laser Shock Peening[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(16): 1602206 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of LSP treatment
    Fig. 1. Schematic of LSP treatment
    Three dimensional finite element model after mesh division
    Fig. 2. Three dimensional finite element model after mesh division
    Pressure-time history curves of laser shock wave
    Fig. 3. Pressure-time history curves of laser shock wave
    Deformation diagram extracted on center line
    Fig. 4. Deformation diagram extracted on center line
    Volume calculation flowchart
    Fig. 5. Volume calculation flowchart
    Simulation result of deformation when laser power density is 3.02 GW/cm2. (a) Cloud diagram of deformation; (b) cloud diagram of deformation section; (c) detailed surface deformation distribution
    Fig. 6. Simulation result of deformation when laser power density is 3.02 GW/cm2. (a) Cloud diagram of deformation; (b) cloud diagram of deformation section; (c) detailed surface deformation distribution
    Simulation results of surface residual stress when laser power density is 3.02 GW/cm2. (a) Cloud diagram of residual stress; (b) detailed distribution of residual stress
    Fig. 7. Simulation results of surface residual stress when laser power density is 3.02 GW/cm2. (a) Cloud diagram of residual stress; (b) detailed distribution of residual stress
    Distributions of surface deformation and surface residual stress under different laser power densities. (a) Surface deformation distribution; (b) surface residual stress distribution
    Fig. 8. Distributions of surface deformation and surface residual stress under different laser power densities. (a) Surface deformation distribution; (b) surface residual stress distribution
    Laser shock test results. (a) Micro-indention on specimen surface; (b) topography of surface micro-indention; (c) detailed surface profiles; (d) micro-indention depth, convex deformation height, and residual stress versus laser power density
    Fig. 9. Laser shock test results. (a) Micro-indention on specimen surface; (b) topography of surface micro-indention; (c) detailed surface profiles; (d) micro-indention depth, convex deformation height, and residual stress versus laser power density
    Surface micro-indention depth versus laser power density
    Fig. 10. Surface micro-indention depth versus laser power density
    Detailed deformation distributions at different depths when laser power density is 3.02 GW/cm2
    Fig. 11. Detailed deformation distributions at different depths when laser power density is 3.02 GW/cm2
    Fitting curves. (a) Surface micro-indention deformation; (b) internal convex deformation
    Fig. 12. Fitting curves. (a) Surface micro-indention deformation; (b) internal convex deformation
    Distributions of plastic deformation volume. (a) Trend in volume of each part; (b) proportion of volume of each part
    Fig. 13. Distributions of plastic deformation volume. (a) Trend in volume of each part; (b) proportion of volume of each part
    TEM images of TC4 titanium alloy surface layer before and after LSP. (a) Position at 10 μm below surface before LSP; (b) micro-indention and (c) annular convex deformation areas at 10 μm below surface after LSP; (d) internal convex deformation area at 1 mm below surface after LSP
    Fig. 14. TEM images of TC4 titanium alloy surface layer before and after LSP. (a) Position at 10 μm below surface before LSP; (b) micro-indention and (c) annular convex deformation areas at 10 μm below surface after LSP; (d) internal convex deformation area at 1 mm below surface after LSP
    Particle size distribution diagrams of TC4 titanium alloy before and after LSP. (a) Position at 10 μm below surface before LSP; (b) micro-indention and (c) annular convex deformation areas at 10 μm below surface after LSP; (d) internal convex deformation area at 1 mm below surface after LSP
    Fig. 15. Particle size distribution diagrams of TC4 titanium alloy before and after LSP. (a) Position at 10 μm below surface before LSP; (b) micro-indention and (c) annular convex deformation areas at 10 μm below surface after LSP; (d) internal convex deformation area at 1 mm below surface after LSP
    Laser impact surface morphology when spot overlapping rate is 0
    Fig. 16. Laser impact surface morphology when spot overlapping rate is 0
    Laser impact surface morphology when spot overlapping rate is 33%
    Fig. 17. Laser impact surface morphology when spot overlapping rate is 33%
    Laser impact surface morphology when spot overlapping rate is 50%
    Fig. 18. Laser impact surface morphology when spot overlapping rate is 50%
    ParameterGroup 1Group 2Group 3Group 4Group 5
    Laser power density /(GW/cm21.582.253.024.926.43
    Pulse duration /ns1616161616
    Spot diameter /mm2.52.52.52.52.5
    Number of shocks11111
    Table 1. LSP parameters
    ParameterDensity /(kg·m-3Poisson ratioModulus of elasticity /GPaA /MPaB /MPanC
    Value45000.3421.10950.228603.38250.19920.0198
    Table 2. Basic material parameters of TC4 titanium alloy
    Xinlong Liao, Boyong Su, Shuo Xu, Guoran Hua, Heng Wang, Yupeng Cao. Flow Law of Plastic Deformation of TC4 Titanium Alloy by Laser Shock Peening[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(16): 1602206
    Download Citation